This ties in nicely with 3 recent posts on the topic of younger women going for older guys:

First one

Second one

Third one

LOL @ all the wailing and gnashing of teeth over pOwEr DyNaMiCs. Women frequently rail about wanting "equal partners", but their actions always betray their hypergamy. They want a man superior to them, one they can look up to.

Additionally, and I say this all the time, but if a 19-year-old woman is still a child and thus unable to consent, then she also should not be allowed to do the following: vote, own property, sign contracts (to include with credit card companies), pose nude on the internet, own firearms, join the military, etc.

Anyway, to any lurking older women:

seethe, you hags!

Haha!

All these bitter hags bitching about Leo dating an 18 year-old would have no problem with her sucking dick on OnlyFans or getting puberty blockers, hormones, and surgeries (breasts chopped off) at 13. Their opinions are worthless on the subject and any man who's worth a damn knows that. Leo himself doesn't give a fuck what these used-up roasties think.

Women don't want to come to grips with reality. It is normal for a man of any age to be sexually attracted to any women whom has competed stage 5 of puberty. We call that fully sexually mature, and represents the height of a woman's fertility. Male instinct believes that is the height of sexual attractiveness.

These same women would not have a problem with an older woman who took an 18yo man as a sexual partner. They'd actually be cheering the "you go girl"s over and over.

At 18 we say a person has all the necessary maturity to make their own choices with their sexuality including dating outside of their age range. So an 18yo woman is gold digging Leonardo and he's letting her because he's getting some hot 18yo ass and he can afford it. And some old angry women and their white knight defenders are appalled that they have to know about a stark reminder that, they are old, the competition for average men their age is 10 years younger than they are. The competition for "good" (top 20%) men their age is 15 years younger than they are. And they are pissed they are being reminded that they need to be willing to slut it up with a "willing to put out after our coffee shop date" persona just to get a half glance from someone 15 years older than they are.

That OnlyFans example at the end, amongst other examples, is the kryptonite to their arguments. If you’re a consenting adult, have agency and authority over yourself, and “empowered” to sell full penetration videos of yourself for $0.99 to help you pay rent (probably to a man) and that’s not sexual exploitation, then how can you call a consensual age gap relationship exploitation?

Oh right, responsibility is a tool of the patriarchy.

That meme at the end is pure gold.

As a 30 year old guy i would never date a woman who is older than 23.

Old post-wall roasties can Cry me a river.

But 30 year female teachers sleeping with their 15 year old male students is perfectly acceptable?

There is something more here she is saying that is way deeper for her and women like her. This is emotions coming from somewhere deep in their primal instincts. The emotions you see in her post are visceral reactions from deep in her subconscious. This is gut level anxiety and fear.

My personal dime store evo psych guess is this ties directly into their instinct for survival. Seeing a high value, rich and famous man being able to pump and dump with abandon some of the hottest girls around must fill other women with anxiety and dread. For a girl who's primary asset is her looks and their control and access to their sex; so to see a man use her for sex and not give commitment in return gives other girls dread vicariously.

Everyone, not just women need to know that throughout history, the rich and powerful have always done this. The warlord, chieftain, first citizen, monarch, czar, Khan, Caesar, sultan, have always had some kind of pump and dump system. Harems, mistresses, kept women, high class prostitutes, conquered women from another tribe, whatever, the rich and powerful have always had access to women. The 80/20 rule always applied to those men.

You old biddies should have gotten married in your early 20s or stayed married in the case of divorced women, a lot of women never really grow up, they just grow old.

Old enough to vote, but not old enough to make their own dating choices?

Women want... CRAVE a value imbalance.

But power imbalance? Really? Who would listen if Leonardo DiCaprio went to the police, sobbing in tears, saying "she behaved inappropriately and touched me and I was scared" ?

It's worth nothing that, this is how the left and the self-hating cults that surround it can change the laws without changing the laws: By changing the meaning of words. If they make it so that a "power imbalance" (however is defined) counts as "sexual predation", then all the penalties prescribed in law for sexual predation automatically apply. Then they can use this newfound power to hire headhunters to go after couples with an age difference.

Unfortunately for the left and the self-hating cults that surround it, and fortunately for everyone else, this is a bridge too far even for our current clown legal system.

Old enough to elect our leaders. Old enough to fight wars. Old enough to go into crippling student loan debt. Old enough to kill a child.

They're old enough for power and responsibility, but the second they start competing for men then they're helpless little girls who can't think for themselves.

Nota's Rule of Feminism I Just Made Up:

"All adult women are infinitely strong and independent, except when making decisions that a) could have consequences, b) threaten another women higher up in status, or c) could improve the life of a man in any way."