Some women I meet hate the idea where they need to come to me first. I always say it's up to a girl to come first (if a chick really likes a guy she'll do anything to come to him).

If I come to her house at first, then she leaves me or something, it puts her in place of power (sheep coming to a shepherd). She got a free ride, attention and didn't give anything in return.

Some women said to me that all of their boyfriends all came to their place/city. They just went outside and that's it. They actually were with those guys. Doesn't that put those guys as a half-alpha? They gave in, got to a girl, maybe even slept with her, but all in all the girls was in control of the logistics.

I don't live in the USA and not everything relies on a car. Trains, metros, buses, walk... Some of them give an excuse or a basic flake "it's too far away" even though I know in bigger countries or cities some of them drive even more than 1 hour.

Ofc since the culture is like that, some of them don't have drivers licence immediately, they get it later in life - another excuse.

Should I change the approach? Go to them first or wait for them to come to me? If they don't want to I remove them as an option?

There's something wrong with those chicks I talked about, all those dudes that went to them, those girls didn't offer anything, they just left the house, got a free ride, maybe even flaked on 9 out of 10 guys and those 9 guys just wasted their time.

That's why I'm so against driving to them or picking them up for a first few times. Is my thinking correct?