Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
- Main Forums
- What's Hot
- TRP.RED
- Tribe Forums
- TheRedPill
- Tribe Management
- Create New Tribe
- Manage My Tribes
- Find New Tribes
- Recent News
-
-
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 11mo ago Stickied
Allow me to remind all about rule #3: No comments saying a post is fake without proof. If there is proof, do send it our way such that we can remove any fake post.
There have been some good replies; let's keep them in line with the rules. More important than pointing the finger and laughing is learning how to spot red flags out in the wild and act accordingly. But, yes, let's point the finger and laugh.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 11mo ago Stickied
I'm late to the party on this one, but I want to add a few thoughts:
Relevant portion of rule 3:
A) it's annoying and detracts from the discussion.
B) it almost always comes from a belief that no woman can possibly be this awful of a person, because they're all magical creatures of pure goodness who fart rainbows and shit diamonds.
C) skepticism and doubt are good, but don't be that guy who has to verbalize his doubt at everything. that guy is fucking annoying.
D) "I have room for doubt" isn't proof that something is fake.
Profitglutton Jr. Hamster Analyst 11mo ago
I like this rule. I see way too many men (especially men) claiming stories are fake without proof simply because the story shows a woman in a negative light.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 11mo ago
Generally speaking, if I have doubt, it’s more just due to it being me assuming that no human being could be so dysfunctional. But then again, the internet has taught me that horrific female behavior knows no limits.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 11mo ago
I didn't laugh in that this is a tragic situation. I feel bad for the girl and, quite frankly, don't think she's all that bad compared to regular college women who slut it up and then quietly become born-again virgins. The guy was offended because "anyone could sleep with her for money" as compared to her being a chad chaser.
On the contrary, "alpha widows" or women who slept around with nothing but "hot guys" probably have their pair-bonding abilities burned out more than escorts who slept with normal men.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 11mo ago Stickied
I disagree. She is worse than a slut.
A true slut does not think there is anything wrong with fucking around. She does not think it is immoral. This girl knows it is immoral and she still did it for the money.
Her husband is right. The only difference between a prostitute on the street and this "escort" was the price. In fact, a prostitute who accepts who she is and what it means is above her in station. A prostitute who is open about who she is and is accepting of the consequences of her life has my respect. I am pretty sure she might get respect from the husband in this story as well. This lying whore does not. She is utterly immoral without taking any ownership for it and all I can think of at the end of this story was how she still got the money. If there is a lesson, it is that. The man has my sympathy. This lying whore will only have my contempt.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 11mo ago
I don't want to be argumentative so I'll try to explain the nuance of what I'm saying with this question: Is a slut better because she's giving it away for "free" rather than money? TRP is about accepting difficult truths which is that nearly all women are now prostitutes. Golddiggers are prostitutes. Even chad-chasers are whoring for social status by sleeping with desirable men (my ex had a schoolteacher who bragged about sleeping with JFK).
The great lie of feminism was that if women were "equal" and "earned their own way", they'd stop being whores because then they could pay their own bills. Heck, consider how career women engage in hypergamy and refuse to get into a relationship where they're not prostituting themselves "refuse to marry down" meaning that they have plenty of money, but they insist on MORE. AWALT.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 11mo ago
Having an argument is fine, provided it is conducted in a mutually respectful manner.
A slut who is open about being a slut is better than her: a lying whore. That does not make a slut worthy of a marriage. It is not a question of chastity here; it is about morality. Her personal moral scale and whether she is true to it. On the scale of chastity and femininity, neither a slut nor a whore will measure up to a virgin. In reality (and in trp theory), a lot of men are ok with low n count women but are not ok with high n count women because of a measure of chastity and morality. AWALT does not mean AWALT all the time. It is not to be taken literally. AWALT is a motto to remind you to stay vigilant and to not put anyone on a pedestal. A former whore who owns up to what she did and is willing to be one for her boyfriend is acceptable to a lot of men. She might not be acceptable to you and me, but that is besides the point.
The marketing words of feminism does not mask the true nature of the women who pushed for it and cling to it. I have wrote a post before about traditional women. While they are better than feminists, they are not to be put on a pedestal either. AWALT.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 11mo ago
I appreciate your point and don't condone her dishonesty but note that sluts also are rarely honest about their past. Heck, that's why the first thing sluts do when they're in dual-mating mode to settle down is act all traditional and "play hard to get" to signal to a beta male that she's virtuous because she's not giving up to him cheaply.
I can sympathize with the guy. I just bought a brand new car for the New Year's deals and I'd be pissed too if the car had 100,000 miles on it instead of 57 no matter how great the condition looks, otherwise.
We all have different ways we process emotions. For example: If I found out my wife was cheating on me, I'd be enraged but if I found out she did this kind of work before meeting me, I'd probably not be as upset since we weren't in a relationship at the time. IMO, nearly all women are whores in one regard or another including the demands us men be breadwinners while it's optional for them.
It is, as I think the angry husband said, we know what they are but we're just haggling over price.
Chad chasers IMO are more damaged than women who just slept with normal guys for money. I'd like to hear your thoughts on that concept.
Profitglutton Jr. Hamster Analyst 11mo ago
I feel sorry for the guy but especially the daughter. It’s possible to keep a coparenting relationship amicable with apps that allow the parents to only talk through apps about the Chile and nothing else. I think he may be too hurt to consider that option right now but hopefully he’ll come around.
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 11mo ago
I get your point; I too don't think there's a major difference between an escort and your average party slut. However, what makes her evil is not the sex work per se, but covering up her tracks to a point the guy got married and had a kid. At any point she could have come foward with an edited version of her past (let's be honest here, no way in hell would she willingly admit to being a whore because she was too lazy to find real work or too entitled to join the army) - she had a "phase", she "hung around with a bad crowd and did things she's not proud of", she had "people" helping her pay her tuition, she had "many abusive exes". She knew she would be dumped for her past, and so decided to fabricate one instead.
As for the differences between the whore and the slut - besides the payment upfront -, I think there are three main ones, though it could be argued that this is no more than splitting hairs. The first one is the stigma - and while society is too lenient on sluts, they're still somewhat more accepted than a bona fide streetwalker. Even a human mattress looks down to pros. The second one is that a slut has poor moral compass; a hooker either has none or is willing to ignore hers for sufficient money. And the third - and most dangerous - one is the compartmentalisation. The tramp may eventually try to erase her easy past but, in doing so, she'll have to erase too much - thus creating a whole block of missing information, a big telltale sign for those looking for red flags. The lady of the night, on the other hand, will have an easier time pretending that her career never happened, unless the guy really digs into her past or gets lucky like the one in the story.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 11mo ago
Yup, the real problem here is that she failed to give this man an opportunity to choose. If she told him enough of her past for him to understand and he stayed, it’s no longer something that she needs to worry about.
Instead, this man was basically tricked into a marriage. He feels violated, and he should.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 11mo ago
Exactly.
Dorballom08 11mo ago
Any tldr guys? Thanks.
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 11mo ago
Sometimes I really wish the things we find are nothing more than a writing exercise - but time and time again reality imposes itself.
A woman who grew with two loving parents and could have worked her way through university, could have borrowed money from banks, could have joined the military, decided that work was too much work, and whoring was a far easier option. And, deciding to not face the consequences of her own actions, lied her way into marriage. Now there's a guy facing the worst pain one can imagine, and a girl who'll grow up in a broken home (and possibly follow her mom's footsteps). But hey, at least she didn't have to get a real job.
ogrilla99 Pez "The Pussy Dispenser" Pimp 11mo ago Stickied
Yeah this is where I lost any sympathy. She wasn't some runaway child trafficked into prostitution against her will. She wasn't a homeless mother forced to street walk to feed her children. She was a college student. You can get loans for 100% of your tuition plus living expenses if you want. Yes, that leaves you with a big burden after graduation but you can still do it.
Even work wise, when she mentioned she met a friend at an expensive bar, I thought that was the job she was going to get. If you're attractive enough to escort, you can make bank as a bartender or waitress say expensive bars, restaurants, or even night clubs. Manhattan is filled with places where a pretty girl can wear a slutty outfit and earn hundreds of dollars a night without having to actually do anything more than flirt with customers and wait tables.
Heck if none of those work, drop out for a year, work full time, and come back. There's no shame in it and employers might even give you points for being so determined to finish your degree.
She chose prostitution. The admission of drugs and alcohol use is the key. She was already in the NYC party life (the real reason she wanted to go to an NYC college rather than something cheaper in her home state), and dropping out to work would mean most likely going back home. She wanted a way to stay in New York to continue her Sex and the City lifestyle, and didn't want a real job that comes with responsibilities like showing up on time. If you could escort a couple times in a week and pay your tuition, why not? To a woman who doesn't value her body, her chastity, or her virtue, it's a good trade-off.
The further tell is that she continued to escort. If she really could earn a semester's tuition in a week, then she could have escorted for 6 weeks and have enough for the rest of college. But she continued to escort throughout her college years. Why? To fund her lifestyle of drugs, alcohol, and Manolo heels which was the real reason for her needing so much money.
College was just an excuse. What she really wanted was the NYC hedonistic life and she was willing to prostitute herself to obtain it. Her husband is correct in figuring this out and tossing her to the curb.
The only thing I would do differently is I'd probably fight for custody of the child. Assuming it's his biological child, I personally would find it difficult to cut ties with her. But I agree with a quick divorce, without some "trial separation" or therapy or other nonsense.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 11mo ago
As @hornetsfalcons12 put it,
It is apparent that his current mental state is similar to that of a rape victim. It is clear that he does not want to deal with this woman on any level. That is reflected in the settlement he has offered, even though he did not have to be this generous. I would not have been anywhere this generous because I am a wrathful bastard and I would not have had any qualms about using her past against her if it came to it.
[deleted]
[deleted]
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 11mo ago
Yeah even strippers cope and whine and demand to be called "Exotic Dancers."
Like, bitch, you take your clothes off for money at minimum, if not more. Stop trying to church it up, Dirt.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 11mo ago
yeah, strippers even leave off the word 'exotic'. They just say that they are dancers. When they stop dancing, they change it slightly to 'teacher', as in 'I used to teach dance' or 'I have dance classes'.
Stripers / exotic dancers / dancers / teachers ....what they mean is whore. They were a whore.
[deleted]
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 11mo ago
While you do make some valid points, we must abide by rule #3 - thus, I'm removing all posts that violate it. Besides, this sub is not about debating how things could or could not be. As a better mod than myself has put:
The women in these posts do not matter. The situations in these posts do not matter. What matters is that we learn to make the right decisions if we ever come across these situations, with the added benefit of making fun of these (possibly imaginary) people (since we are a humor sub after all).
If, however, any kind of proof can be provided that the original post is fake, this (and any other) post will be deleted.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 11mo ago
spoken like a gentleman. Apologies for slip up.
[deleted]
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 11mo ago
Which is the same as 'written by a man' ...because AI (along with everything else of any value in the 20th and 21st century) is created by men.
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 11mo ago
Removed. Rule #3.
[deleted]
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 11mo ago
Removed. Rule #3.
[deleted]
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 11mo ago
Maybe, maybe not. It would matter if these women mattered. What matters is the lesson that can be learned from these posts.
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 11mo ago
Removed. Rule #3.
I also must tag you, @redpillschool.
[deleted]
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 11mo ago
Removed. Rule #3.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 11mo ago
Upon re-reading a bit more closely, its written in a ramblematic style so I don't blame you for missing it - but a man came up to their table as she left for the restroom. But I do agree that any dude would 'read' the situation and not say shit, even there.
In any case, even if this whole story is fake, there are plenty of whores on OnlyFans and elsewhere that all expect their past actions to have zero consequences. They don't even think about it, its all about the short-term "I'm making sooooo much money" dopamine hit they get.
It ends as you suspect, with her being labeled as a broken whore. The one part of the story that seemed authentic was her horror at everyone finding out. Her social network is her lifeblood, women hate it when they're ostracized or cast out, so this seemed real.
Anyway, whores are whores no matter what camoflauge they wear.
Isn't that the truth.
[deleted]
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 11mo ago
Since I don't think removed posts can be later approved*, instead of outright removing yours, I'll ask you to edit to conform to rule #3. It has some good points that would be best preserved.
*Once again, @redpillschool. Terribly sorry, but I must tag you whenever possible. It's the law.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 11mo ago
There is a restore option for comments, but it might only be visible after you refresh or if you come back to the comment again.
Tagging @redpillschool was the right thing to do, especially when there was nothing he has to do.
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 11mo ago
Ah, so there is. Refreshing the page really does the trick.
Edit: @redpillschool.
Edit again: huh, it doesn't seem to work.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 11mo ago
You forgot to tag @redpillschool.
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 11mo ago
Indeed. I wonder if editing a post to add a tag works. Does it, @redpillschool?
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 11mo ago
Afaik, it does. You need to refresh when you edit and tag @redpillschool.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 11mo ago
Let's test that again, because I forgot if that works or not.
Edit: tag @Impressive-Cricket-8
redpillschool Everybody tag him 11mo ago
Thanks for the tags.. it's nice to be remembered
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 11mo ago
Especially when you're old.
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 11mo ago
Alas, it was the refreshing once again. @redpillschool.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 11mo ago
Assuming this is true, but even if not:
Never send a woman to college. Every single thing about college is detrimental to her purpose and success as a woman.
Don't be a Boomer dad, blindly trusting the system and sending your girls into a cultural cesspool without guidance or support... during the most formative/vulnerable years of their life. They rack up debt and useless degrees (and n-count) that make them less marriageable than if they just got married out of high school. Every single thing about it is bad for women. Don't waste their time or your money. I don't care how bright you think she is. The smarter the woman, the more she will realize she shouldn't be there.
No-Stress-Cat 11mo ago
I feel bad for the guy. I don't think any guy would have seen this coming. This girl was slick. She would have taken her secret to the grave, and he would have been none the wiser.
Apparently, the universe was looking out for him. The only reason he found out was he just happened to take her on a trip to NYC, just happened to go to a bar where a former client of hers was at, and just happened to have the guy wander over and start asking questions. What are the odds?
As ogrilla99 mentioned above, what we have here is a girl who chose to spend 4 years in a NYC college. That in itself is red flag. I don't blame her ex-husband from Bumfucknowhere, South Dakota for not knowing that the local college didn't offer a Doctorate in Underwater Basket Weaving. I can say he should have had some kind of clue something was amiss when he fucked her for the first time and found her to be so loose it was like fucking a bucket of water.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 11mo ago
Total myth.
I've had exes who were absolute hobags, but their pussies were still tight.
A pecker or two (or two score or even two hundred) just isn't going to permanently stretch a vagina.
No-Stress-Cat 11mo ago
Of course, I'm over exaggerating. Back in the day, prostitutes would put alum on their coochies to make them tight again. Which is where the phrase "powder her puss" comes from.
"Two score and two hundred peckers ago..." Preach it, Brother!
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 11mo ago
Regardless of whether she has a loose pussy, she has very loose morals. The former can be genetics and is not to be held against someone. The latter is always a choice and is to be held against such people.