Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
Loneliness-inc
Posted 1y ago in Complaining about jerks - Permalink - Locked - 15.7K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 1y ago Stickied
All of these men are well aware this woman is not one that values chastity, so they operate with this understanding. We can confirm that sex is most certainly not something very restrictive for her, as evidenced by her own story with failed attempts with relationship as well as the Friend with Benefits (especially the latter). This means she does not have the bargaining chip of sex being considered special in her court, so many men are going to see a commitment to such a woman as far too costly when they consider the cost of sex to be cheap with her. A woman who places no value in sexual restraint is more likely to cheat or initiate divorce since her past demonstrates the ease at which she goes from man to man. Even if they are not successful at getting said sex, they see the investment as not worth it.
I suspect that this woman is like many others who have relied far too heavily on her own sexuality to get ahead in the sexual marketplace. The problem that comes from this is that it only gets these women as far as sex can take them, and most often that is not far enough to get a committed relationship. Even worse, many of these women have nothing else to rely on to keep the interest of men, which is key to making a relationship work. Sex alone cannot maintain a relationship, as it is doomed to fail the moment that it no longer has the luster to keep a man interested.
Feminism can tell women all it wants that women can do as they please, but there is a price to be paid for being too promiscuous. That price is having men who are only interested in sex while the men interested in a lasting relationship staying far away from such women.
Lionsmane8 1y ago
The sad reality is that if you don't dump her, she'll think there is something wrong with you
kevin32 Ambassador for NiceGuys™ 1y ago
@moorekom, I'd like to sidebar this statement as it perfectly summarizes why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit. The post is still fresh so I plan to repost it down the line for more visibility.
@Typo-MAGAshiv, @goodmansaysfuckyou
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 1y ago
Go right on ahead with that. Let me know if I can make any edits, as I do not write what I do each time with the idea that it will be marked for sidebar material.
kevin32 Ambassador for NiceGuys™ 1y ago
Thank you, no edits needed, it's very good as is.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
Kevin, yes please.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
Hell yeah.
If memory serves, didn't you say the sidebar was out of space a few months back? It might be time to revamp it a bit.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
I believe it was in old.reddit. I don't think that was an issue in new.reddit or here.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
Ah, you might be right.
Too bad that old reddit is far superior to the cancer known as new reddit.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
I see your point in the first paragraph, but it's worth noting, for women's sakes, that seeming sexual chaste while making demands of men is still using sex as a bartering tool. This seems to mirror her claimed experiences perfectly in that even when she doesn't put out for some of the men, they move on rather than being beta-pilled into committing to her. Withholding sex like dog treats for men largely only works with hungry men that women aren't interested in the first place. A few decades ago, this was ideal for women because hungry men were acceptable as reliable beta male providers.
If this woman was my friend or relative, I'd sincerely advise her to consider utilizing non-sexual, feminine virtues with men including cooking meals, wholesome activities, engaging conversation, and so forth.
Consider: If this woman was nice to be around, not just for sex, many men might stick around at least to be a beta orbiter. The fact that she says she's getting ghosted or dropped off indicates she's insufferable to be around.
Loneliness-inc LvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 1y ago
It really isn't so. The comment by @houseoftolstoy was correct.
Virginity was something that men valued in women since time immemorial.
Because men trade resources for sex and women trade sex for resources. Therefore, a woman's sexual purity is highly important to men who have resources. Ergo, virginity was valued.
Let's elaborate on what virginity is and isn't and we'll understand where your mistake stems from.
The value of virginity is that of sexual exclusivity. Meaning, that her sexuality is devoted - 100% - to her husband. This isn't about withholding sex per se, it's about giving it entirely to her husband. This includes withholding from everyone else, but it's not about withholding from her husband.
This has been the standard expectation in marriage, throughout history. Sexual exclusivity was standard. Virgins were higher value than widows who were higher value than divorcees who were higher value than sluts...
This is in tandem with male nature itself. It's only recently that some men drank some kool-aid that convinced them that virginity and her past doesn't matter (until it suddenly does...)
In short: virgins and non virgins are not playing the same game. Don't conflate the two.
Because she is not a virgin. She cannot demand virgin prices.
She certainly can't become a born again virgin.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
My observation "using sex as a bartering tool" is not incongruent with your claim "men trade resources for sex and women trade sex for resources"
Your claim that men value virginity is related to women withholding sex to appear chaste and therefore, either a virgin or a low body count as in she held out for a while versus if she goes to bed on the first date. In neither case is the woman a virgin but in modern terms, one is perceived as "less" chaste than the other.
The woman didn't declare herself a virgin and few women do. Besides, few women over age 22 are virgins nowadays hence most men are going to have accept as such. This ties into my point that her sexual value, including any appearance of chastity and holding out, didn't overcome her lack of other assets.
Note that in the past, youth was as important as virginity but it was just a single asset including wealth provided by her family as well as an industrious nature. Was she someone who worked hard in the home? Back a little over a century ago, most women did work in the home (because of modern "labor saving" home appliances) but also out in the fields and the factories. In fact, it wasn't uncommon for men to find older women with "huge tracts of land" desirable apart from their lack of virginity. George Washington, after all, married a widow. I googled it and found this:
"Martha and George Washington Were Married on January 6, 1759. As a young, attractive, wealthy widow, Martha Dandridge Custis probably enjoyed more freedom to choose her own destiny than at any other point in her life."
In any case, as everyone here well knows, women have "beta bucks/alpha fucks" rules where they may appear "chaste" and even "born again virgin" to demand betas wait for the wedding night. I propose to you, why CAN'T she become a "born again virgin?" It's not like women have CARFAXes to tell us their sexual history.
No-Stress-Cat 1y ago
I know the answer to this one! Because you can unscrew a lightbulb, but you can't unscrew a virgin.
My first wife claimed to be a virgin. I knew she was full of shit. She would say shit like:
"I broke my hymen while horseriding." Yeah, right, bitch. You have the fucking saddle horn up your cooch?
"Wow, you're very thick." As compared to fucking what?
"Did you know, that if a woman doesn't have sex for 7 years, she's considered a "Born Again Virgin"?" What, so you got a train ran on you 7 years ago?
Women always tell on themselves. Even about their own sexual history.
Loneliness-inc LvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 1y ago
Nice!
Yes, they do.
I did marry a virgin and I can tell you that they absolutely act differently. You don't have to be an expert to see it. You just need to pay attention, just a little bit.
Profitglutton Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Did you ever call her out on her lies?
No-Stress-Cat 1y ago
Nah. I just burst out laughing.
Loneliness-inc LvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 1y ago
Sex and resources are always what's being traded between men and women. Always!
The difference between "trade" and "bargaining chip" is a difference of class. Similar to the difference between a wife and a whore.
A wife is trading sex for resources, but she does not wield it over his head as a bargaining chip. She freely and readily gives sexual access to her man.
A whore uses sex as a bargaining chip. Each sexual encounter must be earned individually.
I addressed this point in the previous comment.
In a world with actual patriarchy, a woman must give her sexual self, 100% to her husband. Marriage entails 2 parts: to forsake all others and to have sex with her husband.
This is what it means to be sexually exclusive. This isn't the same thing as being chaste or prude.
But she demands virgin pricing.
Lionsmane8 1y ago
Sex for resources is the beta side of hypergamy.
Sex for sex is the alpha side.
The issue is that women don't want to "settle" for the beta side until they have no choice but to (or die alone).
She is mad that the men her instincts tells her to lay with can't be bamboozled into playing the provider role through wielding the sex carrot.
As for the men that can be manipulated through sex? Eeww, women got rights and jobs precisely so they don't have to pretend to like those guys for financial security.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
As I stated above, there are cases where men historically have been able to marry for money. Courtship, with the word being "court"ly behavior, knights woo'ed the wealthy daughters of aristocrats and nobles for access to wealth from those families. It's hilarious that what we now regard as "traditional" behavior of women golddiggers is based upon men who used to seduce women to get access to her family assets. Such courtship didn't involve trade between the man and woman, but their FAMILIES interests. A knight who was politically popular brought status to a wealthy family by marrying their daughter, for instance. Hence, my pseudonym.
I fail to see a moral distinction between renting a woman versus marriage 'ownership". In a true patriarchy, the man is head of the household, period, even if the woman earns more than him and this can happen such as if she works in a factory while he's a farmer and such. Our modern era of women engaging in sexual commerce, with some labeled as not prostitution, is due to so many people having engaged in transactional sex that society had to find a way to allow people to rationalize away their shame.
These distinctions can be difficult to explain, and why there's so much confusion, in that after a century or so of transactional sex being referred to as "romance" and arbitrary, socially convenient distinctions being made that it's tough to get the point across. I believe there are men and women who do have sincere "classical" romances based upon mutual moral values and wanting to raise a family together with resources and sex being regarded as secondary in that the man shouldn't be an unemployed loser and the woman shouldn't be a prude or CC rider. I know couples like that who met in high school. They are invisible in the dating market after teen years since by then, the golddiggers have gotten set in their ways so we assume that they're universal. We shouldn't base our relationship expectations upon unicorn ideals though.
Loneliness-inc LvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 1y ago
Marriage ownership - a long term investment of the man into the woman, in exchange for exclusive and unlimited sexual access and authority over his investment. Authority and responsibility are balanced. Thus, this is morally sound.
Renting a woman (in its many forms. From outright prostitution to modern dating in its many iterations) - a short term investment of the man into the woman, in exchange for limited sexual access, for a limited time. This too is morally sound from a purely business perspective (putting religion aside).
What is dishonest and thus, immoral - is when a pussy rental car is sold as a brand new car, demanding new car prices. This is trickery.
The car already has many miles put on it. Additionally, every punk spun this car in a way that maximized his own fun, resulting in the maximizing of the car's damage as well.
Rental cars are even worse than used cars. Because used cars were taken care of by their previous owners, whereas rental cars were abused by their renters.
Lionsmane8 1y ago
I smell a woman that tried withholding sex to gain compliance over men and it backfired. Now to save face, she rationalizes it as "men only want me for sex".
reignoferror00 1y ago
Her former FWB likely eventually did a cost/benefit analysis. Trying to be her 'friend' wasn't worth the 'benefit'. Her constant need for validation - aka attention whoring - either didn't come with a constant and consistent 'benefit' or he finally realized it wasn't worth it. Some guys will put up with this for a while; no one wants it as a full-time job without pay. Enough about me, what do you think of me? (and it better be all positive).
As far as all the other guys, here's the connection. Try to connect the dots. Talking with you frequently only makes them want to do it less. I'm sure your conversations aren't tedious and are frequently on subjects that actually interest them /s.
If you want someone who appears to value you as a person, just message/text back and forth with one of your girlfriends. You both can pretend to sympathize with each other while pumping each other up and shitting on any men who have had the misfortune to come into any extended contact with you.
You want to be treated as a 'human' or 'person'? Don't think you'd want to be treated as "one of the guys". Odds are you couldn't meet the personality threshold to be fully accepted and also your skin would be way too thin for the crude direct joking comments. On top of that you'd actually be expected to contribute once in a while; even something as simple as bringing the beer or buying a round would likely offend you.
Your edit/update doesn't improve your image. Looks like the one thing you may be good for you're not even following through with. Is it only Chad who gives you a wide on and gets to give your panty hamster a spin?
and/or are you implying you now want commitment before sex? If so, I want the name of your supplier because your dealer must be getting you some quality shit.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
That's because there's nothing else you offer that interests them.
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 1y ago
Most obvious conclusion ever, and yet she cannot see it.
Gee, who knows. Maybe they're all virgos, or whatever mumbo jumbo you use to excuse your behaviours. It surely can't be because you're a boring hoe - but still a hoe, so they stick around a bit longer.
Loneliness-inc LvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 1y ago
jUsT bEcUz i hAd A fWb, dOziNt mEaN iM jUsT a sEx oBjEcT.
Im sO mUcH mOrE tHaN sEx
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Yup and on top of that is probably the unacknowledged (by women and their toadies) issue most women also have of trying to lock down a man way too damn high up the ladder above them and he's got way too many options also slinging free pussy at him for him to give a shit about Pussy #432 on any sort of personal level other than making sure he's got her name right in the booty call phone.
Women get used by "fuckboys" because they choose that sort of man to dispense pussy treats to.
A woman that exercises better judgement in who to open her legs for and who to keep them closed for, oddly enough doesn't have the issue of getting used for pussy.
[deleted] 1y ago
[--removed--]
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1y ago
Short but elegant comment
[deleted] 1y ago
[--removed--]
Loneliness-inc LvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 1y ago
What follows is a juicy comment that will probably get censored. So here it is.
There is something wrong with you. Like it or not, plenty of women don't have this problem and plenty of women do. The ones that do will claim that men are "using them for sex" because they don't want to look in the mirror and come to terms with the fact that they need to make some serious changes on how they go about things if they want to be viewed as someone worth being in a relationship with. There may be other things I can't think of off the top of my head but here are some things to think about.
1) Do you know how to compliment his life? Do you think you should be able to compliment his life?
2) Do you have an incessant need for attention and validation? So much so that you're willing to use others to get attention and validation from them?
3) Are you a pain in the ass?
4) When you hang out with his friends, do you blend in or are you the center of attention?
5) Do you have career goals that are realistic and that you're working towards.
6) Can you take care of yourself?
7) If your son (hypothetical situation) brought home a woman like yourself, would you be excited or concerned?
8) Do you respect yourself?
9) Are you able to be honest with yourself?
10) Are you willing to make compromises?
11) Are you willing to admit you're wrong?
12) Are you willing to get to know him?
Be mindful that if this comment in any way pisses you off or offends you, that is all the proof you need that you're someone not worth being in a relationship with.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago
Pearls before swine, friend.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
bam.
DextroShade 1y ago
99%+ of women would fail #11, you would seriously need to waterboard these modern women to get them to admit they were wrong.
Loneliness-inc LvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 1y ago
Here is OP's response to the comment, quoted above
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
"Something something it's still men's fault that I chose poorly in whom to open my legs for, and men should just show up an offer a ring on demand despite them clearly being able to go snatch diving with their flesh snorkel without needing to give me one."
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Yup. Can’t be her fault. It’s something wrong with the men, even after see sees their IG 6 months later and he’s hugging his new girlfriend in a bunch of photos. OP gets treated like a whore while other women get treated like a lady. Must be the men’s fault.
DextroShade 1y ago
Accountability is kryptonite.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
"Oh, well it can never be my fault because...."
Ad infinitum. I've seen plenty of whores like these, not because I'm super popular, just that I've been in the late-night scene for a while and the ones that circulate and show up with a different dude every other week have that long stare that most here know is a warning.
Sure sweetie, you're the perfect little snow-bunny working your cottontail all over town. Get the fuck outta here with that whore bullshit.
Loneliness-inc LvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 1y ago
Accountability is a tool of the patriarchy!!!
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
Of course that was the answer. Life is going to give her hard lessons and yet she is not going to learn because she is just that dumb.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
She sure can spin that hamster wheel, though! Look at it go!
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
And as a result, Fancy Feast and boxed wine stonks go brrrrrrrrt!
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1y ago
...and all of the dudes in my friendzone haven't been Chadly enough thusfar.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Yup. Guarantee if she's fuckable she's known men willing to do more than fuck her, but she refuses to see them as options. Maybe she should stop giving out free pussy samples to people that are obviously not ever going to buy at the price she's demanding?
[deleted] 1y ago
[--removed--]
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago Stickied
Yes
Loneliness-inc LvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 1y ago
This is the correct answer
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
It's called solipsism. Even the most intelligent women suffer from this. https://therationalmale.com/2015/09/02/solipsism-i/
chunky 1y ago
She goes out with many men. Some aren't Chad enough for her, so she doesn't smash. She is boring, or difficult to get along with, so these guys bounce.
Some are Chad enough for her to smash, and once they do, they only want her for easy fun. They have options and she is just one.
She wants a man with options, and then wonders why she's treated as optional.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1y ago
The unifying theme about all these women I've met in my personal life that just get used for sex is they try to use their sexual appeal to attract men instead of enhancing their relationship value.
Men can spot a relationship quality girl like blood in the water to a shark even if he's not into her personally. A man can just as easily tell when a girl just gives party and fun vibes, and uses her as such accordingly because she's there and that's what she's putting forward as her "best foot" so to speak
Then they get confused like OP why men pump and dump them or only want them for consistent sex
High chances this girl never really came across as relationship material and thus was never really treated like a relationship kind of girl.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Sadly, I believe you're mistaken that men, in general, can spot a relationship quality girl like blood in the water. The modern passive-aggressive game that women use to control men is highly effective: They demand that most men approach them and reject men for the most trivial of reasons undermining his self-confidence. This causes many men to focus on being accepted by a woman rather than on her openly displayed red flags or even searching for them as he may be too busy jumping through hoops or passing shit tests to conduct his own.
Basically, if a woman is decent looking and otherwise not a total train wreck and puts the most minor effort into finding a decent man whose employed and utilizes a thirst trap to make men wait for sex proving himself to her, she should have been able to find a reasonably decent man. The fact that she couldn't probably means she's aiming too high, she markets herself poorly, or she has little else to offer non-sexually.
DextroShade 1y ago
Something about her likely screams "RECREATIONAL USE ONLY" to these men, maybe she has tattoos or da nger hair or just has a bad attitude or demeanor. She is doing something to put herself in that category or she exclusively choosing fuckboys who aren't going to commit to anyone; either way she only has herself to blame as most men want relationships.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
"at first they talk to me somewhat frequently and actually seem to be interested in me as a PERSON".
There you go. This is it. She wants validation just for existing. She craves it like a junkie craves drugs. Nearly all young women want you to be 'amazed' at them just for them being who they are. Listen carefully to their psycho-babble ..... being the best version of themselves .... actualising their authentic selves .... being true to themselves.... knowing their value....
This is all fem-talk for the idea that women are just amazing if they just sit there. Men are the ones that need to do things, to have ambition and we can then judge them by their achievements (money is the scorecard to judge if their achievements are valid).
The reason why men only want sex from this women is because its all she has to offer.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Weird, my wife doesn't have that problem. Oh well, it must be the men...
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago
Note how she refers to her former lover:
And there is is, boys. Note the bitterness in her tone that he didn't give her what she wanted. She inserted all those sex coins and no commitment fell out. That's the man she wants... the man she will run to the moment he pops onto her Facebook / IG / whatever feed.
Alpha widow mode activated... and it's not you. The reason the next guy... and the next guy... and the next guy... and the guy she ends up with, will never have her best is that this guy exists. He's not any better than the guy she ends up with (it's likely that he's much worse): it's that he got to her first.
There's a reason why women who marry as virgins are far less likely to initiate divorce than women who are not, and that's often because women have a strong tendency to bond with the first man they have sex with. The more men a woman has been with, the more likely it is that she bonded with one of them in a way that can't be overridden.
The tendency is so strong that any number greater than zero is like playing Russian Roulette with three rounds in the cylinder.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
This is why n-count is so important.
I once heard a speaker compare this attachment to a piece of tape. Everyone starts off sticky and able to bond strongly with another. But if you separate after the sex, it's like ripping off the tape. The next time, you're just not as sticky.
And especially for women, once that count gets up there, you start seeing physical and mental signs (such as the thousand cock stare and depression), a complete inability to bond at all. All the stick is gone from her tape, and it can never be repaired. She is a useless woman, good for nothing.
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Lots of words just to say that pussy is all she has to offer, and even that isn't enough to keep men.
Edit: naw fuck it , I'm going in.
Most men, because we live in simpworld, will tolerate a lot of bad behavior and bitch shit from women just to fuck. I don't blame the men because it's just a matter of experience (eventually, all men take the red pill...orally or as a suppository).
But the women... They know it and willingly use the promise of sex against men.
This post-wall Pauline expects sympathy from who? Men? Fellow carousel riders? No.
The sad fact that everyone knows is this: she gave up her pussy thinking that it was enough to counterbalance the cunt behavior that she has. It isn't. And, because women are slow learners until they hit the wall, she didn't do a damn bit of root-cause analysis to figure out why she couldn't keep a man after offering what she thought was the most important thing a woman can give.
For any woman who ventures here, I'll give you some free game: your pussy is not magic, special, or unique. The 3 billion of you all come with pussy installed from the factory. Don't think that it's gonna keep a man. We'll fuck you, sure. But if you're a bitch, don't expect us to stay.
Smartcom5 1y ago
Hijacked for evident slap-chick-poetry!
Boar_excrement Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
If you don't like being a plate, then stop treating dating as a buffet to choose from.
[deleted]