Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
- Main Forums
- What's Hot
- TRP.RED
- Tribe Forums
- TheRedPill
- Tribe Management
- Create New Tribe
- Manage My Tribes
- Find New Tribes
- Recent News
-
-
Pic889 2y ago
Sweety, men aren't vending machines where you put sex tokens in and commitment falls out.
CisgenderPig 2y ago
However, if you pull my crank enough, you can get cummitment from me for the evening.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2y ago
[Meta]If you're here from reddit, you really ought to create an account here and start participating here. The future at reddit is uncertain, and many communities have been banned without warning or explanation.[/meta]
Possible alternative/additional explanations to my title:
1) she's not as hot as she thinks.
2) she's a lousy lay.
3) she's so goddamn insufferable that it doesn't matter how hot or good in the sack she is, men decide they'd rather explore other options.
Here's what really sucks: even if she learns whatever lesson she needs to learn (and that's a mighty big "if") and changes her approach to relationships accordingly, she's highly likely to resent the men who are more "in her league" for not being the highly sought after Chads to whom she has become accustomed.
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 2y ago
Once she has tasted Chad, she will never be satisfied by Brad.
SeasonedRP 2y ago
I'm guessing she's insufferable.
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 2y ago
¿Por qué no los tres?
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2y ago
Ich verstehe nicht.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 2y ago
4) She's choosing men who won't commit to her.
If the man is much higher SMV than he, he's not going to commit to her instead of someone else.
A lot of women also subconsciously target low-commitment men as a way to justify their own commitment fears. In other words: by choosing a low commitment man she can avoid commitment AND BLAME SOMEONE ELSE FOR IT.
Normal will adjusted women have no problem finding men who will commit to them.
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 2y ago
Normal well adjusted women are increasingly abnormally hard to find.
OtPayOkerSmay 2y ago
Bingo. What better way to be able to play the "he cheated on me" pity card than going after a guy who is obviously not going to commit. It's almost strategic, because then they can play this card and blue pilled guys fall for it and give them undeserved sympathy. I'm done believing the "I was cheated on" lie, unless it's coming from a blue-pilled bro - at which point I'll point them to the red pill.
Profitglutton Jr. Hamster Analyst 2y ago
This is what I’m going with. My guess is she’s dating above her league and expecting commitment after handing out the goods already. That’s not how to prove you have value. All it shows is that they’re an easy lay and then it’s on to then it’s on to the next one.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 2y ago
Let's be honest here. If she is not attractive, putting out early is her only play. The problem is that this hypergamous whore would rather get pumped and dumped than be with someone who would actually consider her a prize. By the time she gets to that mental point, she'll unload all her mental turmoil on that guy as abuse and makes his life hell.
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 2y ago
Yup. The old canard about men being "afraid of commitment?" It may have been more true several decades ago, and there are certainly men today who aren't particularly interested in settling down. Generally speaking, however, it's pure projection. In my lifetime, and especially in the past 15-20 years, I've always found it's women don't want to commit because they're having too much fun riding the CC.
Even today I believe most decent, average dudes would be happy to settle down with a decent woman to build a life and family together. The problem is they can't find any who are A) actually willing to and B) not a used up turboslut.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2y ago
To further extend the analogy:
Part of the problem there is how also many women don't want to be there for the building process and sweat and effort and getting their hands dirty. They want to just show up and move into the fully built condo in the freshly gentrified neighborhood, and not pay any rent, deposit, or go through a credit check either. And they're shocked and appalled when the owner of that condo looks at them like they've lost their damn minds and doesn't let them stay the night.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 2y ago
Exactly. If you waited at the finish line, no one would even want to finish in you.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 2y ago
This is what happens when women overestimate their worth and shoot above their league. As a woman, if you want to be in a happy relationship, all you have to do is to find a guy who is less attractive than you are and to be devoted to him. But, these bitches don't want to give. They want to take. They want to gain validation, social status and recognition through their association with Chad. Too bad you are not attractive enough to lock down guys way above your league. That fuckzone hurts, huh?
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 2y ago
The guy doesn't even have to be less attractive - being around the same level would be enough. But since the same level is somehow below her, she only considers the cream of the crop.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 2y ago
Yes, it is enough if she is devoted enough.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 2y ago
And there's her problem: she's screening for men with Chad-level physical attractiveness. In other words: the same small subset of men that every other woman is chasing. She's extrapolating the conduct of those men onto all men, which means that she's fallen for the Apex Fallacy. If she made the same level of effort toward guys who are in her RMV league she would probably be much more successful.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 2y ago
We both know she won't.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 2y ago
And this is why you don't date women over age 28. She already has a body count of 10+ and they all nexted her.
DextroShade 2y ago
I think you're missing a zero on the body count.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 2y ago
10.... hahahaha
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 2y ago
Yeah that gives a 29% chance of a successful marriage with her. It's funny how in the West 10 doesn't seem like a lot, but most prostitutes have a n-count of 100 so that should kinda tell you where Western women are at these days.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 2y ago
29% of STAYING TOGETHER........ but most of the "successful marriages" are sexless and awful for the man.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 2y ago
haha after getting to the end of this whining, she finishes with "I offer a lot". Sure you do honey, sure you do...... I've also got a 12" cock and a billion in the bank.
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 2y ago
Doesn't mention what she offers, like at all.
cheesypongas2pointoh 2y ago
I was going to mention this, the “I offer a lot” ending was hilarious as fuck. This post is the kind of shit that makes me feel glad about putting my mission first and girls seventh because at 28 I want to have fitter options than WhereAreAllTheGoodMen hags
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 2y ago
Just what kind of men is she selecting? Having the same thing happen 10 different times tells me that something is going wrong with her selection criteria. If she is indeed selecting men who are in the top 10 percentage of attractiveness, those are the type of men with options. Having options does not guarantee you will make use of those options, but it means you are more likely to not settle on just one option.
It is not a problem to be selective based on physical attractiveness, but it is a problem to be selective only in that regard. If this has indeed happened 10 times to her, I would bet that she is not putting in the proper effort to look for traits such as morals and principles, as those sorts of things cannot be faked for the long term. Also, this is why I advocate against many of the practices of hookup culture, such as sleeping early on in a relationship (e.g. "3 date rule"). If a woman does not sleep with a man so early, then she is far less likely to run into a situation where she is used for sex. You cannot be used for sex very easily if you practice restraint with sex. And if a woman would state that without sleeping with a man early, she would not be able to keep him around, I would argue that she does not have much else going for her other than sex. And besides, this woman appears to be sleeping with men early, and they still leave.
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 2y ago
Unless she is a young virgin, telling a man to wait is either a shit-test for a possible Chad or trying to falsely claim she is a good girl to a Brad, depending on if she sees him as relationship material or just a foodie call.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2y ago
That three date rule is an adaptation to how women behave. If I had found a virgin back when I was dating, I'd have gladly waited.
I found no virgins, so I refused to wait. If she wants me, she'll put out.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2y ago
I'm chuckling in that back when I came of age in the 1980's, having sex after three dates wasn't really that much different than "hooking up". It meant that the man had to wine-and-dine her a bit, but this "investment" on his part didn't imply "morals and principles" because it was just the cost of getting laid. On the contrary, if he already "invested" in 2 dates and found he didn't like her much, he might be inclined to pay for a third if only to "get something" out of it.
Men who pay for multiple dates past that, even months of them, risk being "friendzoned" or exploited for foodie calls where even if she might have liked him otherwise, it's not a lack of "morals" on his part so much as her unconsciously finding him an unattractive beta.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 2y ago
Wining & dining, courtship are fine if the woman is a virgin. If the sex genie has been unleashed even a little bit, then I would not want to wait a second longer than any of the other guys she fucked. Either she puts out or she gets passed on. Welcome to the world you created ladies.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2y ago
It's my contention that a virtuous, virgin woman shouldn't be going out unescorted on paid dates due to the risks of sexual impropriety or quid-pro-quo. That was precisely the situation in Gone with the Wind where Rhett Butler was ostracized from polite society simply for being out with a woman where something COULD have happened.
In the off-chance she's a virgin, deflowering her after paying for dates seems to be sort of a bizarre virgin sexual sell-off scheme. In any case, plenty of women do refuse to have sex with (non-chad) men until the 3rd date rule, but that's the cost of doing "business". I accepted this condition in that women have the "right" to charge chad less than for us normie men just as, well, I didn't take ugly women out on paid dinner dates.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 2y ago
If she is a virgin, she will not go for a dinner date in the first place until she is sure that she wants to be in that spot. She will try to have a public setting, especially as part of a group. Which brings me to desire: it does not matter if a woman is a virgin or a whore, if she desires someone enough, she will make herself available. Virgins in traditional marriages will rush to get married. Whores will rush to fuck as soon as they can.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2y ago
Keep in mind that women don't think like us men do such as considering consequences, responsibility, and such. That's what the man is for. She just does what "feels good" which is how "desire" plays into it.
I must confess that a free lunch tastes delicious. I go to vendor events for work and I saw all three star wars films for free that included warm snacks and treats brought to us during the screening just for watching a sales presentation. It was sweet! Going out to a place, being "served", and munching while someone tries to please you is a super high, particularly for those who are young and haven't experienced it before. Now that I've gone out to restaurants for decades, I'm blasé about them.
But for young women, who are told by their friends that they MUST go out for free stuff with men, they don't think beyond getting dressed and looking pretty and going through the menu for free goodies. When date 3 comes around, it's like a high pressure sales presentation: Sign for the car or let the "deal" go to someone else?
"Whores" by definition don't rush to fuck. That's a slut. It's interesting that women's virtue signal in modern society to avoid being called a slut (something they blame on us men, even as it's largely other women that shame them) by being whores "It's ok sisters! I got free meals!"
So the game for men is to escalate at all times. 1st date, a kiss and light touching. 2nd date, sitting intimately together. Third date, and so on. It's tragic that our "traditional" dating culture is based upon caveman prostitution but it is what it is.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 2y ago
Technically, we are talking about a slut. But being called a slut is no longer shameful. There has been a massive movement to whitewash the term slut ( slut walks, propaganda against slut shaming etc), which is why the term whore was used here.
Additionally, a slut fucks out of desire. She is a slut to Chad. A whore fucks transactionally. She is a whore to beta bucks when she demands to be wined and dined.
Personally, I don't mind sluts if they admit to being one. I do not like whores who pretend to be virtuous angels. I have no issue with professional prostitutes if they are open about what they do.
You do not necessarily have to escalate at all times with sluts since desire will show in other ways. She might be hesitant to kiss you in public, but she will fuck you if you take her private. When I was cold approaching for fun, I would not chase girls. One of my favorite things to do is to make a girl qualify (to me) to be worthy of a conversation by entirely dismissing her beauty. If she was saying some boring shit, I would momentarily turn away to look at something else or if it was in a group, to say something to someone else. She would change the topic herself soon. I don't subscribe to pressing girls to have sex immediately. I don't like to wine and dine them either. I like to make them qualify and submit to me. Yes, you will not be dealing in quantity with this approach, but, in the long run, it works out better.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2y ago
What you describe reminds me of FDS and how they (wish) it worked: By setting standards, or "qualifying", you signal your value to women which is what they desire in, and of, itself. Certainly strong, powerful men are attractive to women because women mostly define sexual gratification by social validation or on the other end, risk taking ("bad boys").
I think you do follow the escalation rule, to a certain degree, by knowing to set your qualification tests higher as the woman becomes more emotionally vested. Turning away if she bores you within a minute of talking probably results in her walking off moreso than a half hour in.
I think women's "slut walks" are directed towards chads, and not the women that actually are what stresses them out. If she sleeps with a hundred chads, there's beta guys that have no problems with that but it doesn't matter. And since women are hosting the slut walks, they do little good since women will slut shame them if they sleep with a beta who doesn't pay for her.
It's funny that it's mostly women that shame whores even as most women view NOT being a whore as default being a slut. So they get VERY uncomfortable when I point out that their most cherished tradition, the dinner date, is merely a form of caveman prostitution, "the oldest profession". Food was the first currency used in a financial transaction to procure sex. To avoid this shame, the women demand men put on a form of mating ritual to pretend he's having a good time on the date (therefore, he doesn't mind paying) and that he's a "gentleman". This isn't shaming such men, but rather the opposite: They're sadly brainwashed.
We're living in a 21st century dystopia predicted by 19th and early 20th century authors as to the question of whether "free love" could ever work out. Would women, free of need to be provided and protected by individual men, be able to choose men for truly romantic reasons based upon "soul" and intellectual merit and caring? We now have the answer.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 2y ago
FDS's strategy does work. It works on beta guys who would be willing to submit to these women. FDS women are just shrewd enough to call these guys as HVM.
Yes, I screen for desire and submission. Not for readiness to fuck.
You would be surprised at what results you get when you don't give a fuck and utilize body language as your means of communication.
Slut walks are to make it acceptable for beta men so that they get used to the idea of marrying a slut.
Some do. But not many. Once you have had it easy, you don't want to make it difficult.
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 2y ago
Obviously not, or one of these men would have locked you down by now.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2y ago
Why, her very presence is "a lot". What are you, some kind of MiSoGyNiSt?!
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 2y ago
Sir, I'll have you know my knees are positively sodden.