Call me a masochist, but I like conversing with Feminist leaning women when I get a chance. Thinking about, and writing about, Red Pill theory is my thing, and I find a lot of value in getting feedback from them. Not so much what they're actually saying, but how they react when the different foundations of the theory kind-of bang against their different inarguable premises.
The conversation started out with the casual implication that WOMEN ARE WONDERFUL. This one is rather interesting, because if you ever point it out in explicit terms, you'll get treated like an idiot: "uhh, dude, of course I know that women aren't all wonderful.... women are people, like anyone else!" But then, you can sit back and what the magic of how WOMEN ARE WONDERFUL implicitly plays out in a constant infinite feedback loop.
For example, when I mentioned how only men are able to be criticized socially- while women always seem to get a pass for poor behavior, of course she laughed with the claim that women receive "far more criticism" than men, but when pressed, she draws the designation that poor female behavior is the result of ultra-unfair social pressure, while poor male behavior is exclusively the responsibility of the individual man... This is, in fact, WOMEN ARE WONDERFUL in action; all women would be morally righteous if not for succumbing to social pressure, which compromises her agency- conversely, men enjoy full agency, so when a man misbehaves, it is his fault alone but also reflective of a morally corruptible male nature.
MALE NATURE was something she was willing to concede existed, and its existence was quite obvious; male nature stems from male sexuality, a kind of affliction which all men face (although we're only focusing on heterosexual men, to avoid the whole "gays are (somehow) wonderful" sidetrack); when asked, she said that "100%" of men would be attracted to a hypothetical 22-year-old with "great hair, big tits, and a small waist." The implication, of course, is that 100% of men would be easily led around by their dicks following around this genetic-unicorn of hotness, while doing whatever it took to get her panties off. So, MALE NATURE is something real, potent, and highly corruptible- which, of course, leads to the "MEN ARE AWFUL therefore WOMEN ARE WONDERFUL" dynamic.
Make no mistake, this dynamic is the foundation of "the blue pill," with the end-goal of blue pill men to achieve sexual success by way of disqualification. You see, they aren't like those awful, corrupt, probably rapist-type men; they suppress their demonized male nature, so they are not-at-all like the wrong kind of men, but instead, the good eggs, so therefore, since women are wonderful, should get the sex... because, remember, everything is sexual strategy.
But the truth of the matter is that MALE NATURE is real! We are hyper-sexual beings! We'd probably stick it in 80% of women if we could; in fact, we're in this mess because our fathers and grandfathers we're so godamn giddy over the invention of birth-control and the relaxing of sexual mores, a promised sexual utopia, that they dropped the fucking ball and let it all go! Thousands of years of careful Civilization building torn to the ground because, maybe, just maybe, you could stick your dick in a few more girls before dropping dead! That is MALE NATURE- yes, we're fucking horny.
The modern world is built around the notion that male nature is real, and must be contained... and, contrary to popular belief and constant female-chauvinist propaganda that wimpy blue pill men glady share on Facebook to virtue signal that they are the sex-worthy good apples, we've had social restrictions put in place to contain male sexuality, to the point where the containment of male sexuality has become an equally potent evolutionary component of male nature- namely, men understanding not to rape- both, by law, and by the carefully constructed system of men only remaining non-disposable by-way of retaining positive social value, and the understanding that rape entirely destroys the potential for social value and relevance; furthermore, the sympathetic love men have and protectorate identities that men create in regards to women will dictate that a man will not feel like a good man if a man rapes a woman. This is why you'll see FAR MORE WOMEN with a rape fantasy than men; it doesn't feel good for a man to feel like a rapist, it goes against all of his social and evolutionary programming, and, if anything, women intrinsically understand this and have a rape fantasy as the ultimate way of separating men who they perceive to "have balls" (willing to take what they want and rape; the ultimate needless Alpha who doesn't even need a woman's consent) from the men who are "good little listeners."
Of course, I couldn't get that far into the conversation with her, because as soon as the word "rape" came up at all, she got triggered and started feeling "nervous," which is just a way for her to control the conversation. The topic of rape, or Rape[TM], is the ultimate power-play a woman can have where the mainstream, blue pill worldview is that a man may not have an opinion about rape and must always defer to women, the perpetual rape victim- even if she's never been raped, but I'm sure if pressed, she'd have a heck of a rape story.
And when the idea of FEMALE NATURE came up, she wouldn't even begin to entertain the idea at all... of course, again implicitly referring back to WOMEN ARE WONDERFUL, while attacking me as childish, inexperienced, hateful, and heartbroken.
PRO TIP: Once you get her making those kinds of accusations, you hit the main nerve, and you've won the day.
So even if men has a highly corruptible, unifying MALE NATURE, all women are different, all women are individuals, and even if there are a few bad apples sprinkled into the bunch, NOT ALL WOMEN ARE LIKE THAT, or, in other words, there are no unifying commonalities between women that make it possible to understand women as a whole; this is the feminine mystique- or the idea that it's impossible to understand women. You'll see this idea regurgitated in sitcoms or Hollywood movies, where Prof. Blue Pill has a man-to-man talk with a misguided, romantically unsuccessful proto-Red Piller, where Dr. Pussy lays out the idea that women are complex, and unknowable, and deep, and superior... which is essentially the complete denial of a FEMALE NATURE, while the implicit demonization of MALE NATURE- male nature is what make men simple, stupid, easy to understand and potentially amoral; MALE NATURE is why blue pill men trip over themselves to share vox videos about nasty teenage "rapists" on Facebook; and understanding male nature as a toxic affliction that "100%" of men possess, by elimination, we can infer that WOMEN ARE WONDERFUL, and if women are wonderful, women should be allowed moral authority over all issues... which is how the patriarchy we destroyed, and why we're living in a cultural cesspool.
I then showed her my Social Matter article on my Red Pill origin story, and the theoretical foundation of the Red Pill, "Baby Did a Bad, Bad Thing," and she flipped the fuck out, saying: "I feel like your whole point is boiling down to, 'women are materialisrtic whores who only want Alpha males and that is why they should be treated as such'," which, of course misses the entire point. Human nature is amoral, which is why we need social restrictions on the more destructive aspects of it- this used to come in the form of religion, or law, or even social taboo- but the modern world only works to contain and demonize male behavior. And that last part, that they should be "treated as such," is exactly how the mainstream world thinks of men.
Aren't women wonderful?
Like this post? Check out my blog KILL TO PARTY- Updated with: The Narrative of Heartbreak and “Big” (1988)
PantsonFire1234 8y ago
Women don't like the idea of them sucking or being losers. Whilst men are introduced to the dynamic of winning/losing in competition from an early age, women stay away from such pressures. Their value is set from birth mostly, so this is understandable.
The problem is that our society tells women to get an ego. And egos can only be sated by competition and winning, ascending the ladder if you will. Which women can't. This is the root of all problem with women. They cheat because they want to feel as if they are improving, whilst they ain't. They try to grow financially thinking they are increasing their value, while they aren't, they boss men around trying to 'win'- the list goes on but you get the point.
The root of all bad female behavior comes from this idea of wanting to be like men (without the downsides). Fucking, improving, badmouthing, leading and everything else are signs women are trying to emulate men. Women even think they are equally strong as a man.
Nature however, doesn't give a shit about women's feelz and ill advised fantasies. So all their efforts end up being in vain. They didn't improve, usually they actually lost value.
Modern women can't stand this reality. They want to win from men so badly. They want to experience the male side of life so badly. Yet nature has kept this from them by virtue of being female. And they can't handle this reality.
The modern women has a bad case of penis envy. Women are losers.
An_Ignorant 8y ago
I agree with you, specially on the denial of female nature.
While men are encouraged by society to suppress their nature, I'm not going to act like society doesn't make everyone suppress their sexual nature.
Women are sexual as well. Women are also encouraged to suppress that sexual, manipulative nature and at times their desire for attention and even narcissistic inclinations.
In fact, I clould blame most feminist thoughts on the narcissistic female nature. I'm not going to, but I know it's a factor.
But as society stands, the majority accepts the demonized version of the male sexuality and deny the female one to the point that a female raping a male is considered a joke, and that's not just a feminist thought, that's pretty much an universal one.
Steve_Wiener 8y ago
where are women told to suppress their sexual nature besides religious communities? I don't see it. They are just encouraged to be coy and deceitful about it, aka "good girl" game
Submissively_yours 8y ago
In my experience, modern women are often shamed by their female peers for not being hypersexual. Women tend towards being similar to each other/agreeing with each other, that much is pretty well-documented psychology. You put a chaste girl into a hookup culture college, and it's very unlikely she makes it through without assimilating (assuming she isn't fat/ugly).
deville05 8y ago
I read your article on intellectual alchemy.. N dont you think that the world world at any given time in history os based on intellectual alchemy? Based on little unquestionable premises... Culture, religion, right and wrong, society, political systems etc.. All stem from Ideologies that are rigid and unevolving. So are the truth seekers wrong? As in are we people seeking to disregard these rigid Ideologies.. Anti-social?
Stythe 8y ago
Whenever I read this stuff I remember the tines in my life when I just wanted to make out and maybe touch a boob. I think about how unpopular and how much of a loser I was and how nobody gave a shit and how I just couldn't understand why, when I was such a legitimately interesting, hard working and cool guy nobody would give a shit about me enough to even be interested.
Now, after trying and failing and not giving up, now when Ive improved to a point where I don't have a problem getting laid, when I have a game plan for a job and look pretty good, I see how much bullshit was fed to me growing up.
I dealt with the anger and sadness that came from it and I get it and am okay with it, but I look at the world and just feel a sadness about a lot of it. I also notice how it's always really fat, gross people who always wear superhero shirts and I laugh.
microwave44 8y ago
This. Then the nerds that have star wars wallets
Except for that one super-buff roid guy who wore a superman tanktop and superman hat. Guy was massive and he knew it.
BluepillProfessor 8y ago
Truth. I feel sad that so many men, and women, have lost their way. These ball busting, hard charging women who emasculate the men in their lives are not happy in the least. All of them are desperately unhappy. Meanwhile the weak, pussy whipped, defeated men who are emasculated are also desperately unhappy.
I look around and I used to feel blinding rage. Now I just feel sad. So many lost souls. So many lies. For what? So men are disincentivized from working hard and taking chances? So women can Lord it over men and torment them with their power even though this obviously makes them desperately unhappy?
Sad. That is the word for it.
Stythe 8y ago
The thing I've realized is that people simply don't want to see reality. Nothing you say or do can change their opinion, the best you can do is point them in the right direction and hope they follow.
It's not my job to fix a world I didn't break. Hell, I don't even much care about doing the "right thing" anymore. I just find it sad to see people I care about living in ways that make them unhappy. But that's their choice. I'll do my thing and be an example of what I want. They can follow if they like it or not if they don't. It's up to ever individual to live How they want.
SkorchZang 8y ago
Saving the world is the typical wish of a petty SJW tyrant. That whole imposition of "how we know things should be", by shrill force. Superhero shirts don't even look at the world rightly, they can't see shit, but they're already sure how to save everyone from all this mystery and pain, to make it their version of proper and suppressed, and pure.
There is no need to save the world, there never was and never will be. The dimwit arrogance of the whole idea is staggering. If you manage to really save yourself, just watch as thousands save themselves around you, following one man's good example. Without needing to be told what to do for 8 hours a day in class - good examples tend to speak for themselves & need no cheerleaders.
razormachine 8y ago
Nope, being the hero is a typical SJW wish. They do not care about the results, they do not want to really fix anything, they just want the hero status with the least work and risks from their side.
MAN on the other hand fix things that need to be fixed, and build things that need to be built. Woman gather around the feminism AKA "we want the larger piece of the cake movement", man gather around the environment AKA "fix the ecosystem" movement.
Wanting to fix the social system doesn't make you a SJW. Joining the feminism movement so that you have a large female audience to view you as their hero while you work against your own gender is a SJW thing.
However although a man feels the need to fix the whole social system, he really shouldn't. When society finally brakes down man will once again be on the top. So sit back and enjoy the ride... feel free to "help out" the crumbling society system downfall by not letting yourself be used as a provider.
james-watson 8y ago
This is not about "saving the world".
This is about survival. Weak men lead to weak societies, which leads to death and failure.
Men instinctively know when they are in a weak position, and it makes us very nervous. We are one disaster or war away from being utterly helpless. Our enemies are not resting on their laurels. They are becoming stronger, while we continue to emasculate ourselves.
A group of atomized, unorganized and disloyal men are ants to be crushed by a cohesive group of loyal and organized warriors.
Strength is all that matters. And we are weak. Weaker than we have ever been. Our weakness is another's opportunity. Sooner or later, they will take it.
Stythe 8y ago
This is pretty much the jist of it. People who feel they HAVE to help, lole it's an obligation of some kind, simply miss the big picture. Nothing is wrong, things just are. You do what you want with it. Those people are projecting their own problems onto the world and so they see themselves as some kind of wannabe hero. My old example was to be the most patient and understanding person ever, because I never had those things growing up. That's how I ended up dating a BP drug addict and ruining my shit. But owning it is also how I grew the fuck up.
Now I do my thing. I see thise who like and appreciate it and thise who don't. The ones who like it get closer, the ones who don't stay away. In the end I just do me.
[deleted] 8y ago
Feminists love to demonize men until they need us, which they do for anything that requires significant amounts of physical exertion, aggression, rational thinking, willpower or long term planning. Definitely penis envy.
HumanSockPuppet 8y ago
Arguing with feminists amounts to little more than mental masturbation. You won't persuade them of anything, and you'll only expose yourself by openly questioning them.
Just bear this in mind if your projected career path puts your profits on a collision course with the feminine imperative.
LastRevision 8y ago
Agreed- I do it for sport, as more of a thought exercise than attempting to change anyone's mind. It's always good for me to examine the foundations of the theory, and get a sense for what parts of it cause emotional responses.
HumanSockPuppet 8y ago
I find that feminism really has no foundations. It is simply a series of rationalizations constructed around each woman's in-built AF/BB process.
And as for emotional reactions - well, that's women in a nutshell. They exist as a cauldron of feelings - sometimes complementary, sometimes conflicting, but always chaotic. That is why they depend upon men to create and enforce order.
Naruto94 8y ago
Exactly. Most of their arguments get messed up just by saying "turning the table". It's fun to watch them flip by their own logic of gender equality.
KyfhoMyoba 8y ago
The first rule of Fight Club is YOU DON'T TALK ABOUT FIGHT CLUB.
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and it really annoys the pig.
_orion 8y ago
gays arn't wonderful, their fabulous. sorry i couldn't resist, nohate
[deleted]
NeoreactionSafe 8y ago
The Red Pill is truth and the Blue Pill is mythology.
Our advantage is that since we embrace truth we are actually correct.
However, a mythology, like all lies, can have great power.
[deleted]
gtypoDD22 8y ago
the mythology also makes people feel better.
mustard5 8y ago
I think it's important to draw a distinction between mythology and culture.
Culture would be a better word for the social forces that the red pill rails against. Mythology actually supports the red pill. The mythology of women doesn't pull any punches with regards to the ensnaring qualities and the dangers of succumbing to the feminine. You have the Sirens tempting sailors onto the rocks, bringing on their death and destruction. You have the goddess Kali, who wears the heads of men as an adornment on her body. These mythological stories are not blue pill ideas.
The cultural of feminism, urban industrialization and the nanny state is more accurately the agent of ideas that are antithetical to innate biological imperatives of being a man. Terence McKenna is popularly quoted as saying "Culture is not your friend." I was watching a documentary by Terence and his brother in which I recall him saying something along the lines that in a gathering of two people, culture exists as the third person in the conversation.
My point is that culture is the illusion. Mythology is the primal truth contained in abstraction, through symbolism and allegory.
grubek 8y ago
Short term maybe, but it makes them feel worse long term. Keep failing because your understanding of reality is faulty is not fun at all.
[deleted] 8y ago
Nail on the head like always. Mythology is about the best word to describe feminism, liberalism, and the other -ism's that all fall under the umbrella of Blue Pill indoctrination. Why society is doing this to itself I do not know. We see the deleterious effects. The most 'enlightened' liberal societies like Germany have negative native birth rates. Blue Pill is a parasite that is literally killing it's host. Any disease/parasite that kills it's host is very ineffective because then it won't have any carriers. That's the nature of Blue Pill, it just doesn't even care about self-preservation and in fact also demonizes that instinct. That is the base instinct of all life......
stawek 8y ago
This is the effect of democracy, which unites women with alpha males.
Think about it: who is the most important group in elections? Women (it is not that there are more women who vote, but they will consistently vote for their own group, while men vote for their own individual benefits). Who sets up the rules of elections and then runs the governments? Alpha males.
Now examine the wants of women as compared to alpha males.
women want alpha dicks. Alpha want women. Check.
women want beta bucks. Alpha men want beta bucks for their bastards and somebody to orbit their plates, so they don't demand too much attention from them. Check.
women want to fuck around without being shamed. Alphas know that they will get all that sex. Plus, they don't care about their plates n-counts. Check.
women don't want their beta husbands to have any power over them. Alpha males don't want betas able to control their wifes, cause they couldn't cheat with them. Check.
women want social safety net. Alphas want to normalize single motherhood for the benefit of all their bastards (plus, women that aren't scared of pregnancy are easier to fuck). Check.
As you can see, all the points of hypergamy benefit the main block of voters (women) and the people who set up the elections - alpha males. Betas are outnumbered, simple as that.
Democracy inevitably leads to this outcome: alpha males who want to run harem society and women who enjoy such society working together to fuck over betas.
I know it comes as a shock to any American, but democracy is a bullshit system. Pretty much every societal system will eventuallly approach this equlibrium - powerful men working with women towards enslavement of average men. The only hope is extremely small governments, bordering on anarchy. Which is what US were at the beginning of their existence (while other countries at the same time were burdened by their noblemen).
PantsonFire1234 8y ago
Don't forget that Alpha's want women to suck so they can suck their cocks. You are framing things as if women are getting what they want and winning at life. They are not. They are losing, constantly trying to catch Chad and get his commitment. But the reality is that they are not of high enough value.
stawek 8y ago
They aren't winning, but they think they can. By the time they realize their errors they are well post wall and nobody cares about them anymore.
The deck is stacked for the benefit of women. Any decent looking girl can sail through life without working a single day. Decent, not even super hot.
PantsonFire1234 8y ago
They think Chad is within their league and the only reason he doesn't commit is because "he's an asshole". They tell themselves this lie over and over again until they either hit the wall or Chad commits to someone else. The most delusional ones keep trying, completely oblivious to their limits in value.
In this world the only people that truly benefit is Alphas. Women are simple accomplishes who are easily fooled. They think they are partners in crime with these Alpha's, while in fact they are only used.
The joke will and has always been, on sluts and betas. We use them for our benefit.
[deleted] 8y ago
Follow the money. I can't say I know anything but things start to add up. NRS has all kinds of "crazy" shit to say about that, dude's infected my brain (or disinfected my brain, depending how you look at it...). Is there something more powerful/motivating than money to follow or incentivize? The effect cascades because big money is never made alone, and think of what a person will do to secure a large investment.
NeoreactionSafe 8y ago
If you have an hour to spare you can let David Icke explain how it all works:
https://youtu.be/DAppBHbSS-k
The Blue Pill is our programming to be good slaves.
joseph177 8y ago
I wonder how many people fall for the dividing/conquering aspect of redpill. It's very hard to present truth, but very easy to present an enemy.
Cat_pun_o_tron 8y ago
Any way to get a short version? Videos make me sleepy.
NeoreactionSafe 8y ago
Which is of higher value to you... an hour playing a video game or an hour learning how power works in the real world?
Cat_pun_o_tron 8y ago
A tldw that saves me an hour would be preferable to either really.
NeoreactionSafe 8y ago
Why learn anything?
When you ignore things then if they are unpleasant you get to avoid them and be in a state of pure happiness.
Ignorance is Bliss.
Why fix what isn't broken?
"Just Be Yourself".
Cat_pun_o_tron 8y ago
I mean, what's unpleasant is listening to a very dry lecture. The information itself isn't something I am trying to avoid. I prefer information in a readable format- books, text. It's not so much desiring ignorance as desiring the information in an alternative medium, I.E. a short paragraph hitting all the major bullet points.
NeoreactionSafe 8y ago
David Icke is very interesting to watch.
This video is his most tame... typically he gets really "out there".
Try the video. You will learn more about the real world in an hour than hundreds of hours in a textbook of controlled disinformation.
MiyuzakiOgino 8y ago
I like how there was no statistics or nothing to further your point, while all the mater ignoring how men can have a deviance in sexuality. Even when regarding people that are AWARE and are cognizant of their sexuality, i.e. gay, bi, queer, pan men. So they get lumped out, and somehow status quo falls back to how 80/100% of men would bone? Wild.
666mafioso 8y ago
You have a great train of thought, but I kind of lost you where you began saying, "It's true! Men are hyper-sexual beings!" I don't deny this personally, but to tell a female, better yet a feminist, that we are like this because it's in our biological nature will only waste your time.
Firstly, she won't ever understand on a physical level. Nor will she want to. Next, it will just reinforce her exaggerated ideas that men are all innately evil tyrannical rapists (which I actually embrace this fear, for my own benefit).
I suggest that you continue to prod her (no pun intended) with rational arguments, and watch as she unravels her own logic. I almost feel bad for feminists because they want to employ their own "logic" and "rational" arguments to combat us, but it's something they are not wired to be good at. When they do this, we get home court advantage.
Ultimately, females are losing by not "sticking to their guns", or simply just trying to get better at what they're good at. Just look at the intense backlash Zarna Joshi, the "activist" who got triggered over hearing "Hugh Mungus", is getting from all sides. Maybe the world is starting to realize that all this "equality" rhetoric is getting ridiculous.
virusofthemind 8y ago
How times have changed.
Zarna Joshi would have been sectioned for an outburst like that even 40 years ago. She would have been sectioned now if Hugh had brought along his friends Mike Oxbig and Hugh G Rection...
Cunt_Robber 8y ago
Don't forget Mike Litoris, the one friend with the crude sense of humor
microwave44 8y ago
Ben Dover and Yourab Itch should join too
Also if i ever have a daughter, i swear on my balls i'll call her Nina.
Nina Leven.
Cunt_Robber 8y ago
Nina Leven you sonofabitch that's one a whole new level haha
Steve_Wiener 8y ago
the quality of your posts has improved. the title hits a major truth and reason why things are so fucked up
stemgang 8y ago
Thanks for doing the dangerous work for us. I hope you're not letting these feminists know your real name.
getwoke 8y ago
Bravo -- as a young supplicant sensitive and sexless beta boy, I would bristle at the statement often parrotted by women and girls going through their intellectual indoctrination.
"all men are pigs!"
( I'm not. I'm different. I care about you. I would never hurt you in any way,, I'd treat you with respect always like my clueless socially awkward pops suggested. Will you fuck me? )
Newish to red pill philosophy, it has been a game changer to say the least. I've yet to engage anyone other than my SJW sister in discussion/debate on any issues ( she promptly blocked me on FB/text after a 3 message exchange ) -- still feel the sword needs sharpening but looking forward to some great opportunities to establish intellectual dominance or at least make some grown women cry.
Appreciate your thoughts, consider me a @KTP fan.
scarletspider3 8y ago
Don't ever tell a female about Red Pill. Now she's gonna go around telling other women to stay away from you.
Submissively_yours 8y ago
Or she ends up at RPW and taking the pill. You never know. And a woman telling another woman to stay away can sometimes make you more appealing.
Cunt_Robber 8y ago
One of the best articles (and the links too--I've checked out every one of them and you're an amazing writer!) I've read in the past few months here. Your rhetoric is superior and your points crisp. I can't believe that I've come such a long way from being blue pill and a sucker for the feminine mystique to understanding every single aspect of female thought and behavior.
Men obviously always must be one step ahead of women in order to keep perpetuating the species--women will not let a lesser man fuck them. It seems like these days women's minds are as clouded by feminist ideals as men's are with blue-pillness. The only difference is that there's no reasoning with their hamster--they have the victim card, sexuality, the feminine mystique to help them feel better about themselves even if they're wrong--whereas men must constantly face challenges and change/adapt to stay ahead and find success. It's not men's fault, it's not our species' fault, it's nature. That's how we evolved. Now if women will just admit it and accept it already... but wait, they can't. It's in their nature.
Great read, thanks!
mustard5 8y ago
It may not look like it to you at the moment, or maybe you love the thrill of danger, but the wisdom of the ages advises against this type of pastime. :-D
"Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces."
It's not that they won't appreciate what you say. It's that you will become the 'enemy' for daring to bring the truth to the blind. You run the risk of being attacked and torn to pieces by a pack of savage animals that don't appreciate truth.
Better to preach to those who will benefit from what you have to say? I guess it's a personal choice, but I know I've never gotten any satisfaction from it in the past. Just recently I made the mistake of arguing with a feminist on facebook and was hounded by her pack of white knights. I threw some punches back through some verbal sparring, but it wasn't a very productive pursuit.
Submissively_yours 8y ago
If you never debate anyone or never experience the "other side" and their arguments, you just create a woman-hating echo chamber, instead of actually gaining information and furthering the advancement of your perspective.
But obviously, do it anonymously.
Yashugan00 8y ago
I spoke to a feminist. She's lesbian but thinks every man in the street is out to rape her, but get this: she's particularly offended that someone with a menial job might try it. You know, because undeserving and beneath her status. Like there's a revenge plot going on that is systematic in society. Whilst in contrast to that, the reality is she's highly paid and respected for her skill, with a great social life and everyone is casual with her sexual orientation. I asked and no-one has made any untoward advances. I think that's pretty delusional