Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
- Main Forums
- What's Hot
- TRP.RED
- Tribe Forums
- TheRedPill
- Tribe Management
- Create New Tribe
- Manage My Tribes
- Find New Tribes
- Recent News
-
-
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
She sends men mixed signals and she gets mixed results.
Only women are surprised by this.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1y ago
These men are just supposed to wait until she realizes she doesn't have better options for her to finally warm up to them you misogynist
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
And she'll make them wait until she's 45 to boot.
Loneliness-inc LvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 1y ago
And by that time, she has already been thoroughly booted.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
A deceased friend of mine referred to this behavior as "glass jarring". In which a woman expects a dude to just hang around forever getting nothing like he's a dick in a glass container marked Break In Case of Emergency.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
Sadly, most wives treat their husbands that way.
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 1y ago
So, a severe case of too little, too late. Sorry, Mother Teresa, maybe being cold and distant to a guy who's into you just doesn't really work too well.
[deleted] 1y ago
[--removed--]
Aphr00dita 1y ago
She established a pattern.
Bravo. First step completed.
I can't imagine to be any of those if someone not annoying or huge pain in the ass would approach me about it. Anything from 4\10 + CB (cool babe) would get answer if asking really polite (also offering something non sexual for advice) and 2 or 3 times (invested in knowledge). If she get this feedback she is below 4CB and well below if consistent pattern.
Edit
Who am kidding. I never met such woman anyways
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
This is the dating market working exactly as women shaped it. A battle of the sexes. Nobody is there to be good, honest, or loyal. People like that get snatched off the market right away and stay off the market. 1 or 2 dates and they stick together. Not some endless parade of random hook up screenings.
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 1y ago
That's exactly why you won't find good women in dating apps. They're not there - they don't need to be there. People around them know their worth, and they themselves don't have to make a point of being a strong independent woman. And yet, our lady here is still single; I wonder why.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
I met my wife on match 22 years ago. Our widow friend met a nice man online about 5 years ago as well. The widow set her standards reasonably, was not demanding, and quickly found someone and got married. Once they made an (actual) effort to find someone, they were quickly off the market.
In times past, women met men via lots of social events such as church festivals, weddings (and funerals), school, and "social media" (gossip between neighborhood mothers, faster than gig fiber). Courtship was in the home, chaperoned, and not about milking men for free goodies and entertainment in exchange for 3rd date sex. "good women" might engage in long courtships, but they were respectful affairs (in the highest sense of the word). Reputation mattered back then, for men and women, and Rhett Butler was cast as a "scoundrel" in Gone With The Wind for taking a woman out on a date and not returning her home in time when something COULD have happened and NOT marrying her. That's right: He was shunned from "polite society" for going out on a traditional date and getting her home late.
My grandmothers were born in the 1910s. My paternal grandmother's sister rejected some guy who was courting her and she said "I liked him. I saw my opportunity and grabbed it!" and she expressed a desire for him. He would become my grandfather.
Boar_excrement Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
There is something to be said for limiting the options pool. You choose the best of what was available and get on with life.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
The key to this limited options was that they were sincere. When people dated back then, they were geared towards marriage. We hear about "hookup culture" today, but that's been in place largely since the 1970's with women going out to date with strange men where he plies her with goodies and if she doesn't put out, he moves on. Even in the 1950's, men were griping that women were using them for goodies and women griped men tried to get them to "put out" BUT women drove this. They LIKED the goodies but wanted men to be "gentlemen" and the fathers would blame the men while literally pimping out their daughters for free meals.
Courtship geared towards marriage meant a different “three date rule” in that if a woman wasted his time, he’d move on quickly while the ones she liked courted her at her parents’ home AT HER PARENT’S EXPENSE (see Michael Corleone and Apollonia)
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
What's funny is I can go to the Philippines and get a gf in 10sec and it's pretty much expected that she wants to get married and have kids. If I go online there it's just the undesirables, ladyboys, leftover women and gold diggers. If I go to a club there it's hoes and prostitutes. It's kinda like that all over Asia.
I think that going forward we have to just categorize women. Some guys are doing this already and labeling them "recreational use only" and they use a series of red flags to identify them. It's like we're bringing back social stigma but in a covert manner to deal with women covertly changing the rules.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Interesting statement. How would you meet them? Just striking up conversations in public? Streets? Shops? What's the opening line? "Hello? How are you? My name is X?"
I think, perhaps, 60 years ago such an introduction and opener would have been the norm and quite acceptable but most western women would regard such an approach with trepidation unless the guy was hot. Do Phillippinas react with more friendliness to caucasian foreigners?
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Yeah you just walk up to them and say hi and ask them out. No big deal. It was the same in russia and thailand. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/C93W_-cDxmY
Sometimes they're married though and you find out after you cum in them, lol.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Translation: "The guys I'm not into are persistent and sometimes get into my pants, while the dudes I get wet for know I'm a chum bucket castoff, so they ghost me if I try to be something beyond a convenient pump."
Naturally she's "too nice", "too kind", "too loving" and loyal -- bitch, if any of that was true you'd be with a guy instead of whining somewhere on a social media platform.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
So she's upset that men she's not really interested in eventually take the hint and won't let her play her favorite game of Boy's Brain Ball anymore.
What a fucking cunt.
Edit: for any peanut gallery, most women know within minutes if not seconds if they will ever have any sexual interest in you. But never ever expect them to admit that they know, because they can get resources and utility by keeping things ambiguous. That's why they'll fuck a known jobless philanderer they've known all of 30 minutes in a bar bathroom, while making the average schlub they've known since childhood with a stable job cough up a ring or otherwise jump through a ridiculous set of hoops before giving him grudgingly rationed out duty sex. They know there is nothing to gain from withholding sex from the philanderer, he'll just instantly leave.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
One of the great blue pill myths is that men "enjoy" being the pursuer and providing for his "lady" but that sounds more like the product of centuries of brainwashing. This is easily disproven with this thought experiment: Ask most (sane) men if they'd prefer to be a handsome celebrity with women throwing themselves at him versus a chivalrous normal guy wining and dining a woman for years in exchange for a few pats on the head and "thank you!"
I think this ties into the other article I just posted where a woman frets she isn't turned on by ANYONE because her "hard to get game" has left her emotionally dead inside.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
My gut reaction: FUCK YEAH LADIES IT'S DATING LIKE DICAPRIO TIME! ALL ABOARD THE SS GLAWK GLAWK, EXCEPT FOR THOSE OF YOU OVER 25, HERE'S SOME HANDY DIRECTIONS TO THE NEAREST NURSING HOME, TRY NOT TO BREAK A HIP ON THE WAY THERE!
ahem. I mean, yeah, being rich and not being expected to bust my ass for scraps of attention would be nice.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Note that this applies to Chads and Tyrones who are often dirty poor hence "bailout" flair. Our society has pushed a bluepill narrative that men, including powerful and/or handsome men, enjoy "wining and dining" and pleasing women for the sake of it.
In a way, women finally see through this in that they are suspicious of "nice guy" intentions hence the shit tests. "Are you being a decent person because you're weak?" she's asking, in her reflexive driven manner. A woman would prefer a legitimately bad person in lieu of a decent one that she's unsure of their strength. As men start to see through it, they'll realize that chivalry has zero value. We can't bury the beast of woman entitlement feminism until we kill off the chivalrous beast that birthed it.
DextroShade 1y ago
This is where it would be good to ask the Kevin Samuels questions: how old are you, height, weight, dress size, how much does a man need to make, etc. She sounds like another entitled average-at-best basic bitch who is shooting down average men because she thinks she deserves high-value men who should simp for her.