The Red Pill is the best explanation of the forces that drive the sexual marketplace, with competition being the most powerful of those forces. Competition is inherently a masculine force, whereas anti-competition is inherently a feminine force. This is true for one simple reason: when it comes to human reproduction, men have an abundant amount of sperm and women have a small amount of eggs. The abundance of sperm makes a man nearly biologically worthless, while the comparative rareness of eggs makes a woman valuable. Men must demonstrate that their sperm is superior in order to gain access to those rare eggs, and thus we must compete with each other in the sexual marketplace if our genes are to survive. The best way to do this is by continuously raising our SMV.

Competition promotes growth, lower prices, profit, efficient allocation of resources, and raises the quality of life of everybody as equally as possible in the long run. Red Pill knowledge aids men in competing much more efficiently by helping them raise their SMV (growth), which gives them access to more (lower prices) high quality (profit) women. The alphas get pussy and pass on their genes while the betas provide and get dead-bedroomed/cucked (efficient allocation of resources), and it removes a lot of the genetically inferior betas from the gene pool (raises the quality of life for the most amount of people in the long run). Competition is the name of the game.

Contrast this with its feminine counterpart, anti-competition. Higher prices, monopolies, and zero profit motive - which promote stagnated growth, forced wealth redistribution, and a worsening of the average quality of life. Socialism always fails because it destroys the pricing structure that is the backbone of how market forces efficiently communicate information to properly allocate resources, and replaces it with a central planning state apparatus that reallocates resources to the perceived benefit of those controlling the state. That apparatus is the only way that monopolies have ever been created and maintained throughout history. This makes sense because the state itself is a monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force, thus it follows that the only laws it can pass are inherently monopolistic and anti-competitive.

From youth, women receive male attention and validation for doing nothing other than existing. They never have to learn how to compete for access to men the way men have to learn to compete for access to women. Since men effectively have an infinite amount of sperm, there is no biological need for a woman to compete for Chad’s genetics. He is more than capable of sharing his sperm with many women simultaneously, and in fact they prefer sharing Chad’s sperm to having a monopoly on a beta’s sperm. The real problem for a woman is that other women represent a threat to her ability to monopolize a man’s provisionary aspects (validation, attention, committment, and/or resources), and her own SMV is the largest factor that affects that ability.

A woman's SMV relies almost entirely on her looks, which are largely dependent on her genetics and how old she is. Beyond taking care of her appearance, her control over her looks is extremely limited compared to men. So even if she did learn how to compete the way men do, it would be futile because it would not improve her SMV. Since it is impossible for her to outcompete other women who are genetically prettier than her, her only alternative is to destroy her competition.

To do this, women ultimately seek to establish a monopoly on (LTR/marry) their unicorn genetically superior provider (Alpha Bucks). Many of them fail at ever accomplishing this. The older or uglier a woman who hasn't succeded, the more she will have to rely on attempting to destroy her competition. That is why older women slut-shame so much and shame older man/younger woman couples. If she can’t monopolize Chad’s provision, she will instead have to monopolize a beta’s provision, possibly pop out some of his kids, and eventually attempt to reduce the risk of further passing on his genetics by dead-bedrooming him and/or cucking him with Chad’s baby. In a nutshell, AF/BB.

Like any free market, in the sexual marketplace there are competing currencies whose values are determined by the consumers that engage in voluntary trade to create a stable pricing structure. Women trade their currency (sex) for men's currency (provisionary aspects like validation, attention, commitment, and/or resources). The higher a person's SMV, the more purchasing power their currency has. For example, a high SMV man can "purchase" a high SMV woman's sex in exchange for very little to no provision, wheras a low SMV man's currency is not valuable enough to purchase a high SMV woman's sex. Sex costs alphas less than it does betas.

The more currency that is in circulation, the less valuable a person's currency becomes. The more a woman gives out sex to different men, the less she can buy with it after each transaction. Every time a woman's n count goes up, that decreases the chances of her being able to "buy" provision from a higher SMV man. Why would he want to waste his time providing her with those things when he would much prefer to provide them to a higher SMV woman with lower n count? Conversely, the more a man gives out his currency, the less valuable it becomes and the less sex he can "buy" with it. A man who spends his currency too often - a beta orbiter, a guy that commits too easily, or a guy who spends too much literal money on a woman - is the male version of a slut, and that sexually repulses women.

If every woman was a huge slut, women's currency would become practically worthless relative to men's currency. The price of sex would nosedive for all men because any man could get sex with very little effort, and there would be no incentive for them to provide anything to women. In early human history, that would have been devastating for women and their children, so they evolved over millions of years to be more selective about the quality and quantity of their sexual partners. Instead of humans being purely polygamous or purely monogamous, we evolved the drive to pursue both polygamy and serial monogomy as a dualistic mating strategy. The market forces of evolution and natural selection have perfectly balanced the values of the male and female currencies relative to each other, so the pricing structure is stable and efficient. It is only when the state manipulates that pricing structure that the values of the currencies become artificially distorted relative to one another.

In the U.S., the state has a monopoly on the currency. You are required by law to use the Federal Reserve Note as legal tender for payments of all debts, regardless of how badly the state destroys its value through inflation. Competing currencies have no legal enforcement. Can you imagine if such backwards logic were applied to the sexual marketplace, where competing currencies were abolished and sex was somehow established as the monopoly currency? Men would not be able to increase provision as a positive reward and withdraw it as a negative punishment; we would either have to be completely submissive to the feminine imperative, or drop out of the sexual marketplace altogether (MGTOW).

Fortunately, the state only has the power to distort the values of the currencies in the SMP, not abolish them. The major way it does this is by implementing laws that reduce the reliance of women on men’s provision such as welfare, alimony, and child support laws that disproportionately harm men relative to women. The state cannot establish sex as the monopoly currency because women are biologically programmed to desire provision from men. But if it could, it would be a true nightmare. One can only use this analogy to speculate the insane amount of damage that legal tender laws have done to the U.S. economy.

Being feminine in nature, the Blue Pill is inherently anti-competitive. A man who does not compete in the sexual marketplace was either sold the blue pill lie that he does not need to ("She said she will always remain loyal until death us do part!") or has become jaded and turned MGTOW. Marriage is the way that women use government force to maintain a monopoly on their provider. He is far less likely to cheat or leave her if he is married to her because she can divorce-rape him. The incentive for him to continue searching for high quality women has been greatly hampered, so his profit motive has been destroyed. Thus, the blue pill man's SMV stagnates like any sector of the economy does when profit motive is eliminated.

Of course, the loyal blue pill man likes to believe that marriage is a two-way street - that it is also his monopoly on his oneitis, but we know that is not true because AWALT. She will dead-bedroom, cheat, and/or divorce-rape him if the right Chad comes along at the right time, or maybe just because she is bored. From a biological standpoint, the pros of her doing this far outweigh the cons. In fact, her hypergamy ruthlessly demands it. Hubby's monopoly on her vagina is only an illusion; a fiction that exists purely in his mind. Despite this, Blue Pill men have a defense mechanism that will cause them to do whatever they can to preserve this illusion through mate guarding, oneitis, marriage, etc., all of which are attempts to appropriate the female approach of anti-competition. A man acting like a woman is a beta sexual strategy and more than likely will backfire on him sooner or later. Betas get what betas deserve.

Even if a couple wanted to draw up their own custom competing marriage contract, it is illegal to do so. The state has a monopoly on the definition of marriage - a definition that almost guarantees that in the event of a split, the man will get taken to the cleaners in family and divorce courts. Perhaps the couple wants a contract that would ensure a clean split with no possibility of divorce-rape. Perhaps the man wants a contract that says he can divorce-rape his wife if she doesn’t have sex with him whenever he wants. The point is that it should be up to the parties involved in the contract, not the state or some other third party, to decide what the terms of that contract ought to be.

The state excludes anybody who does not want its one-size-fits-all cookie cutter definition of marriage. Anybody who does not agree to its terms is almost certain to be punished with higher taxes. Until recently, this negatively affected LGBTQ people, but continues to affect polygamists, MGTOW, and even heterosexual couples that want to draw up their own competing contracts. Under the current system, not even a prenup is guaranteed to prevent divorce-rape because a white knight judge can decide he doesn't like the husband's face, then declare that hubby didn't accurately list all of his assets at the time the prenup was drawn up, and throw the prenup out the window. The cons of men getting married far outweigh the pros thanks to big daddy government and its monopoly on the marriage contract.

We can see very clearly how the state has massively devalued men’s currency relative to women’s, and how the anti-competitive nature of the Blue Pill has lowered the quality of life for the most amount of people. The negative impacts of blue pill thinking on the quality of life of men are obvious, but what about for women? Despite the advantages that blue pill third-wave feminist society gives women over men, it turns out that growing up without a red pill father, failing to secure commitment from an Alpha Bucks, riding the CC, getting alpha widowed by Chad(s), getting a college degree, having a career as a strong independent womyn, hitting the wall, marrying a beta, pumping out a few kids, divorce raping him, suddenly finding she's unable to attract the same Chads she did in her youth, and turning into a crazy old cat lady wondering "where have all the good men gone?" does not make women happy. More women than ever are on anti-depressants and struggling with mental health issues. The irony of third-wave feminism is that it is more harmful to women than helpful. The feminine imperative, when not kept in check by the masculine imperative, is destructive to societies. Makes sense when you consider that the average woman emphasizes feeeeeelz over logic, which is an inherently self-destructive and almost suicidal pattern of thinking.

The 80/20 rule says that roughly 80% of men are betas and 20% of men are alphas. Since women make up about 51% of the population, that means that alpha males comprise less than 10% of the adult population. When you combine the force of government/democracy with the feminine imperative and Blue-Pill thinking (all of which are anti-competitive by nature), the obvious conclusion is that there can never be any democratic government that is not hostile towards the alpha male. 91% of the voting population is voting against his individual sovereignty. His Liberty must take a backseat and his property must be redistributed for the supposed "greater good", which is obviously nothing more than false collectivist propaganda. Since the 91% are the ones controlling the state, they control how the resources will be redistributed: for what they believe is their own benefit, of course. And what they believe is their own benefit is not always what is actually for the greater good, but, as we’ve seen, is in fact destructive to both individuals and society.

In a free market system, Billy Beta, and only Billy Beta, would be a woman's provider. But 91% of the voting population has decided that society should be taking on the role of being providers by proxy through welfare, subsidized higher education, socialized healthcare in many countries, and various other government programs that benefit women. This is not to mention the "single tax" levied on Chad for being unmarried. Thus, instead of resources being efficently allocated, Chad's resources get forcibly redistributed to women that he isn't fucking and would never otherwise provide for. He could have used that money to keep improving his SMV and pass on his genes more efficiently. Instead, Billy now doesn’t have to provide as much and has more money, Chad has less money, and it has forcibly decreased the gap between Chad's SMV and Billy's SMV. All else equal, the prices of valuable women have gone up for Chad and gone down for Billy. This is just one more way that the state has distorted the pricing structure in the SMP. Chad hasn't just been cucked, he's been gang raped. And gang rape is exactly what democracy is. Two people vote yes, one votes no, and majority rules.

The fact is that we do not need a welfare system because in the absence of a welfare state, private charity is far more efficient at helping the poor than government programs are. According to the late Dr. Milton Friedman, 19th century America, which had zero welfare safety nets, saw the largest outpouring of charitable activity in recorded history and also saw the most rapid improvement in the poor's standard of living out of anywhere before or since. In fact, our “all or nothing” welfare system incentivizes the poor to not try to increase their income too much because once they they hit the hard cutoff point, they will lose their benefits and actually be worse off if they don’t increase their income enough to make up for the difference. Coupled with our failure of a public education system, they keep the poor trapped in an endless cycle of generational poverty. All of the evidence suggests that the poor would be better off if the wealth redistribution apparatus of the state did not exist because it is always used to redistribute wealth from the poor to the rich far more than it is used to redistribute wealth from the rich to the poor. And it is used to redistribute provision from men to women. And redistribute sex from alphas to betas.

The very existence of government requires initiating force against individuals to exploit their labor like they are slaves, i.e. taxes and/or implementing legal tender laws so it can steal your purchasing power through inflation/debt. If you do not pay your taxes, the government will ultimately resort to sending armed thugs to kidnap you at gunpoint and throw you in a locked cage for tax evasion. At the individual level, initiating physical force against another adult is tantamount to breaking frame. A man with strong frame does not initiate physical force against other adults; he only responds with physical force in matters of self-defense, and only when absolutely necessary. This logic does not change simply by transferring it from the individual level to the societal level: utilizing government to physically force your will on society is equivalent to breaking frame.

By electing statist politicians, the 91% are simply instructing people (Congress/police/military) to initiate force against others (YOU) on their behalf. Essentially, the democratic majority has weak frame because it has to use force to get its way when people do not voluntarily cooperate with its will, just like a beta who beats his wife for cheating. If the anti-competitive nature of third-wave feminism was such a good idea, it would not need to rely on force to be implemented. People would simply voluntarily accept it based on its own merits. But the fact is that it does need government force to be implemented, otherwise it would vanish because its arguments are false. Government intervention in the market has destroyed the rate of economic growth in the U.S., is destroying the middle class, unfairly transfers wealth, destroyed the costs of healthcare and education, destroyed our money's purchasing power, and has destroyed our Liberty. The Red Pill man simply cannot reach his full potential in a statist society because statism itself is inherently incompatible with a Red Pill way of life.

Fortunately, free market forces always have a way of bleeding through anti-competitive forces, usually through black markets and price corrections (recessions). Monopolies are inherently inefficient and will fail even when bailed out by government, which is why a woman's monopoly over a man through the government institution of marriage is collapsing. Blue pill society has massively damaged the economy, and specifically the dating market by keeping many men's SMV lower than it would be if they had not been sold blue pill lies. It is causing both men and women to be increasingly unhappy and seek answers. Just like how free market economics are considered offensive by most of society, the Red Pill's taboo nature makes it a sort of black market of information about the SMP that was bound to come into being and take root sooner or later. Market forces demanded it as a correction. It offers a man the information he needs to correct himself and thus help correct the prices in the dating market so that higher value women become cheaper to obtain by raising his own value. The Red Pill ultimately prevails because it is the truth and it works.