I read all the posts on Illimitable Men's website (www.illimitablemen.com) about 9 months ago, and copied these down because I enjoyed his prose and they contained a lot of condensed TRP knowledge. I'm sharing what I copied down here, if you like them go visit Illimitable Men's page and go through his posts.

• Dark Triad: Machiavellianism, Narcissism, Psychopathy.
• More money means more opportunity, more opportunity means more growth. Money is the single most powerful non-sentient object in existence; it is a decimalised measurement of objective power that each and every life needs to continue to exist.
• Women are not bound by honor, it’s an abstraction formed by men.
• Never love women as equal, always love them in a father-daughter way.
• Women do not care about a man’s struggles, only the results; always appear effortless.
• A man is always truly alone, there is nobody “higher up” for you to depend upon, you’re the end of the line, in the absence of a belief in God. This is why we are so sentimental with our memories and the older and more experienced the bastard, the more sentimental he will be, harbouring what is essentially a chamber of moments where he didn’t feel quite so alone, which a part of his fiber no matter how stoic and disciplined his consciousness may be will involuntarily and vicariously draw from for comfort in the darkest of times. These memories enter through the retina and ear canal, spend some short time in the brain and then continue to weigh on the heart slowly in varying measurements of weight until one’s dying breath. Wounds heal but scars are indeed forever. Every man has a burden he must carry, none of you are exempt, not even the psychopathic, as even a psychopath has their own feelings to contend with regardless of whether they care for yours.
• If you can imagine yourself being happy in spite of rejection, then “the power of no” becomes moot and you achieve outcome independence.
• With women it’s not you in and of yourself that they are attracted to, it’s your masculinity (esotericism of dominance) and how that makes them feel which they find attractive.
• Combine men’s predisposition to romanticise women with women’s Machiavellian nature and what we have is a disaster waiting to happen: a culture that brainwashes men to give in to their romantic instincts whilst dissecting and supplanting their masculinity with feminine sensibilities. These sensibilities then get mixed in with the male protector/provider instinct (masculine romanticism) in such a way as to make them hard to tell apart from one another.
• Feminized men think they must “impress women” and try to train themselves up to become the best dancing monkeys around in the hopes they’ll get laid. The masculinised version of game is “if she doesn’t like you, next the fuck out of her.”
• Stimulating a woman’s imagination is the single most potent talent you can learn in any context of a relationship.
• Improper debate such as taunting and reputation smearing almost always precede proper debate.
• Justification no matter the circumstance is seen as low value behaviour, an admission of guilt, a symptom of inferiority.
• When one acts reasonably in the face of deleterious emotion, it is because one’s will of mind has interjected, not because logic has won the psychological tug-of-war.
• Rationalisation is not typically an honest attempt to explain the intricacies of a situation via limited powers of observation and introspection, but more so a manifestation of sophistry to protect one’s reputation or ego.
• Women prefer to satiate their feelings whilst men prefer to make conscious, cost-benefit driven decisions.
• Woman’s love is extremely conditional, because unlike man’s it is parasitic rather than sacrificial.
• There is a hierarchy of love that trickles down. Man sacrifices for woman, and woman, for child. Rarely does the river flow upward.
• The more man sacrifices for a woman, the more likely he is to fall in love with his investment. The more a woman sacrifices for man absent of animal lust, the more repulsion she feels for him, interpreting her need for investment as a shortcoming on his part.
• A lack of tribe promotes these qualities (Machiavellianism and narcissism), as maladaptive qualities aid survival in the absence of cooperation and loyalty.
• When you meet a person you should try to ascertain whether they’re predisposed to altruism or sadism. Once you know this, you will be able to deduce whether they will betray you because it brings them pleasure, or would betray only if it were a last resort – eg: as a means to survive.
• The consequences of timidity are generally far worse than the consequences of boldness. Boldness pays, timidity costs.
• Rather than striving to be better than she is, womankind has become competent in pretending she need not be better because she already is what she isn’t – better.
• Don’t assign any real value to what a woman says when she speaks of morals or loyalty or other such topics.
• To be average is to be a loser.
• Maintain momentum, being inert is the worst; it’s a first class ticket to misery, and that’s exactly what most people are – miserable.
• Man is forced to realise he will never again be loved so profusely, for the boy gets his fill, but man loves the most to be loved the least. The profundity of maternal love is longed for, but forever gone.
• Marriage is the only legal contract in existence that permits a person to violate contractual terms and then subsequently penalise the party who upheld said terms.
• Money is more important than women. Chase money, not women. You are more likely to get women chasing money than you are to get money chasing women.
• Men control an interaction by being non-reactive. Women control an interaction by being hyper-emotional.
• A man’s manhood is deduced from the likeability of his actions, a woman’s womanhood is simply assumed by merit of her age.
• Leverage her emotions, change them so that they are conducive to rather than defiant of your goals. Know how to make her feel good, and her agreement will be yours.
• Women conflate histrionics with characteristic depth, because to women, depth is defined by interweaving hues of diverse emotional experience and how they relate to one another rather than an understanding of the abstract.
• The distinction between introspection and solipsism lies in that introspection assumes the external world is the root, attempting to understand where the individual fits in relation to said world. Solipsism assumes the individual is the root, and attempts to understand how the external world fits in with relation to the self. “What I think” becomes “I think that made me feel because…”
• Education neither imbues a woman with reason nor surgically eviscerates her vapidity. The educated woman is just as vapid as the uneducated, for vapidity is symptomatic of solipsism.
• Education does not give the unreasonable, reason, or the unintellectual, intellect.
• Simply put, in matters of the mind – education does not make women more like men; it imbues neither additional reason nor curiosity, only knowledge.
• AWALT presupposes that women are collectively governed by a set of underlying principles which drives their behaviour. For example, hypergamy, solipsism, Machiavellianism and immaturity are principles which make up the AWALT umbrella.
• In spite of this realization (AWALT), you have to make a commitment to your happiness and make the best out of the flawed creatures that are women. If you can’t or won’t do that, you’re going to go your own way and prove nature right: you need illusions to see women as investable.
• Do not trust those who overwhelm you with questions. They may simply be very curious, but it is more likely they are searching for dents in your armour. The line between curiosity and interrogation is thin, and people do not wear uniforms.
• I don’t respect women simply for being women, they have to earn my respect with good character. Cultivating a pleasing appearance earns lust, not respect. Most women don’t realise this, because beauty is power and feminism encourages narcissism, modern women believe they’re entitled to respect merely by merit of being female, doubly so if they’re attractive – this is not so.
• When a man has no mission other than to meet the needs of his woman, rest assured the woman in question will seek a man with a mission of his own. You see, women are so clueless and out of touch with what’s really good for them, that left to lead they will ruin every relationship with every man they ever have.
• A man who arches his back to enable a woman to step onto it and climb higher, creates a woman who will look down on him once her ascension has been realised. The naive, romantic man expecting to have his loyalty honoured will extend his hand from below, clasping at the heel of her shoe in expectation she will reward his efforts – but she will not. She will kick him down, and scoff with nothing but disgust for what she views as inferior neediness.
• Yes, women have entered highly prestigious professions such as medicine and law, but do the majority of women make major contributions to their fields, or do they just teach and practice the work of men who came before them, rather than endeavouring to truly excel in, innovate and push the boundaries of their chosen disciplines?
• Women trust their emotions far too much, they act on their emotions almost entirely without restraint, and often fail to question, analyse, check and hold their emotions to account.
• Losers consume, winners produce.
• If someone is expecting instant quick and effortless change, I already know they’re a loser. That’s not how life works. Marketing targets losers with bullshit promises of “easy, instant results” because it plays to the fantasy that greatness isn’t a matter of skill and dedication, but rather something that is monopolised and can be bought. It cannot, and this is false.
• Reality is politically incorrect, winners embrace this, losers don’t; sensibility is an expensive prison. Sensitive people tell you one thing straight from the get go without even intending to: they’re losers. Avoid sensitive people, not only do you have to waste energy watching what you do and don’t say, but seeing as they’re losers they have less to offer you.
• When someone attempts to undermine rather than refute you, they’re the enemy. Refutations are logical retorts, undermining is interrelational violence.
• In social matters, people do not reward he who is most logical, but rather he who is most impressive.
• Cunning and rhetoric almost always triumph over logic, fact and statistic in matters of persuasion.
• Simply put, women lack self-awareness, they tend to deny their shortcomings rather than fix them, and this is why there is a substantial lack of bodies in the women’s online self-improvement community.
• If you talk about the general nature of women to a woman, but you do not distinguish between her and “most women”, she will almost always lump herself in with “most women” and fail to make the distinction between herself and women as a whole. This leads her to constantly miss the forest for trees, stating that “she was in a similar situation and she was never like that” when you generalise her sex.
• Women are in a position of neediness, and yet they cannot fully trust men to give them what they need, so they manipulate men in order to give them what they want, but then resent the men who fall prey to such devices. This phenomenon alone should explain to you the mental hell women occupy, and explain much of their external craziness.
• A woman’s charm comes from her happiness, a man’s, from his confidence. An inconsolable woman’s as unattractive as a timid man.
• Men must earn value, women must preserve it. It is because of this very reason a woman’s age is taboo whilst a man’s is not. The passage of time fares man better than woman.
• Men manipulate nature, women manipulate men.
• In matters of women, entitlement and worthiness is a matter of false equivalence; her level of entitlement almost always exceeds what she is worth.
• A woman’s uppity moral facade is no more than a shaming mechanism designed to manipulate men into deference. Be shameless in your convictions, lest you allow her to co-opt you with guilt.
• In relationships, an alpha male will give false opportunities for exercising power (like picking curtain colours) whilst subjugating firmly when needed. The feminine ego necessitates an illusion of inconsequential power.
• A successful man is a man who makes something of himself, whereas a successful woman is a woman who manages to secure said man.
• A woman is a burden posing as partner, many a man expects a partner, but what he almost always gets is a dependent.
• From a solipsistic frame of reference, she is not “a real woman” should she remain single and childless beyond her peak years, and so by her own standards a man unaccomplished in this way is equally unactualised; such is the folly of women holding men to feminine standards of achievement.
• The quality of time is determined by three core factors: vision, energy and focus. Absent energy a man cannot act, absent vision he cannot strive, and absent focus he cannot actualise.
• People’s assumptions normally stem from the opinions they hold of themselves, the more emotional the individual, the more likely they are projecting.
• Be humble in success and egotistical in struggle, for ego is attractive in struggle, but redundant in achievement.
• One must note women’s unconditional loyalty to authority. She is obedient in much the way a child is, and it is this obedience which makes her prone to foolishness.
• Where the typical woman is manipulating in relationships but manipulable in matters of reality, the average man is manipulable in relationships and more finely astute of the abstract.
• Man’s most foolish visceralism is his propensity to conflate the beautiful with the virtuous, for in doing so, he invariably sees woman for who he’d like her to be rather than for who she is. It is this flaw of instinct in which man perceives virtue as an attendant characteristic of beauty that he inflicts on himself the self-detriment of intersexual naivety.
• A man acts upon, he is not acted upon, therefore if he wants, he does, he does not wait, he proceeds. A woman is the opposite.
• It is her nature to be dissatisfied with her station, and where she has little or zero problem, she will manufacture and amplify purely so she may enjoy the catharsis of complaining and all its attendant attention.
• Simply put, women covet the respect exclusive to men, but do not understand that the respect men receive is a substitute for the care they do not. That is, society does not fundamentally care for those it respects, in much the way it does not look to guidance from those under its care.