There is no cliché worse than the heels myth. I mean how often do you see your girl in heels fellas? Once a year, maybe twice? Understandably a huge deal breaker I get it.

If you're sleeping with men on the first date, you are no longer the gatekeeper of sex; you're just a hoe hanging out at the open gates.

LMAO

I commented in there while it was new, basically said "the good men are right in front of you" and just pointed out the usual dynamic that if you're going for the most attractive men, you'll get used

I just went back in there (it's been locked but I can still see it in my comment history) and tried to give some random dude a silver award, but I've been banned! screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/6FkcPWG

Once again, if you're visiting here from my crosspost to that bastion of misandrist censorship known as "reddit" (ptui!), take some time to explore and create an account.

Learning a new platform can seem daunting, but both sides of this site (trp.red and forums.red) are really easy to use.

oh yeah, and CENSORSHIP-FREE!

Note how she can't actually deny what he said so she keeps trying to rephrase it so that she doesn't look like a shallow idiot.

If you don't mind sleeping with a man on the first date, you are going to have no mechanism for determining if a man is truly "into you" or if he just wants a one night stand. If your timeframe for the how quick you sleep with someone is the same for a long term relationship as it is for a one night stand, what incentive is a man going to have to even engage in a long term relationship? A man who wants a long term relationship is less likely to want a woman he knows is easy, so she is setting herself up for failure by choosing to act like she is in a hookup instead of a relationship. Not that she can really turn it around and proclaim she is "high value" by choosing to delay sex when she would be doing nothing more than setting an arbitrary window of time to wait for sex. Being worth the wait means that there must be an incentive to wait, and extending this period to the type of man you ask the most from is just showing that you are just trying to game the system rather than be a good woman.

That guy is spot on about the initial filter being her downfall. She selects for what makes her tingle first and then hopes it will guide her to a man who is also good. But if she neglects to look for good character, she is mostly going to get the type of guy who will say and do as much as he needs to in order to get a quick lay and vanish. And based on her "preferences", the tall and attractive type of guy she is filtering for is going to have more options. Yes, the Apex fallacy at work, where she wonders why every guy she is interested in only wants hookups and sleeping around. Well, if she actually looked beyond physical features she might find a guy who wants more than that.

Also, her "it goes both ways" for looks may seem reasonable, but just remember how men rank women's attractiveness versus how women rank men's attractiveness. Men have a far broader range of whom they find attractive than women, so when a man selects for attractiveness he provides far more chances than what women will. So it really is not the same thing.

Lol that this broad cant wear sneakers, ever.

Its great that she has her own career, versus the ones that live on child support and welfare. She has no kids yet. Not a total waste.

If only her standards weren't so unrealistic. I've never met a man who's height was respective to how good of a man he was. Maybe if she stops screwing strangers and running up miles on herself, she could actually try to make a connection with a guy?

Imagine only dating supermodels and prostitutes because they meet your physical attractiveness requirements. Why do I keep getting ghosted? It's like they're shopping because they have so many options. Where are all the good women? Wahhhh

Notice that she's looking into her future telescope and sees Rollo's Epiphany Phase right there on the horizon?

It's like magic. She's justifying her hoe actions and realizing that she doesn't have much "party time" left, so why not fuck everyone she meets on the first date if she can rationalize it as filtering for a husband.

Her next post to come: "Why did he future-fake me???"

"I don't care if you're 6' tall, you just have to be close enough to 6' that most women can't tell the difference. And my obvious double standard is totally okay because false equivalency."

She's so close to waking up, yet obviously fighting tooth and nail to remain asleep.

Idiot: "I don't understand why I can't find a job!! Is there no one hiring!!"

Wise Person: "There are lots of job but they're not going to pay you $300k per year - you're just not worth that much."

Idiot: "Pay is very important. I wont apologize for having high pay standards!"