Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
- Main Forums
- What's Hot
- TRP.RED
- Tribe Forums
- TheRedPill
- Tribe Management
- Create New Tribe
- Manage My Tribes
- Find New Tribes
- Recent News
-
-
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 2y ago
Welp, here we have the best woman there is and has ever been. A better woman shall never be born, and yet even she has trouble finding a mate. How dare men chose other woman over our 31 years old heroine? Who cares about youth, companionship and amenability when you can have a woman that has heard from everyone around her how amazing she is?
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 2y ago
She's probably one of those ugly light-skinned Indian chicks who gets told she's beautiful because of her light skin. If you go look at Bollywood and beauty pageants it's all based on skin tone. If you go a few shades darker there are perfect 10s that are considered ugly. My ugly ass could probably get a starring movie role because I'm white.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 2y ago
Yeah, like a huge amount of Bollywood actors and actresses are from the Punjab. Don’t get me wrong, Punjabi women frequently look great, but India has a lot of women who are beautiful in all different skin tones. But there is unquestionably a bias towards light skin.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 2y ago
Old but gold infographic on what OP refuses to understand or does understand but won't admit she knows:
https://thepowermoves.com/wp-content/uploads/dating-options-for-successful-women-and-men-1.jpg
Also, I would love to know what this broad looks like to further analyze why Alphabux does not want the "great catch" OP is
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2y ago
Yeah one of the things our society low key refuses to openly admit is that as a general rule women are both shallow and materialistic as fuck. And the denial of that is so strong that women will unconsciously ruin their chances of being anything other than a fucktoy for apex tier men.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 2y ago
For some apex men. The higher up you go, the more she will be avoided because of the trouble she might bring. You don't get to the top without knowing what risks to take and what to avoid.
AurelianWay Jr. Hamster Analyst 2y ago
When a woman is ambiguous about how a three year relationship ended it usually means that she was dumped. She also speaks favourably about her ex at the end of her original post. I have no way to verify but either she got dumped or she dumped the ex and is now regretting this decision as the dating market isn't as favourable as her highness thought it would be.
Initial-Glove Wahmyns 2y ago
I was thinking she monkey branched and it didnt pan.
Either way, that was her best shot at anything real and its gone.
FreeDinnerStrategy 2y ago
Equally, it means she did some whore shit like meet someone higher value than her man and fell for the new guy. This makes her look bad so it’s in her best interest to be ambiguous about the circumstances of her failed relationship.
AurelianWay Jr. Hamster Analyst 2y ago
Agreed. The ambiguity speaks volumes itself. If she was the one who cheated or fucked things up then her credibility will be shot and she will look bad when trying to get sympathy for why she can't find a good man.
reignoferror00 2y ago
"I get that but those guys will probably still be single in years to come as they'll never be happy with who they have no matter how pretty, kind, successful the woman is. I guess by your logic these men will be snapped up.
Them not picking me is doesn't mean it is a me problem - perhaps they also need to look at themselves."
You get that? Obviously not. I'll translate your particular dialect of womanese "I got that" means I'm completely dismissing and trying to completely forget what you wrote. It is possible that it does makes sense but taking what you said into account makes me uncomfortable. There is the possibility I may have to change my mind/opinion/script talking points if I take it into account. We can't have that. No can do.
If you really "got that" your replies following would have taken that into account. The irony is delicious. Try flipping what you said and direct it to yourself - because you are the one who really needs to look at yourself. If who you want doesn't want to pick you whose problem is it other than yours?
Initial-Glove Wahmyns 2y ago
But the top tier guys will have earned the right to not be happy with the prettiest, youngest, etc lol.
They dont get snapped up. They do the snapping.
And frankly, she's 10 years past that.
31 is the perfect time to take a real good look around at what's available for her. The next best time was yesterday.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2y ago
Note how she starts trickling truthing a little bit right at the end about how she may not be matching male preferences....
But still tries to blame men.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 2y ago
This guy is a saint for trying to gently describe to her what is happening. She might be a 7, which means that a man who is a 7 is her perfect match. But she doesn’t want a 7. She doesn’t want a guy making $80k a year as a lineman who is 5’10”. She wants the 9+. Attractive and equal or greater professional value.
Her experience is clearly telling her that the guys she’s casting aside are her true level. If she’s a 7 and wants a 9, guess what? There’s other 7’s who want that 9. If there’s 4 women for every 1 man, prepare to share that man with 3 other women. Simple.
You want a committed relationship? Date a 7. A dude who is a 7 is a solid guy.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2y ago
The sad part is for the lower 80% of women, this kind of man is an exceptional catch, far more than most of them will ever deserve. Assuming he lives well outside the overcrowded areas with a cost of living so inflated they are turning into shitholes surrounding the gated enclaves of the super wealthy, he's making income sufficient to support a family easily in a middle class lifestyle. And if he's done any sort of wise investing, if he's in his 30's he may already be well on his way to early retirement.
But most of these bitches are too stupid to see that and are wasting their only currency (their 20's) trying to chase caviar Kardashian dreams.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 2y ago
Yeah but remember, he works with his hands! Icky. And he lives in rural or exurban areas? He probably voted for Donald trump!
Nothing but the best for these ladies.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 2y ago
A woman who is a 7 can either get a 9 who is poorer than her or a below 7 who is richer than her. She can't get a 9 who is richer than her. The sooner she realizes it, the sooner she has a chance to be happy. That goes for most women.
SpiritualEnema Jr. Hamster Analyst 2y ago
Women’s finances and income aren’t that important to most men, at least not until we get older. I’d rather have better raw material without all the bullshit that comes with her income level and inherent expectations.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 2y ago
I should have clarified it as poverty-stricken or a freeloader or a sugar momma type thing. As Patrice Oneal put it, Halle berry's pussy is the same as the bitch that works at McDonald's pussy.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2y ago
His only mistake was not informing her that she's literally getting older day by day. A poster here said something brilliant: Describe it to women like this: "Imagine if a guy got 1/2" shorter each year." All the traits she describes: her intelligence, sense of humor, etc. mean NOTHING to her when a man possesses them but he's short and poor. Her age is basically shortness and poverty.
Each of these women should be informed of this reality; Whatever unpleasantness there is to "settling", each day that goes by they get to settle for less. If she had "settled" back in her early 20's, she'd have a family and kids and a nice house with a richer guy. She didn't and she has to pay just as she'd expect men to pay if they were unattractive but wealthy. She made a bad decision. Welcome to equality and being responsible for your choices.
I'd also add that her attitude by itself is unattractive: Hypergamous people, whether in romance or friendship, where they only want to be friends with someone "cooler" than they are, translate into the cool people realizing that the person who wants to be their friends is shallow and only cares about them because they're "cool" is a turn-off.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 2y ago
Yes. I remember watching Poor Man’s Podcast and his take on stuff like this is, and I paraphrase, “people know why you’re there. They just don’t want constant reminders of it”. Like the man who makes $500k a year knows why suddenly 9’s and 10’s want him, but it’s fine as long as they’re having fun around him, showing him care, and all of that. But it’s unattractive if the expectation is a weekend getaway to somewhere nice 3 times a month.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 2y ago
And fwiw, it’s pure solipsism. Women like men who are intelligent and funny. Guess what intelligence and sense of humor correlate to? Being rich! A smart man triggers that reptilian instinct in a woman that he’s probably someone who can provide resources. That’s why marital rates skyrocket for men as they increase in intellect, but it doesn’t really matter for women.
So beyond the 1/2” loss analogy that you mention, she’s also missing the point completely by not asking herself what these men want. Like you know as a man that you aren’t competitive for the 9’s and 10’s of women if you’re 5’7” or showing up on the first date in a 1998 Honda Accord. Because that’s not what they want. They want dominant and strong men. Same thing for her: she may be pretty, but she’s 31. Why would the top guys want pretty and 31 when they can have beautiful and 21? And because women are much more age conscious than men, they can’t understand why a 33 year old man would want to be with a 21 year old woman.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2y ago
Another way of looking at it is The Golden Rule is broken: Others don't necessarily want what you want. Sure, sometimes that applies but oftentimes, just because I may like Polish folk music may not mean all my party guests will be into it. Solipsistic people may genuinely believe they are being considerate when they think that their standards imposed upon other people are doing others a favor.
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 2y ago
That's not the Golden Rule being broken, that's people taking it too literally and missing the mark. The rule is about consideration as much as action. The point isn't to literally exhibit the behavior you'd like directed toward you, it's to stop and think about what the individual in question values and what they might appreciate then behaving appropriately. Not because you expect immediate reciprocation or material reward but because people behaving in such a way makes things better for everyone.
/petpeeverant
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2y ago
I appreciate the distinction, but "too literally" is the point: It's something that sounds nice but when taken at face value, people can and do abuse it intentionally or unintentionally.
Consider the term "feminism" which is defined as "equality between the sexes" which is equated to "equality FOR women" which ultimately defines equality in terms of what women want (abortion, free daycare/healthcare, etc.) It's an interesting semantic distinction which is in plain sight of everyone but rarely questioned.