Normally, we aren't that interested in a man's response. Our focus is mostly on women suffering the consequences of the dual mating strategy and their own bad decisions. However, this one is exceptional. It's almost like his testimony is part of our sidebar (see: Michael's Story), but he uses no Red Pill or MGTOW lingo/jargon. It's as though men are coming to these realizations and conclusions on their own.

Another reason I don't think this guy is Red Pilled and trying to sow Red Pill seeds among the masses, is that he refers to his legitimate concerns as "insecurity" on more than one occasion. Dismissing a man's concerns and instincts as "insecurity" is a very gynocentric, Feminine-Imperative-serving move. He's still very much in the matrix.

Many people out there, especially on a certain subreddit that WAATGM was originally created in response to, would accuse him of being a NiceGuy™ and thinking he's "entitled" to sex. Like most men who get accused of this, he expresses no such entitlement, but rather confusion and frustration at not getting the results he was promised for the actions he preformed. It's sort of like if someone followed a recipe for chocolate chip cookies and his results were a liver milkshakes. Any reasonable person would be saying "wtf? Where did I go wrong? This isn't what was supposed to happen!" Yet the people who would deride this dude as a NiceGuy™ would also yell at our hypothetical cookie maker "you're not entitled to chocolate chip cookies!" Hopefully the man in the screenshot will find the correct recipe for whatever brings him happiness.

In high school, a girl once told me I’d “make great husband material after everyone has had their fun and wants to settle down”. I’ve heard a few variations of this since, and it always makes me think is “what’s wrong with me now”? [emphasis added]

I, too, received the line about being "husband material" and not "boyfriend material" a few times. The one that finally got me to wake up and adapt was a friend of mine (who was also a girlfriend to another friend of mine) who not only told me that, but tried to make it sound like I would win in the end, after the women all "had their fun". My response back then, many years before the Red Pill was anything other than a prop in "The Matrix", was the same as it is now: sloppy 170ths isn't "winning". For all that women's advice to men is usually terrible, and I didn't take hers the way she intended, it was very helpful.

This dude seems like he isn't willing to adapt, and I can't really blame him. I adapted because for all that I was disappointed that no girls/women I had found up to that point had saved themselves for marriage, I still thought learning to play the game properly would benefit me. Now that the internet and social media have laid bare female nature, and young women are even less reserved than back then, many men such as the one in the screenshot are deciding that they just aren't worth bothering with.

I'm just gonna do a quick re-write and try to mix in a little bit of a twist, I'll assume you've read the original. I'm not demanding that you accept Krishna as your lord and savior, but if you are an atheist, this will only hurt your brain. If you want to debate religion and the existence of God, be my guest but before you do, I'll ask you, "Do you prefer ass or titts?" Think of your answer, wrong! You've been warned.

Being the security relationship or the "comforter" is great if you are doing it to gain favor with the Lord (other people are not the lord) until you realize how people are people and people act like people, i.e, they do the bare minimum to get what they want and only give begrudgingly. You start to understand that you are not valuable to other people, only what you can provide is valuable to other people. "Valuable" and "valuable to others" are not the same thing, especially when it comes to your own actions. For example, masturbation is valueless to you, but very valuable to the porn industry. "But, wait! I value masturbation because it makes me feel good." And this is why we can't have nice things or civil discourse, because everything is subjective and no one can be wrong so long as they "feel". You can't just say masturbation is bad or cutting off your genitals is bad, you have to say, "Well, it depends on the intersection of-- Jesus Lord Christ!"

If you do what you do to get people to like you, then you are going to have a bad time (hell is other people), I know that your intentions are "good", but reality doesn't care. If the dog is a biter, it will bite, don't matter if your hand only wants to pet it. If you do what you because you do believe it is the right thing based on whatever higher ideal you believe in, then you have truly won. Higher ideals differ from feelz in that you do exactly what you preach, instead of what you feel in the moment. If you are a gym goer, then you know that your muscles grow if you workout regardless of what you feel about being at the gym. I hate the gym, but I still go because I want to be able to carry at least one person out of a burning building in case I ever need to. "So, what you don't get an ego-boost from having big muscles?" I do and it does feel good to have muscles. Could you please stop interpreting everything I write as a claim to being some sort of unbermench superhuman?

Two paragraphs are dedicated to demonstrate that this man is acting in accordance with the code of chivalry. I've had my share of travel, pre-covid, and I can attest that what he describes is the basic decent member of society, any society and any religion and even any skin color, has this as the standard for a decent civilized human being. Decent as in will not try to fuck your wife while you are at work even if she comes on to me. Civilized as in will not shit on the sofa but will hold it till I find a bathroom. Human being is more difficult to explain, but basically will not kill you if you disagree on some point or an other.

In high school, a girl once told him he'd "make great husband material after everyone had their fun and wants to settle." And to be honest, I agree. If he is what he describes himself to be, he would make a wonderful husband. The key word here is "would", which does not equate to "will". This makes this man ask, "What's wrong with me now? What is my worth? Will I be loved for who I am? Or will someone come along and see the life I've built and think, 'he'll do?'"

Yes. This is exactly what will happen. Someone will come along and say, "You'll do." And you will have the option to "will" or "willn't". Who has the power now? You has the power now. See? Buddha does love you after all. You get the suffering first, then you get the reward. And not only do you get the reward, Allah is so generous that he won't force you to accept the reward, you can simply forgo the reward here and now, and add it to your credit for the time you meet Jesus. Freewill at it's theoretical best.

No human is going to love you for "you", because most of us are so solipsistic, that we don't even know ourselves, let alone know others in order to actually love them. If you want love, turn inwards, find your inner light and feel the love. We men were created to give love, not receive it (my own subjective belief, wanna debate ass vs titts again?). We get our love from Jahwe and pass it on the lesser beings in order to make their existence slightly less miserable. Unless you're a feminist single mother with hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt pursuing a degree to focus on your future career in Underwater basket weaving. Talk about being like being totally soooooofa king haaappy all the time to the nth degree to infinity and beyond! Have you ever read any social media post where people are sooooofa king haaaaappy while struggling and being miserable all the time but being too good for life itself? Marrying a single mom would be the ultimate win for any man, but only if she is her ultimate true self at at least 90+ kg (180+ pounds).

Fear has multiplied. The girls many of us meet come from horrific family situations with no real support system and so many of us become the friend, parent, therapist, personal bank, tampon, carrier of heavy things, the girlfriend without the girly stuff etc... I've personally been there and I've ended things right before the sex was about to happen. I read studies that sex is not good when there is no intention of life long family and I stopped having it with friends, one night stands, dates and the like. Call me old fashioned, but remember that I'm convinced that I have a soul and that my soul will have to pay the price (ass or titts?). I'm not willing to do the time, so I won't commit the crime. Yes, I did have my whore days where I whored myself for any woman that would let me smash. I'm not nowhere near Roosh numbers, but I ain't no male virgin Mary either. I've had my humble share. Please, lets start a never ending debate on the exact number of "enough" (titts or ass?) and head into the rabbit whole of "everything is subjective".

"I want authentic love." Who doesn't? But, before you wish for what you wish for, try to define that which you are wishing for. Let's say that you actually found a woman that actually loves you "authentically," the way you define authentic where you say to yourself, "This is the one". Would you still see it as authentic if on your wedding night you found out she used to be a man? Get over yourself and I mean this in the exact opposite way of trying to be offensive. If more of us men got over ourselves, things would be better for all of us. We man carry the burden of logic and reason. Logic and reason are tools of the patriarchy because they can't be short-circuited with emotions without horrific results. "I should sow the field, but I feel that if I could just not sow the fields and have fun right now, then god will sow the fields for me. I mean what is god if not a glorified personal nanny? I'm not going to do anyhing and if god doesn't solve all my problems I'll be soooofa king unhaaaappy with him!"

Women are allowed to have delusions, men are not. This is not my opinion, this is what reality has taught me straight to the gut, face, balls, mind, legs, arms, ears, skin and soul over and over again. Give me around 400 years and I might actually learn that lesson for real, but don't hold your breath.

The response to the comment about being a good husband that day is "but by then you wouldn't make a good wife." We need to be straight up telling these thots that every dick they take makes them less suitable for marriage.

Most high school girls are morons. Only a teacher would be aware enough to know that, let alone be daring enough to tell a male student.

This man does not want to just be needed, he wants to be wanted. This is a valid concern considering marriage is no longer held sacred by much of society. A woman can easily divorce a man and get great benefits from doing so, meaning that she can still get the resources she needs without having to abide by her marriage vows. Maybe he is not thinking of that prospect in particular, but he understands what it means to be used, and he certainly does not want that.

That highlighted portion, wow. That is straight up insulting and disrespectful. It is the equivalent of telling a woman, "You're a great lay, but I would sure as hell never marry you." In both cases, you are telling someone that they are not worth the full package of what he or she really wants. Men do not want to wait for a woman to spend a decade slutting it up before they are considered "worthy" of her time. Some men may accept such a bad deal, but this is not what they want. This statement does not even grant the benefit of the doubt that the women who are riding the carousel are somehow unaware of the fact that they are making the man they claim will be the most important to them (because being a husband to a woman is supposed to make him the most important out of all other men) wait the longest and get the least return of reward for his investment. A woman's word that your love is somehow stronger because of the ceremony that was done means little when her previous actions show no proper preparation for what the ceremony is supposed to signify.

With men seeing the deal get worse like this man did, it is little wonder more and more men are checking out of the whole idea of ever getting married.