So most of us here want to build muscle, but many people seem to think that three times per week 5x5 is ok for that, so here is a quick little guide to how to train for hypertrophy.
Note: If you are a beginner, start with 5x5 by using Stronglifts or Starting Strength or something similar. This is intended for intermediate to advanced lifters.
- We want to train between 60% of 1RM to 80 % of 1RM, most of the time.
- This means that most of the time we will train within the 8-12 reprange.
- Also we want to leave some reps in the tank. Why not go to failure? Since it's takes a lot of effort and makes recovery longer, we want to be able to go to the gym often and pump out high volumes, so we don't have time to recover all the time. Therefore we have to stay 4 to 1 reps away from concentric muscular failure.
On to volume, how much volume should we use?
Well first let's set some terminology straight:
MV = Maintenance Volume The volume needed to maintain current size.
MEV = Minimum Effective Volume The volume needed to start to grow.
MAV = Maximum Adaptive Volume The volume that you need to have to get the best muscular gains.
MRV = Maximum Recoverable Volume The highest volume that you can recover from. Going higher than this will only result in extra fatigue leading to overreaching and if used for longer time, overtraining.
Now, all muscle groups have different volume landmarks.
For example chest has on average:
- MV: 8 sets/week (maintenance)
- MEV: 10 sets/week (to start to grow)
- MAV: 12-20 sets/week (optimal growth)
- MRV: 22 sets/week (don't train more than this)
So how should we train? Select a few muscle groups that you want to focus on. The rest can be putted on maintenance. Then start with the recommended MEV for that muscle group. I recommend that you train with the MEV for some weeks. Then increase the volume=sets/week for that muscle group. Keep increasing the volume for that muscle group over the weeks, do this for some weeks. If you reach a volume that you cannot recover from (MRV), deload.
How do you know if you've reached MRV? If you for some time cannot add weight to the bar, or if you have to go down in either volume or weight. You have reached the MRV for this muscle group. If you feel more than normal fatigued inside or outside of the gym. Then you have reached your MRV for the whole body.
When you have reached your MRV, or think that you are getting close to it. Stop! Take a deload. Deload means going back in volume, go to MEV or below and train far from failure, with low volume. After one or two deload weeks, start over the process and go from MAV (slightly above your MEV) to MRV again.
How often should you train each muscle group? It depens, it's different for each muscle group, check out the landmarks. For example chest should be trained with a frequency of 1.5 to 3 times per week, but triceps can handle 2 to 4 times per week.
Mandatory Reading:
Go out and ramp that volume up!
Someone asked about my physique, although I don't know why anyone would be interested, but here it is: Photos show progress during 4 months, I was on vacation for (december) one month and didn't workout. [Before, After] (https://imgur.com/XkrK0ls). (Only been working out since January 2017, so 1 year and 4 months. Stats: Deadlift: 175kgx1 -386 lbs Squat: 100kgx5 - 220 lbs (can't squat properly due to tense shoulders and get dizzy) Bench: 105x1 - 231 lbs OHP: 70kgx1 - 154 lbs. I'm, 80 kg or 176 lbs and 175 cm or 5'74". )
For more information:
Check out Mike Israetel, he's on youtube and on several podcasts, for example:
abc133769 7y ago
Have you checked out Jeff nippards YouTube channel? he has a series on how to train each muscle group for hypertrophy and has a really scientific approach to it.
mala_madre 7y ago
Yes Jeff Nippard provides great content!
Eat-the-Poor 7y ago
I've been lifting on and off for about 16 years now. I've done 5x5, Crossfit, body part splits and probably some things I'm forgetting. In my experience the most effective has always been the body part split with supersets. That is, lift four days per week only doing exercises for legs, back, chest/shoulders and arms each day. I'll usually start with one or two big compound lift like squat, deadlift, or bench press at heavy weight, lower reps and then move to medium weight compound exercises supersetted with an isolation exercise (e.g. shoulder press for 8 reps and immediately do dumbbell shoulder raises to failure). It's a pretty broish way to workout and probably not going to maximize strength, but I got up to benching 315 lbs doing it and it's definitely effective if your main goal is to get bigger.
mala_madre 7y ago
No it's not the most effective way. Frequency matters and studied have shown that repeatedly, even with matched volume.
Rollo_Mayhem3 7y ago
a buddy of mind states that all the muscle need are 1 exercise for 1 set (although he'll do 3 sets for his workouts) with sufficient time under load so that means, slow reps. His workout would be 3 sets of bench for 8 reps using a slow tempo for about a total of 24 seconds under-load or something to that effect. what would be your response to that?
asfasfsadzzzz 7y ago
So I got a question OP -
I got to the gym about 3-4 times a week. My week looks like this, where X is a day in the gym, O is out - X X O X X O O
I do the same shit every time I'm at gym, usually two sets (10-12 reps in each set) per exercise and two exercises with 4 sets of 10 reps.
Is it good or bad?
mala_madre 7y ago
I did this recently. Upper/lower program, with Week 1: X X O X X O X, Week 2: X O X X O X X and so on.
I did 5 sets, and kept reps at 10 for 4 weeks before switching to 8 for 4 weeks.
I did one exercise per muscle group more or less.
Typically I did:
Upper 1: OHP, Chins, BB Row, Incline Bench, skullcrushers, curls Lower 1: Squats, Deadlifts, Leg extensions, Leg curls.
Upper 2: Bench, Chins, Seal Row, Incline Bench, skullcrushers, curls Lower 2: Deadlifts, squats (my friends did front squats but I havent practised that), Leg exentsions, Leg curls.
For me that was really great volume and frequency. Now I will try RP out and up the volume even more.
It's hard to answer your question since I don't know which exercises you do.
zeekt12 7y ago
2 words: Concurrent periodization. Watch alphadestiny on YouTube, legit sht
JaxHerer 7y ago
People around here don't like him because they want low bodyfat chest abs, and if you don't do the powerlifting moves apparently you are considered a pussy.
mala_madre 7y ago
I think its fine to don't do compound movements. But they are time effective and you build a lot muscle in short time, so if you have little time to exercise that's your best bet, and most people do have little time to exercise.
JaxHerer 7y ago
Ohp is comp but not big3 powerlift. Same for row rackpull pullup etc bunch of nobrainers here tbh
mala_madre 7y ago
Agree, I think that OHP, rows, pullups, incline bench etc are great and encourage everyone to use them in their routine.
[deleted]
mala_madre 7y ago
Well, if you want good result you have to do the work, not only in the gym but also using your mind and setting up a good plan. Of course you can get mediocre results by just going to the gym mindlessly.
It's like saying that to loose weight you only need to eat less. Well sure you might get results from that. But not the same results as if you track your calories, lower them over time and make sure you get progress.
[deleted]
mala_madre 7y ago
If you don't plan nothing and just go to the gym and overload by feel you will not overload as much as if you plan for it and try to beat your previous lifts.
Of course I write down all my lifts, it's awesome. How do you overload if you don't know what you were doing previously, makes no sense.
[deleted]
mala_madre 7y ago
Starting to doubt that.
Most people don't go into the gym and just bench, but if you only do that I can understand that you remember all your lifts. Most people do variations on reps and exercises, so you would have to remember a lot.
[deleted]
mala_madre 7y ago
Well I can only talk for myself and there is no way that I would remember all my lifts during one week. Also if I do 10's for some weeks and then want to do 5's I have to go back several weeks to see what's appropriate to start with there.
Updated the post with my stats and pics.
[deleted] 7y ago
[deleted]
mala_madre 7y ago
Good for you, why you even track calories, you don't remember what you eat and get a feel for that?
Yeah, as you didn't read, I've been lifting for 1 year and 4 months. Also I saw a really big change from going from low volume programs (Madcow, Brian Alsruhe Linear Progression) towards a program with higher volume and frequency (Upper Lower split 5 times per week, 5 sets x 10 reps per exercise).
[deleted] 7y ago
What do you think about high rep program like the 20 rep squat?
Considering that by 20 reps you'd most likely be so spent to do any other set, so recovery may be hard with bigger weights...
Do you think it's good for muscle growth?
Also what is your opinion on drinking milk for growth hormones?
I'm just curious-
mala_madre 7y ago
I dont know about that program, you mind to link it?
Yeah heard that about milk, I dont know what to make of it really, I keep eating milk and other daries.
[deleted] 7y ago
Here's an article on it: https://www.jackedfactory.com/20-rep-squat-program/
but I first knew it from a book called Super Squats
JaxHerer 7y ago
Nothing new here, but that makes sense. Try posting something with a different perspective and your post will get locked.
[deleted]
oscarkool 7y ago
It’s not that simple. If you’re a natural weight lifter, getting “big and shredded” simply isnt possible. I dont care what anyone else says, its just the truth. As a natural lifter, your goal should be either 1) get bigger or 2) get leaner. You cannot achieve both as a true natural.
You’ll either be bulky and thick, or skinny and lean. Neither is ideal as a natty but its what you got to work with.
If you want the typical instagram fitness model physique, you’ll have to turn to PEDs which they all are on. They claim to be natty but its all lies. This is the real red pill when it comes to fitness advice.
Maxx Chewning is probably the only legit popular natty on social media. He’s stronger than 99% but his physique is typical of a natural experienced lifter. Such is the life of being natty.
mala_madre 7y ago
What do you mean?
You bulk up and get bigger, then you cut and get leaner. Repeat. Do you think that all the muscle that you've build goes away when cutting or what?
Maxx Chewning has a great physique, I don't think that more than that is what most people want anyway, at least not me.
Stron2g 7y ago
Isnt it expected that at least some of your muscle gets lost when cutting? I thought that was the general consensus.
mala_madre 7y ago
I don't think so. If you are not doing it really aggressively or going low in body fat.
aigamithite 7y ago
Since this post is intended for intermediates+, for beginners I have to say that your muscle doesn't understand if it's moving 100 or 400 or 1000 lbs for 1 2 3 4 200 reps. It only understands stress. When you are just starting it doesn't matter what you do as long as it provides sufficient stimulus and imo, taking everything to true exhaustion (every single set apart warmups) is far superior for a beginner to a set-in-stone routine of %RMs and # reps.
Take the first step by going to the gym, lift some stuff for as long and as much as you can, start growing and then optimize your routine.
mala_madre 7y ago
Agree. Beginners need to be going to the gym regularly and build up a habit of lifting heavy with compound movements.
[deleted] 7y ago
[deleted]
mala_madre 7y ago
Great comments. Yes, Israetel and others such as Jeff Nippard and Eric Helms share so much knowledge for free so it's no problem creating your own program.
anonswede 7y ago
Why not both strength AND volume?
Reverse pyramids is the shit, especially with AMRAP (As Many Reps As Possible - with proper form). If you hit or exceed the goal rep, add weight next time.
1x8+ Heaviest
1x10+ Decrease weight by 5-10%
1x12+ Decrease weight by 5-10%
Further reading: Leangains - The Reverse Pyramid Training Guide
mala_madre 7y ago
No, that's not strength or volume. Too few sets for volume and too high reps for strength.
anonswede 7y ago
It's pretty self-correcting that way.
Too heavy? Maybe you're only strong enough for 5 reps this time, keep the same weight.
Gotten stronger? You hit your goal and increase weights.
Too light? You do high reps and increase weights even more next time.
mala_madre 7y ago
Wow, so you mean I don't have to stick to a fixed rep that someone told me to do? That's awesome, here I've been doing what I'm told and not thinking that I can alter it at all.
Seriously, everyone does that, and if they don't they are just retarded. It's just common sense. Israetel don't just fixed reps in his templates neither.
mountainbiker178 7y ago
What do you think of Jim Wendler's 531 Boring But Big program? I'm almost done with the 3 month challenge. It seems to have some of the concepts that you're describing (sets 60-80% 1RM), though not as many sets as you recommend.
mala_madre 7y ago
I havent checked it out myself, do you mind linking it?
mountainbiker178 7y ago
Here is a link, though he his own website and book. https://www.t-nation.com/workouts/boring-but-big-3-month-challenge
What I like about it is that it tries maintain/increase your strength while implementing hypertrophy. However your program is a lot more focused on the later. I assume strength would decrease on your program, but I wonder if it would be significant?
mala_madre 7y ago
It seems kinda good I think, you have a decent amount of volume. Why not try it and go for RP after? I didnt post any program really, but I think that during the RP programs you will not be as strong as before due to heavy volume and overloading. However if you test your strength after the program and after deload and peak Im sure that you will have made strength gains as well.
I just want to build muscle right now and dont care for strengrmth anyway and why should you? Who will care how much you lift, except for your gym buddies? But it all depends on your goal.
mountainbiker178 7y ago
I appreciate your answers to all the questions here. So have you done a RP program yet? Do you have a RP program picked out? Do you recommend any particular app for RP?
mala_madre 7y ago
Theres no app, you only have the excel templates on their webpage (renaissance periodization).
I havent, but starting a 6 day chest/back split of the male physique template tomorrow. I cant recommend any particular, if you want to buy one choose one that suits how many days you want to workout and if you want to focus on full body or a specific muscle group.
mala_madre 7y ago
Theres no app, you only have the excel templates on their webpage (renaissance periodization).
I havent, but starting a 6 day chest/back split of the male physique template tomorrow. I cant recommend any particular, if you want to buy one choose one that suits how many days you want to workout and if you want to focus on full body or a specific muscle group.
Ben_Eszes 7y ago
Lessons learned: don't read fitness articles on TRP. Do what works for you. The most important thing I learned from Mike Israetel was the reps-in-reserve concept. Don't push a 3x10, but rather a 3x8-12 with 2 RIR.
jur1e 7y ago
80% of 1RM for 8-12 reps, I dont think that's doable to anyone. I can 1rm 180 benc press, but I wouldnt be able to do 144 for 10 reps, and sure as hell not for 3-4 sets.
BrodinsOats 7y ago
FWIW Prilepin's chart advises 3-6 reps at 80% RM for strength training.
This Prilepin chart modified for hypertrophy suggests 5-8 reps @ 80% RM.
[deleted]
doomguide 7y ago
Has worked for me for the last 12 years.
SeamusAwl 7y ago
I do 6 sets of 8 reps at 70% 1RM for the day (or 12 sets for the week). I do a Push day and a Pull day with 2-3 days rest between another Push or Pull day. I only do Squats/Leg Press on push days and Deadlifts on Pull days so I have no official "leg day." So it is doable, but I sometimes have issues getting to 8 reps on my last set. Depends on my daily nutrition.
Trvspkt 7y ago
I’m pretty sure it’s 80% of 8rm
mala_madre 7y ago
Well in this article they talk about 8 reps for 80% of 1RM. But I think on periods RP also uses reps of as low as 6 and as high as 20, so 8-12 is not set in stone, but most of the volume will be there.
jur1e 7y ago
I think good general advice for beginners should be to do 10 reps with the weight they would be able to do 12 reps max, with proper form. Also, dont be afraid in trying to get bigger solely on strength routine, hypertrophy and strength are not mutually exclusive, if you are doing proper working routine you WILL gain both and it's better always better to be stronger than you look imo.
mala_madre 7y ago
That's what Israetel says in the article and that's what I wrote as well. Leave 1-4 reps in the tank, you don't want to go to failure etc...
Btw, on the note on beginners, just listened to a podcast with Dr. Israetel and he talked about that beginners can train more frequently than advanced since they are lifting so light weights that the damage isn't that great. So maybe it would be beneficial to do something with more training frequency than Starting Strength. But haven't found it in written form yet, however he covered it briefly in episode 1 of Revive stronger if someone is interested.
jur1e 7y ago
During 5 years I've been lifting I've seen too many WEAK beginners jumping on pure hypertrophy routine and I'll have to disagree with statement
If they dont have any strength base they shouldnt be doing reps with very low weight, if they can't even do proper pull up they shouldnt be pumping 8-12 lat pulldowns with low weight. They can train more often cause they are not doing any micro tears and thus not growing, both beginners and advanced lifters should always ''feel'' good training that needs proper rest period. I met my gf in gym and back then she was doing million hypertrophy exercises but actually doing jack shit to progress, and of course she was able to go to gym 6 times a week. Under my drill she went from 0 dips to 5x5 dips, 5x5 pulls ups, and 75 bench press and all it took was removing those million different exercises and giving her 5-6 basic ones and making her reallyyy push her body for those 3-5 reps.
mala_madre 7y ago
I agree that you should build up a basic strength. But what Mike talked about in the podcast was frequency for beginners and not volume. So perhaps they could do 4 or even 5 workouts with 5x5, instead of the common 3 times per week. However haven't heard that much about it, was just discussed briefly in the podcast mentioned above.
jur1e 7y ago
Yes, I fully agree with you on that one, when I said strength, I didn't mean starting strength routine, any routine should be used just as a concept and then you modify it to your liking and even add some hyperthrophy if you want. In the end, any routine will yield good gains if done properly that is if you really push yourself more and more each session and staying out of your comfort zone as your body adapts to the load. Sorry if I came across as contradicting in previous posts, I am trying to expand on discussion you posted and add my personal experience.
mala_madre 7y ago
You made some great points and also great that you post your experience of beginner training as I think many people may have the problem that you describes. Maybe someone should do a post about it here, perhaps taking some key points from fuckarounditis
womans_algorithm 7y ago
What do you think about Israetel's video on hypertrophy guide? ( youtube / watch?v=vo1pWGX-Td4)
mala_madre 7y ago
They are great, I look at all his stuff on youtube. Also check him out in podcasts, he visits several but he is regulary on Revive Stronger. Mike wrote all the stuff I wrote about, just summed it up real quick.
[deleted] 7y ago
The most efficient way for naturals to gain muscle is to gain strength
[deleted] 7y ago
I'm not sure this is true.
Gaining muscle has to do with time under tension and can be achieved through high repetition as well.
In my 10+ years experience a regime as described by OP is the best, but every body is different.
mala_madre 7y ago
Would be very interesting to read more about it, what made you get that conclusion?
[deleted] 7y ago
Basic exercise science and physiology
OutrageousCelery 7y ago
Parroting what Alphadestiny says does not count as "science."
[deleted] 7y ago
I dont watch alphadestiny. My uncle has a PhD in physiology and exersice science and is the one who teaches the coaches of proffessional athletes, he has told me the general consensus is what I am saying
mala_madre 7y ago
No. I mean sure you need to progress in strength and overload, but pure strength is not in any way optimal for building muscles.
[deleted] 7y ago
You cannot build muscles without building strength, and vice versa. As I stated, this is basic physiology
mala_madre 7y ago
No shit. No one is saying that you don't need strength. But focus shouldn't be on maxing your 1RM and training with <5RM for any substantial amount of time, if your goal is to build muscle. You will get stronger by doing 8-12 reps as well.
Belluz 7y ago
Best, and i mean best forum for training that i found was ironaddict forum, it is not very active now but it is gold mine of training information
[deleted] 7y ago
Strength isn't just 1rm. A guy that can do 10 reps of 180 on the bench will have a smaller chest than a guy that can bench 250 for 5. Why? Because the guy that can do 250 for 5 can also do 225 for 10. It all ties back to strength. Atleast for beginner-intermediate natural lifters
mala_madre 7y ago
If you say that you train for strength. Everyone assumes that you are training for maxing out your 1RM. Yeah strength is a big factor. And I also think it's good to train it sometimes, maybe take some mesocycles and focus on it. But I still belive that main focus should be volume and strength comes second.
[deleted] 7y ago
[deleted]
mala_madre 7y ago
So who train for strength then? Only amateurs?
I would say powerlifters train for strength, and that strength training is mostly around 3RM.
You don't have to limit yourself to 3-4 days if you don't want to. 5-6 days are absolutely fine if you prefer. Bodybuilder splits are stupid yes, due to lack of frequency. Hypertrophy training with much volume and frequency is how you should train for growth. As you state 8-12 reps are suitable and hitting each muscle group 2-6 times per week depending on goals and size of muscle group. Since you want many sets and high frequency, it might be good to train 5-6 times per week, if you only train 3-4 you almost have to do fullbody programs to get suitable frequency.
[deleted] 7y ago
It has been documented in countless metanalysi that strength is the biggest factor for hypertrophy in natural athletes
mala_madre 7y ago
Check this out by Eric Helms.
Problem with training for strengths, low reps, is that you create a lot of fatigue. Limiting how much volume you can train and recover from, therefore limiting your gains.
ValuePrestige 7y ago
Maybe a stupid question, but why is it recommended for beginners to start with a strength building program rather than a hypertrophy program?
And what's the deal with renaissanceperiodization? They want 99 bucks for one workout? Not even a full routine? That's expensive af
mala_madre 7y ago
It's a full program of 13 weeks. Great stuff, but create your own if you don't want to pay for it, there's a lot of information on their webpage and Israetel is on youtube and podcasts giving away much information for free.
I think it's good to build a strength base. But I don't know how is optimal for training as a beginner. Most will probably work, but the good with starting strength and similar approaches is that you lift heavy with compound exercises and learn to push yourself. You could probably deal with a higher frequency, but I haven't investigated enough on it to recommend something else.
ValuePrestige 7y ago
But it says to select a body part? Or does the routine just focus on that ?
mala_madre 7y ago
It's a full program. You can choose full body. The body part templates has extra focus on that body parts but you still train the whole body, some muscle groups might be put on maintenance and you shouldn't expect too much growth there.
ValuePrestige 7y ago
So as a beginner the full body makes most sense right? Wondering if its really worth the money, why not pick a free Routine from reddit?
mala_madre 7y ago
I would go with Starting Strength or Stronglifts as a beginner and move to RP when you cannot perform well on those. If you want add in a fourth day on those programs to get a bit more volume. But RP seems to be more directed for intermediate lifters.
Sleepy_Zucchini 7y ago
This is a pretty stupid question, but I currently don't have access to a gym. The only workout equipment I have access to is a pullup bar.. Is a gym membership necessary? Or can I train somehow at home? Thanks
mala_madre 7y ago
Well, I think you want to get a gym membership. But you can do a lot with bodyweight exercise for a short period of time. Do pullups, leg raises, toes to bar, dips, handstand pushup, inclined push ups, push ups with someone on your back, squats with someone on your back.
The problem is that many exercises are hard to overload and it's also hard to find a exercise that you cannot do too many or too few reps with.
But it's possible to do some. If you go high in reps, above 20, you want to aim for concentric failure to stimulate growth. If you for example can do 100 situps and you do 50, that will not do much for your growth. If you can do 50 pushups and do 25, that will neither. Then instead do harder exercises as mentioned above.
Also maybe you could buy a kettlebell and do some swings, presses, goblet squats etc.
[deleted] 7y ago
Great post, only thing missing here is discussing time under tension for your movements, a huge part of building size.
mala_madre 7y ago
I would be interested in read more about this, where do you recommend me to start?
mala_madre 7y ago
I would be interested in read more about this, where do you recommend me to start?
[deleted] 7y ago
Take a look at "time under tension hypertrophy"
mala_madre 7y ago
Im going to listen to Eric Helms and trust him in that it's not what has been shown as most important now.
[deleted] 7y ago
Yeah hes agreeing with me in that video, you dont focus on it but if youre not in control on the way down then youre not going to gain mass. 2-3 seconds on the way down is all thats needed for 10 rep sets. All im saying is dont be ripping and dropping the weight to hit that 10 rep count, strict form is a lot more important for making gains
mala_madre 7y ago
Yeah, for me that's just common sense. Thought you meant something fancier, like super slow reps.
[deleted] 7y ago
Fair but for a lot of people is not, I'm blown away by the amount of people who bounce on movements like squats and legs press, bench, ohp and even bicep curls just to get more weight up
The_Lightskin_Wonder 7y ago
I've been hitting the gym since is was 14 for 5 years I boxed and after the air Force I got into weightlifting and eventually just began working out socially and for fun. People always say I look pretty good and I think it's because I've bagun working out by how I feel. And your regimen hits close to my workout habits.
I use to do 5x5 but eventually lowered my weight and stopped counting reps. My weights vary but I get results. Heavy lifting is fun but it gets strenuous and wears your joints out. 40-80% 8-12 is the sweet spot
[deleted]
[deleted]
Arabian_Wolf 7y ago
How to maximize hypertrophy in pure compound lifting routine (like SS and SL)?
I’m using Greyskull Phark’s, while simple enough for me to follow for a long time, doesn’t seem to reward much hypertrophy.
mala_madre 7y ago
Haven't seen that program. But you add in more sets and keep the reps at 8 - 12. There's no reason for not squatting or deadlifting for 8 - 12 reps or higher.
Did it myself, not in the RP program, but did 10 reps for four weeks and then 8 reps for 4 weeks and I grew a lot.
I only did bench, squats, deadlifts, pullups, seal row and military press. Upper lower split, one day rest between workout days, so 5 workouts per week and 5 set per exercise. Worked wonders.
Arabian_Wolf 7y ago
It’s 3x5+ program using basic compound lifts and pull up 3 times a week, where the “+” means AMRAP (as many reps as possible).
I’m not taking enough protein though, perhaps that’s the main culprit.
mala_madre 7y ago
I don't have a good answer for how beginners should train, probably most routines will give result anyway. I did Starting Strength myself and liked it a lot. However you might want to check out this video with Israetel giving tips for beginners.
Don_Himself 7y ago
Sorry to burst the bubble here, but the only program you should be doing after an intermediate program (which btw Madcow 5x5 is absolutely the best) is either smolov if you want to be depressed but want INSANELY quick strength and muscle gains, or SL 5x5 Advanced if you want to gain strength and muscle but a bit slower and safer long term.
too many of you complicate cornflakes. it's as simple as this: more strength means automatically more denser, more fortified muscle. period.
high rep exercises should only be done in assistance to your main low-rep + high-weight compound lifts. the curls, the reverse crunches, the skull crushers, etc etc. but frankly, you wont have time nor energy to complete those after a wild set of heavy 3's or 5's of squats followed by deadlifts. get your squat to 400lbs and deadlifts to 500lbs and you'll achieve a top 10% physique automatically.
[deleted] 7y ago
OP said in another post he hasn’t even done the workout he just posted about. Don’t even waste time on him. He’s just blowing hot air.
Don_Himself 7y ago
im convinced he has special needs or trolling
TheDefendorr 7y ago
The guy is pretty off about mad cow but I would not recommend doing smolov to people after madcow... in fact I wouldnt recommend it at all because its terrible for any long term lifter, actually detrimental
[deleted]
Ben_Eszes 7y ago
This sounds pretentious as hell. Why do you think people can just progress to a 400lb squat? People stall. You need to gain larger muscles to be able to train them to be stronger. It's a alternating ladder of gain-size, gain-strength.
Don_Himself 7y ago
a 400lbs squat and 500lbs deadlift (all 1RM) are totally attainable by 99.99% of men on the planet. some may have to work more than others, but as long as you're consistent and give every session your 100%, you can reach it. it's all about intensity and the quality time off (recovery).
mala_madre 7y ago
Nope. I actually did Madcow after SS and it was really shitty. Low intensity for several weeks, super easy workouts and then in the end it gets super hard for like 2 weeks until you have to start over...
You don't need to do any 3's or 5's on squats or deadlifts if you dont want to, you can shoot for 10's or 8's works great. It doesn't make any sense to waste all your energy for 3 reps and then rest for 5 minutes, when you instead can do sets of 10 reps and rest 2 min and smash in a lot of volume. That's what make you grow.
I noticed it myself. First did SS, then Madcow, then an upper lower split with 5x10 for 4 weeks followed by 5x8. I grew a lot more from the latter.
Don_Himself 7y ago
Don't know what program you followed but it surely wasn't madcow. You don't reset anything in madcow, you keep adding 5lbs to all lifts every week until you plateau (meaning fail to hit all reps on a lift 3 attempts in a row... sometimes even 4 attempts). And the deload is just subtracting 20lbs from the lift you failed and working your way back up until you blast through the plateau.
If you don't fail, you continue onto madcow until you see no more strength gains. That means usually, stalling on your lifts, 2 to 3 deloads with 0 progress. Once that happens, usually around month 5 or 6 (20 to 24 weeks), THEN you switch to an advanced program such as SL 5x5 Advanced or smolov squat.
More strength is more muscle, therefore the heavier you lift the bigger you get. In order to continuously get stronger, you must keep adding weight to the bar - classic progressive overload. The only way to add weight to your lifts consistently and safely is to keep the rep range between 3 to 5. Increasing your 5 rep max will increase your 8 rep max substantially, yet wasting your energy focusing on your 8 or 12 rep max, as an beginner/intermediate, will hardly increase your 5 rep max.
btw beginner/intermediate means a 1RM squat of <300lbs.
It sounds like you were indeed advanced and were able to take advantage of a smolov-like routine. if you were to do anything less than 300lbs for squats x 8 reps, you wouldnt see any significant gains at all. Thats why SL5x5 and Madcow, 5 rep ranges, are substantially effective in building muscle and strength, and those wild smolov-like programs are strictly for advanced lifters who have squeezed out every last bit of gains from the programs that precede it
TelemachusRising 7y ago
This. So much this. I’m on Madcow and it has my shit poppin like nothing else after about 25 years of more or less consistent lifting, albeit I wasted my twenties on the “magazine workouts” Greg Matthews laments—as should all natties. If ya wanna go over ten reps—save it for the iso work.
When you “unplug” from juicy workouts and start focusing on low rep compounds from Madcow or 531 or just a solid RPT program—yer mind gets blown because your body (at least mine) starts to pop with the definition you were always searching for with the “pump” workouts.
Strength is the prime mover of it all. Wondering if I’d lost any “muscle endurance” from focusing on strength/power the past few years, I decided to rep out on pushups for shits and giggles after my regular workout today and got 50 no problem. (Mid bulk 205/6’1”.)
Shit’s not a two-way street: Improving strength will increase the number of reps you can do on a lower weight but increasing how many reps you can do won’t bring your strength (1 rm, 3 rm, 5rm) up and fuck that study that says it does. No one gets to a 315 lb bench doing push-ups or a 500 lb squat doing lunges.
And if you think going heavy is more dangerous after a thorough warm up and proper progression than light, repping till the fuckin cows come home on oly/ compound lifts, then you need to consider why no one likes CrossFit more than orthopedic surgeons.
mala_madre 7y ago
I did Madcow. I worked up to my plateau, doing too little work until the plateau and after that failed super fast and you have to start over with the template. My template didn't describe any deload. anyway I got good strength gains from it, but would recommend more volume to an intermediate lifter, it's fine to do as first program after SS.
That's one part of it. But you also have the big part of neurological adaptations and getting good at what you practice.
So if you want to perform in strength sports you need to train that movements and with heavy weights using low reps. But that won't build you that much muscle, not optimally much at least. Why? Cause you don't get in enough volume.
Yeah try that, you'll be too fatigued to keep it up for any longer period of time and how will you progress? 15 sets? 20 sets?
No. Stay in the 8-12 rep range and max up the volume and you'll see better gains.
Eric helms low vs high reps explains it all for you in this video.
Don_Himself 7y ago
Again, Madcow has no type of reset/start overs. And again, i can tell you did not do madcow 5x5 because you just said you read nothing in your program about deloads, a VERY crucial technique required to blow past plateaus, which every program in existence takes advantage of.
The only way to advance in weights in by clearing the previous weight with perfect from. To achieve perfect form, you squat 3x per week, with dozens of warmup reps before your heavy work sets. By the time you have to switch to madcow, you would have done close to 1000 reps of squats already, your form should be perfect if you've put the effort in it. Youre not making much sense.
You progress by adding weight to the bar.... are you some kind of low effort troll?
mala_madre 7y ago
Maybe not the same variation of it as you then.
Sure you might have good form before starting madcow, so what. What I meant is that strength at 1RM depends a lot of neurological adaptations, thats more than form, its about activating the muscles needed and thats a big part of what you'll practice if you train below 3RM.
Obviously you need to overload, where do I say that you don't? I said that if your goal is strength and powerlifting you want to train a lot with <3 RM creating a lot of fatigue and not allowing for volume.
Don_Himself 7y ago
there is only 1 variation of madcow that works, madcow5x5. besides, all of the variations out there use deloading regardless.
as i said, the reason it's useless to focus on 8 to 12 rep training is because progressive overloading at 3 to 5 rep ranges automatically increases your 8 to 12 rep lifts. get your bench to 315lbs for 1rm or 3 to 5 rep max, and see how easy it is to hit 8 to 12 reps at 225lbs without ever train 8 to 12 reps. yet get stuck training 8 to 12 reps at 225lbs for whatever time, and you'll never get to 315lbs 1rm/3-5rm. all you did was train your endurance at the same weight, which strength training does already anyway as well. you will never get to hit 315lbs because your body had no reason to grow stronger, the weight it faced was always the same.
high rep + high weight is ideal for sculpting the perfect body. but you must first get to high weights, and this is only possible by sticking to a low rep scheme at first. then you graduate to advanced lifts, you can start incorporating high rep assistance exercises to further help your main lifts which you can progressively overload on as well until youre doing high rep + high weight. this is to help your main compound lifts, not the other way around.
mala_madre 7y ago
So you mean that if I increase my weight in say bench press from 80x10 to 90x10 that wont have any carry over ro my 1RM? Doesnt make any sense. You wont build size by doing 5's and 3's at least not as fast as by doing 10's.
Don_Himself 7y ago
i said increasing your 8 to 12 rep weight will have very little to no actual increase in your 1rm or 3 - 5 rep maxes. increasing your 8 rep max, say at 225lbs, to 12 reps max at 225lbs still only increased your endurance. not strength. it wont help you get to 315lbs - only progressive overloading at rep ranges 3 to 5 can help you reach 315lbs and beyond. the only way to get stronger, i.e. bigger and more fit, is to lift heavier and heavier.
and btw, your 10's wont be as heavy as your 3's and 5's. not even close. so why build around your 10, it's beyond pointless. progressive overloading your 3's and 5's will get you bigger because it gets your stronger. i honestly have no clue why this is so hard to grasp right now
mala_madre 7y ago
Perhaps you're right on the carry over part. I myself dont understand why its so hard for people to grasp that volume is the key driver for hypertrophy and not strength.
[deleted] 7y ago
[deleted]
[deleted]
Scandinavianredpill 7y ago
The pitfall of training like this is that you do have to have high enough intensity. You can pump all you want and "feel" a good pump, but you need to have enough intensity to stimulate if you want train this way. Funny thing about Mike Israetel however is that he isn't that strong himself.
Martin Berkhan is not on steroids like Mike and alot stronger.
YOu think todays strongmen are strong? They are not, Look into Marty Gallagher, Kirk Karwoski and Ed Coan. These guys got record lifts that have is not close to being beaten by the "oh" so strong mountain, Eddie hall et.c. Also they had abs while doing them and weighted the same as Mr. Olympias of the 90ties. It's flawed to think there is much difference between body building and strenght. You need to get stronger to get bigger unless you are on tons of steroids. To get stronger you can do high frequency training, but even high frequency training needs to stimulate enough (have high enough intensity).
High intensity / low frequency is far more foolproof than high frequency training because it's easy to fall into not goign for progressive overload and not getting any real stimulation. High intensity you know you get the stimulation you need, it just has the drawback of added recovery time.
Martin Berkhan is 188cm weighted 105 kg with abs. deadlifts 275 kg for 9 reps. seal rows 140 x 8. he has done this training alot like the old strong men and he has a body that smokes most naturals.
No matter how you do it, progressive overload and compounds will get you the closest to your natural limit (add few extras for arms if you want, not needed for shoulder). Look at all the oldschool guys that were FFMI 24-26. They looked amazing and trained this way, they are far far bigger than the youtube fake natties that you are taking advice from. Also alot of these studies done have the flaw of not having a long enough time frame. You can get good results from high frequency for a time peroid of 12-16 weeks, but that doesn't prove that it is the best for everyone over a long period of time. Mike never shows client statements or pictures. why is that? no results. it's pratically too hard to train this way balancing your recovery and getting enough intensity over the long run. Meanwhile Martin Berkhan and Mike Matthews got tons of client pictures with great results.
No matter the program it needs progressive overload and primarily compounds.
mala_madre 7y ago
So what if Berkhan is stronger than Israetel? Who cares? Israetel isn't in it for strength even. Berkhan don't dare to bulk up and grow. He is strong sure, but he is not aesthetic at all.
If you can't overload on high frequency and volume you are just stupid.
Scandinavianredpill 7y ago
not Aesthetic? The only thing Berkhan doesn't have enough of is arms but that's a personal preference of his. Yet he does have huge arms just not big monkey arms that are oversized to him. Also realize a guy as big as Berkhan on shoulders and chest / back has another visual appearance than a smaller guy with the same arm meassurement.
Israetel looks like shit, is on roids and isn't strong either, you want to compare those with Martin that isn't on roids?take a look at their clientlists and who gets the best results. I too took the sciency route and it lead me to shit results, now I train like the old school guys did pre roids and much like Berkhan and Mike Matthew trains.
Try to look up Mike Matthews, also same height but works arms more than Martin, is weaker and has less weight than Martin but looks amazing also.
mala_madre 7y ago
Mike Matthews built an aesthetic physique. I'm not comparing Israetel and Berkhan, you are, and I don't get why.
Anyway Berkhan don't train for strength. He still sticks to the 8-12 rep range. But he do way too few sets/week to make enough growth.
Scandinavianredpill 7y ago
My purpose of using these examples are:
What you think is the "right" way to train, has not produced physiques on the level that those guys have, or strenght on that level.
It's derived from studies that are 1.
Meta analysis where there are so many errors and difference in methods that they are useless or 2:
realize that instructions and even supervision isn't going to produce the same results as learning a training philosophy and how to apply it.
3: the limiting timeframe on all those studies.
4: the varying results it creates, this is how to get on average the best results from alot of different people. It is not so surprising that telling people to traing more often gives better results is it? because the average person in those studies have not understood the importance of intensity (which btw. is different from how you "feel").
mala_madre 7y ago
If you want anecdotal evidence for the method, I don't consider it useful, take a look at Jared Feather and Steve Hall also you have some examples of before after from RP_transformations on instagram here:
[deleted]
Scandinavianredpill 7y ago
there is 1 good transformation and thats from many many years ago. so a person training many years lost a ton of weight and gained some muscle over many years. bravo. all the other "transformations" are nothing but weight loss and minor ones many of them.
try to compare that to Martins transformations over small periods of times where people both get leaner AND Bigger and stronger.
Koppin_a_Feel 7y ago
Everyone says to train muscle groups more than once per week yet I've never seen a 5/6 day split that actually incorporates it.
Does anyone have examples?
Zyvoxx 7y ago
A PPL split is probably the most common
kaane 7y ago
This guy puts some real science into weightlifting. As he states, it should take some time to experiment on this idea and find your "landmarks", but once you do, you will have a very solid framework on how much you should push.
Great information here. Thanks for sharing.
mala_madre 7y ago
Yeah, it's really awesome stuff. And he is great listening to, so I really recommend the podcasts! Also thank you for reading the links, just outlined the most basics here, but there's a lot more in the articles.
ex_addict_bro 7y ago
Great article, great links, etc.
How about getting a comment from someone who actually tried this stuff for 6-12 months or so
[deleted]
mala_madre 7y ago
Yeah, I've just found this out myself and are starting a Male Physique template on Monday. So I can update in like 13 weeks. But I have a lot of faith in this, seems sound.
Guess you could read a bit from some user here: Reddit threads, google: "Program Review: Renaissance Periodization Powerlifting Hypertrophy, PL Strength, and Physique training templates" and "Training Tuesdays: Renaissance Periodization "
kaane 7y ago
Let me share my experience with this approach. I workout mainly bodyweight fitness style, but most most principles are shared between BWF and weight lifting.
My max pullup numbers are 5x5. This is equivalent to 1RM in the bodyweight world. If I hit 5x5 in the same week 2 or 3 times, I can clearly feel that it's too much for me. This is what he is referring to MRV. If I keep my sets as 4x5, which is 80% of my 1RM, I can do it 3 times a week without problems, and when I do this consistently for a few weeks, I can clearly feel an increase in my performance and pullups become easier.
Hope that makes sense
ex_addict_bro 7y ago
Imagine I’m doing some exercise where I’m unable to hit 5x5. Imagine I also need a lot of sleep after. What I understand is I should deload- or if this is an exercise using body weight I should do less reps or same number of reps but less sets. Did I understand this right?
Hudma_Specks 7y ago
I think it would be important to note, for the guys starting their bodybuilding journey, that the guy from the photo is roided out of his socks. That physique is not attainable without juicing.
moltenw 7y ago
Also, that type of physique looks ugly as hell. Really wondering why people go to such lenghts unless it's for themselves, cause aesthetic wise it looks like shit.
Scandinavianredpill 7y ago
roided, is not even that strong, has a high bodyfat percentage. It's funny how all the sciency guys got shit bodies. I could go on and on about how alot of their conclusions are drawn on errors, but I am sure there will be some critique in Martin Berkhans new book as well. After all you have to look at what has produced the biggest and strongest natural bodies of all time and those methods hasn't. That's a fact. Also It doesn't seem to work in pratice (no client testimonials and pictures from any of those guys using the oh so praised new science)
mala_madre 7y ago
Don't think so, that's Jared Feather, natural bodybuilder competitor. Also his physique is similar to Martin Berkhan, who also is natural.
[deleted]
vandaalen 7y ago
Hahahaha. My sides are in orbit. How naive do you have to be to believe that that shmock isn't on juice? I don't have anything against roids, after all I am on TRT myself, but don#t try to bullshit yourself and most importantly not me.
Zyvoxx 7y ago
100% this, I'm not against juice at all but I just wish people would be honest it with it not giving people false hopes.
Hudma_Specks 7y ago
I'd give him 3/5 natty status then. My final offer. On a serious note, I still do not believe that kind of shoulder development and vascularity is possible without PEDs. Perhaps he is a genetic freak, but I still firmly believe that more than 99% guys will not achieve his look without gear. I have seen many natural bodybuilders and they look nothing like that on competition day. Also, claiming natty and getting tested periodically does not prevent many individuals from doing steroids anyways.
mala_madre 7y ago
I agree on what you say about people claiming to be natural, but Jared don't have overly developed traps for example, they look normal, same with Berkhan, which also has a good vascularity. Anyway I don't care if he's natural or not, RP produces great content and that's what I wanted to share.
Hudma_Specks 7y ago
True about his traps, although I think it might be simply his aesthetic choice. His massive deltoids are unlike I have seen in any natural though. I also must agree with you about the Reinessance Periodiodization. One of the few places with great original content left.
izharonline 7y ago
I just go to the gym and lift something. Don't even know what the F am I doing. But I watch my diet. (I am doing the "quarter quarter half diet")
Few month later I started to notice that I did look a little bit muscular than before.
mala_madre 7y ago
Sure man that'll work. But will it be optimal? It's like if I ask you to get as fat as possible and you tell me that eating potatoes and meat will work. It sure will, but I would recommend you to change it out for some candy and cake.
Fedor_Gavnyukov 7y ago
thought you took it from renaissance site before reading. was right. read that whole series many many times over. still go back to it here and there. good post.
RonieGarret 7y ago
How long you are using that plan? How does it work for you?
[deleted] 7y ago
Guy is dishing out advice without even having done it himself. Best not to take this too seriously.
[deleted]
mala_madre 7y ago
Unfortunately I haven't tried it yet, I'm starting a male physique template on Monday though. But his program consists of three mesocycles:
There's a thread on reddit with a review of some programs from RP, but I cannot link to it for some reason? Anyway google this "Program Review: Renaissance Periodization Powerlifting Hypertrophy, PL Strength, and Physique training templates"
Hussy68 7y ago
You all want to train for hypertrophy. Do 8x8 and limit rest to 20-30 seconds. It’s that easy.
[deleted]