Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
- Main Forums
- What's Hot
- TRP.RED
- Tribe Forums
- TheRedPill
- Tribe Management
- Create New Tribe
- Manage My Tribes
- Find New Tribes
- Recent News
-
-
Doricel 1y ago
When you want to become a Yu GI Oh card
Doricel 1y ago
How does she go through airport security?
DextroShade 1y ago
A textbook example of "wasting the pretty". This would be the equivalent of getting a Bugotti and then spray painting it with illegible gang tags, putting random bumper stickers on it, and adding those cheap panels that are secured with zip ties. Damn shame.
achilleslade 1y ago
Best way to stop demons from tormenting you is simply to become the demon.
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 1y ago
If mental health is really her problem, it is not going to be truly solved by making artificial body modifications. Rather, that will provide a short lived excitment that will wear off soon until she feels the need to chase after the next high. It will probably come in the form of more drastic changes. We can see the same thing with serial plastic surgery recipients, who keep getting more and more surgery until they no longer look human.
Whatever the cause of her depression, it was only masked up by making herself look this ridiculous. Happiness is not found in chasing temporary highs, but rather dealing with the root issue of your problems.
nicknack 1y ago
She was never wife material, now the outside just reflects the inside. To add, even if q broad has 1 notable tattoo I see her as the same as the bitch on the right. A tatted garbage slut.
Boar_excrement Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Why change gender when you can change species? She is damaged beyond the evolutionary tree.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1y ago
That's the saddest transformation I've ever seen in my life
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Imagine her at age 45 with faded tattoos, flabby skin, dental problems, broke, single. She shoulda saved the $250k, she's gonna need it.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago
Bold of you to assume that someone who lives that way will live that long.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
correct Lurker - I see a much truncated time line. Her antics are a cry for help, and she is not getting any help. Instead, she is being cheered on by the woke feminazis.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Witches live a long time...
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 1y ago
Yeah, does not compute. I've played quite a lot of SimCity and The Sims, but I'm no architect.
On a side note, there should be a point between an arm sleeve and a fucking mandala in your forehead where admittance into a psych ward was mandatory.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
If everyone that need to go to a psych ward was admitted - we'd need a psych ward about the size of .... gosh. Not sure its possible.
The one thing I always say to myself when I see the news is 'blimey, they shouldn't have shut down all those mental hospitals'.
Sometimes its cheaper to actually treat the mental health issues rather than have the lunatics wandering around the streets.
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I feel like I could catch multiple STDs just by been near her.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1y ago
Joke's on you, bub.
The eye-cancer kicks in way before the STDs start to get you.
No-Stress-Cat 1y ago
I wouldn't call her before photo exactly stunning. She was cute at best. Her now photo is just...sad.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
women don't need to be stunning to have a good life. I've said before - an average looking woman can enjoy an extraordinary life, full of the joy of family and with the care and protection of a loving husband. Hell, you can be below average looking as a woman and get all of that. All you need to do is not go full retard from the ages of 17-27. But they just can't resist pushing the self destruct button.
No-Stress-Cat 1y ago
Oh, how long can trusty Cadet Strumpy hold out? How could she possibly resist the diabolical urge to push the button that could erase her very existence? Will her tortured mind give in to her uncontrollable desires? Can she withstand the temptation to push the button that even now beckons her ever closer? Will she succumb to the maddening urge to eradicate purity at the mere push of a single button? The beautiful, shiny button! The jolly, candy-like button! Will she hold out folks? CAN she hold out?
NO SHE CAN'T!!! BZZZZZT!!!
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
Upvote for the "Ren And Stimpy" reference.
space madness!
Loneliness-inc LvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 1y ago
Whaaaaaaaaaaat??????
Nooooooooooooooooo!
DextroShade 1y ago
She lost those battles badly.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
Fucker beat me to it!
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1y ago
As mental health battles go, hers must've been Stalingrad.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
This is sad. Before we all jump in and talk shit about this poor woman, just remember that she is not going to have any kind of life. I doubt it will be a long life either. I'm over 50, but I'd bet that I'm going to live longer than her. And better too.
The real issue here is enabling. This was a young woman with some mental health issues. That's ok - lots of people have a few mental health issues, and with the loving kindness of family and friend, and perhaps some professional help, they can go on to overcome and live a decent life. But the real issue with feminism and wokery is that it enables people rather than helps people. Confused people get egged on by social justice warriors. They hear screams of encouragement - 'you go girl...you be your true self... fight the power, don't let men dictate how you should look etc etc.
If this young woman had been born into a decent family in a tight knit community in the 1950s, they would have spotted that she was depressed and they would have likely tried to help her. Nowadays, if a young kid says they identify as an otter, we have to go along with their delusions, otherwise its some how 'hate speech'.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
Feminism is a way for ugly chicks to convince people that being (physically and mentally) ugly is the new sexy. So, yes, another victim.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I'm not sure that you've fully understood the true nature of feminism. Being 'sexy' is pandering to the patriarchy, and prolonging the empire of oppression of women by men. Why would a woman want to be 'sexy'? That's just a way of continuing centuries of oppression and female slavery. True feminism is about making men puke at the very sight of a woman. True feminists regard the erect penis as the true enemy of female empowerment, so everything must be done to prevent erections. The mistake that you (and many others) make is that you think that feminists want to replace one beauty standard (the male one) with a more modern and inclusive beauty standard that includes, for example, blacks and fat women. But that would simply be replacing one problem with another problem, according to true feminist ideology. Let me explain:
True feminism regards male desire of women as the root cause of all evil. This is what explains their drive to make themselves as repulsive to men as possible - the blue hair, the hairy legs, shaved heads, stinking of patchouli oil. True feminism is a war on desire. When the last man has his last erection and see's his penis shrivel up and point to the floor in defeat, that is when the true feminists will raise their hands aloft (exposing their hairy and stinking armpits) in victory.
This is true feminism. It is the war on inter-sex desire. The fact that the human race will die out is a small price to pay for emancipation from the slavery of the patriarchy. (Because without male desire of females, there are no erections, which means there is no delivery of sperm, which means no babies). Look - if you don't believe that this is true, you need to read more about the origins and teachings of feminism. Just because it makes no sense doesn't mean its not real.
Many feminist scholars have alluded (but not solved) the paradox of feminism - that it will lead to the annihilation of the human race (because nobody will be able to breed). Early feminists (like Germaine Greer in the 60s) suggested that the solution would be to take sperm samples from every male shortly after puberty, and then castrate them entirely - not just cutting off their balls but their penis as well. Then, as the eunuch grows older, and has earned enough social points by serving the sisterhood, they can earn the right for their sperm to be released from a central holding pen to be used for reproduction. This system would ensure that only the most feminist men would be able to reproduce, and only by serving as a sort of work horse for the sisterhood.
More modern feminism looks to technology to solve the reproductive issue. They believe that women will be able to rise up, defeat their male overlords, and use technology to create artificial sperm. Babies can then be incubated in chambers. Male babies will be exterminated at the foetus stage. Since technology has eliminated the need for men (the final use of them being to provide sperm) it would be safter to terminate all male life forms.
If this all sounds a bit nihilistic, you'd be correct. Feminism is a self hatred cult, where the believers not only hate themselves with a passion, but hate all of humanity to the point where they insist that we must all take radical steps to destroy our own species. The fact that feminists go out of their way to make themselves as unattractive as possible is only the first step. It just symbolic.
TRPDuryodhana 1y ago
This has to be a fucking joke lol. I tried looking, but couldn't really find anything on Google. Can you give me some sources for this?
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I had a look online to try and find the source.... I read a review of Germain Greers 'The Female Eunuch' about 30 years ago. You can't really take this shit seriously, but it is real alright. Feminist theory is also appallingly badly written, full of errors, contradictions and circular reasoning (as typo would say, consistency really does seem to be a tool of the patriarchy). But the gist of the 'true' feminists is that women can never be safe and free as long as they are enslaved by the patriarchy. And given that men are stronger, the only freedom is going to come from enslaving men, and basically keeping them as farm animals. All PIV sex is basically a violence against women, essentially rape, because women cannot consent because they are beholden to men, because men have the power and money.
The solution of every revolutionary is to rise up and vanquish the oppressor. The only safety for women is to enslave and emasculate men, by castration.
The truth is that feminism has its roots in what is so clearly the ravings of untreated mental illness. What you see today, when women call themselves feminists, esp young American women, that isn't feminism at all. Because going out of dates with men, letting a man pay for your dinner is completely incompatible with feminist theory.
TRPDuryodhana 1y ago
The title itself gives me everything I need to know about the content here; just some victimhood puking and male bashing as usual.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
It's actually far more insane than you could imagine. If feminists were to get what they wanted, we wouldn't need to worry about the mid to long term effects of the human race not being able to breed. We wouldn't make it to the medium term, because we would all die out in the short term. The lights would go out within 10 days. Within 90 days, a quarter of the population would be dead, because of no access to drinking water (typhoid, cholera, diphtheria etc) More than 50% would die in the following winter, with no power or heat or food.
What they are asking for (the enslavement of the male species, for the safety of the females) is certain doom. But hey, anything for the sisterhood, amiright?
RedPill115 1y ago
True...but you're missing the next step.
The true point of feminism is to maintain control over women by destroying the next step women naturally hit - attaching to a guy.
A single lonely woman is easier for a corporation to exploit, and political messaging to exploit as her lonliness causes her to instinctually seek out and cling to any tribal/social narrative.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I think you're ascribing too much logic and reason to the whole thing. You're assuming that the feminism project is some sort of corporate strategy, so that they can make more money?? Not a chance. The majority of corporations I consult for are not in the least bit interested in making profits, because profits are racist, evil and bad.
The big mistake I made, until recently, was to try and understand the world thorough the prism of logic and reason. And this makes it very very difficult (nearly impossible) to ascertain what is actually going on. Because what is going on, with feminism for example, makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. If feminists got what they wanted (the subjugation or elimination of the males of the species) then it wouldn't work out. It's literally compleley insane.
heres the thing - just because somethings completely insane, doesn't mean its not real. The current push to Net Zero is totally insane and will result in global poverty AND higher net carbon emissions. The green new deal is insane and will bankrupt us AND result in a worse envoironment. Cutting your dick off and putting lipstick on and demanding that people say that you are a woman - its insane, but doesn't mean its not happening. Women tatooing the whites of they eyes? just because it doesn't make sense, doesn't mean its not happening.
TRPDuryodhana 1y ago
You might enjoy the work the 19th century german philosopher, Arthur Schopenhuaer. As he wrote in his masterpieace, "The will-to-live is the quintessence of this world; it is what animates and drives everything."
He argued that the world is driven by a blind, insatiable will that seeks only to satisfy its own desires and impulses, regardless of whether or not these impulses are rational or logical. That human beings are caught up in this irrational will, which drives them to pursue their own desires and interests even when doing so may not make rational sense.
In this case, feminism, the political cutl, is no different.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Yes, Schopenhauer is very interesting. But I think he is himself falling into the trap of trying to find a rational reason to explain how the world works. In his case, he calls it the 'will to live'.
But that does not explain things like the current ESG and D&I obsessions. I work as a business analyst and I see it everywhere - organisations are basically committing suicide. They are saying that profits are WEB (wrong, evil and bad). They have long since dropped the objectives of 'creating value' for shareholders (who are the fucking owners of the business) and instead are 100% focused on social justice issues, which are all of them loss making. The current bud light saga is just a drop in the ocean - most banks that I examine are actively trying to go bankrupt...by lending at very low rates to bad borrowers in the ESG sector, and refusing to lend to very good borrowers in the hydrocarbon sector. They only care about BLM, ESG and D&I and the drive to Net Zero.
None of this makes any sense. A large org that is committed to self destruction (but hey, we've got a black CEO, so like, we're so cool n stuff?) cannot be explained by the 'will to live' argument. It is a will to die.
My learning is that you cannot look at the world and try to demand that it somehow makes sense. You need to look at it, and just identify what it is (not what you think it ought to be). You have to abandon your own child like prefernce for things that make sense, and realise that some things just do not make sense.
It makes no sense for large organisations to be committed to their own collapse. But that is what I see. It makes no sense for a biological organism to cut off or damage its own reproductive organs so that it cannot reproduce. But that is what Ellen Page and others like her are doing, in ever increasing numbers. It makes no sense for a country like the UK to pursue a policy that will 100% guaranteed result in poverty and economic collapse (net zero) but that is what they are doing.
RedPill115 1y ago
I've spent like 5 years trying to figure these things out in corporate so I find what you're writing relatable...but that's another topic.
You wrote this:
You are 100% right, but it was more useful to me to get to the next step.
The true point of feminism is to maintain control over women
by destroying the next step women naturally hit - attaching to a guy.
Have tried to come up with a way to explain...but dunno it's hard to describe what the difference is, just know this perspective has been more useful to me.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
When you say "the true point of feminism is to maintain control over women" ...by whom do you mean? Who is trying to control women?
Try and think about it from the womans (sorry, Woperson) perspective. Bear with me ...(this is the feminist perspective, not mine) Throughout history, women have been owned and controlled by men. They have owned us much the same way that they owned cows or sheep. The value of women was in their reproductive capacity. The act of marriage is a man buying a daughter from a father. The only reason why men enslave women is because they desire them, ipso faco, it is male desires of women which is the source of all oppression for women, for thousands of years. Male desire causes the penis to become enlarged like a weapon, and then that weapon is used to violate and rape women ...because all sex is rape. We know that all sex is rape because women are held against their will in a slave / master relationship (marriage) where they are not able to consent - consent is not possible where you are an owned chattel.
The past 10,000 years proves that men and women cannot live in equality because men are stronger than women and will always subjugate them into a subservient, demeaning and degrading slave roles. The only way for women to be free and safe from the violence of controlling and raping men is for women to rise up and subjugate the male species. Only then will women walk free.
In the mean time, the symbols of the patriarchy are things like making yourself attractive to men. That is prolonging the enslavement of women, things like high heels, shaving your legs, being pretty etc. The path to freedom involves hairy legs, a bit hairy pussy, blue hair, half shaved head with undercut, full sleeve of tats, etc. This shows independence from the patriarchy.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
maybe feminism is different here in Europe. I often hear US women talking about being feminists and I think 'what crack are you smoking?' First of all, your entire look is pandering to the male gaze. It's basically not possible to be both a feminist AND expect men to pay for dinner on a date, in the European feminist tradition.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
Feminism isn't quite so monolithic. Yes, many radical feminists as far back as the 1960s and 1970s believed as you're saying. There are others who see using their security to manipulate and exploit men (eg Hooters waitresses, strippers, OnlyFans and e-thots on other platforms, hookers, etc) as "liberating" and "empowering".
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
the 'true' feminists would regard those MIW as 'crypto feminists' or even worse, traitors. They would regard the hooters waitresses in the same light as the slaves regarded the black prison guards and farm hands back in the day - traitors. What could be more 'sleeping with the enemy' that dressing up for the male gaze and working in hooters?
I would argue that what we see as feminism is basically just the more recent form, which is, as you rightly point out, OF, hooters, hookers or some form of digital hooker. It's not feminism at all, its a silent and nihilisitic surrender to the patriarchy. Its every sister for herself. But it still requires the patriarchy to function. Theres no difference in gender dynamics between the Victorian prostitute standing on a street corner in the fog of 1860's London and the 2023 e-thot on OF shaking her money makers for tokens.
SpiritualEnema Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
This is a great take. After posting my rant earlier I looked back and thought to myself: “This is somebody’s daughter”. The correct response is your response; sadness mixed with a bit of rage at the people who encourage and enable this kind of permanent, debilitating behavior.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Well, your 'rant' was well written and funny. But yes, on a serious note, we (men) should feel only compassion and remorse for this poor woman. As you say, this is somebodies daughter. And...it could have been somebodies wife, and therefore, somebodies mother. She could have had a very different life, if she had the the guidance and protection of a loving male character. The very thing that feminists are fighting (the patriarchy) would have been able to gently steer this woman away from self deletion (I believe that she will never reproduce, and I estimate her chances of surviving the temptation to commit suicide as very low). A loving father that was invovled in her life would have helped her. A husband would have protected her against her instincts to destroy herself. And having her own children would have given her life meaning and joy.
Instead she is looking at a joyless and grim future.
When we say that men are the protectors and providers for women, we don't just mean protecting them from predators. We mean protecting them from themselves.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
Why, you misogynistic, patriarchal SHITLORD!
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I need to volunteer at the local re-ed camp to rid myself of these urges!!!
SpiritualEnema Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
You’ve transformed yourself into someone you’re proud of being eh?
She is physically revolting, convicted drug trafficking topless waitress at a biker bar turned OnlyFans niche porn gutter skank. Not a very good one at that. Isn’t the whole point of being successful at drug trafficking to be as inconspicuous as possible? I’m shocked that she was caught, or that a cop didn’t buy her story of shipping “bibles” to the nearest nunnery.
Also, consider that this take is the GOOD way to frame her life. Her rant is industrial grade copium. If you think she is actually proud of who she has become then I have a bridge to sell you. Nobody who practices self acceptance or shit even self awareness does these extreme things to themselves.
On the plus side, the three weeks that she spent blind were no doubt the happiest 3 weeks of her life.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
you have a great writing style!
"She is physically revolting, convicted drug trafficking topless waitress at a biker bar turned OnlyFans niche porn gutter skank."
This sentence has a great cadence to it. Almost poetic.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
This transformation is the perfect example of what happens when women have zero restrictions on their hive-mind-follow-every-flash-in-the-pan-trend. Its on her body, its the stupid septum ring, its the whole damned thing.
Its been said before that women are basically barely-matured children mentally, and its scary as fuckall to see how true this is.
For the ones that didn't have access to the cash to turn themselves into a tattooed refugee, they still will go as far as they can until they run out of cash. The lip-injection trend comes to mind. Its fucking disgusting.
Can I just get into a hibernation pod and set it for 100 years from now? I feel like an alien who crash-landed on earth as it is with all this crazy shit going on.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
What, you don't love a nice trout-pout?
You've never fantasized about making out with a coelacanth?
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Bwhahahaha, oh god no... lolol
Its like in one of those RPG games where you can randomize the sliders for your character... like... god, they actually CHOSE to do this to themselves. Shudder
Seagram7 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
This girl is the extreme example, but all that are obvious signs of deep mental illness. She really took attention and validation to the extreme. Most women that do the chest tattoos, gauge piercings, weird hair color, are all exhibiting the result of some form of mental trauma. I guess that any attention is better than no attention since a woman being invisible was a death sentence when we were hunter/gathers.
[deleted] 1y ago
[--removed--]
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1y ago
You forgot about broken dreams and an empty hole where her life purpose used to be, too
[deleted] 1y ago
[--removed--]
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
None of her holes are empty
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1y ago
Touche
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I bet you anything this bitch has so many piercings on her meatflaps that there's metallic tinkling sounds every time she takes a step.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
She's spent a quarter million on making the exterior of her body reflect the true nature of an e-thot's soul.
Fun fact: The approximate average that US women spend on make-up during their lifetime is... yep, around $250,000. This chick just spent it all at once.
Edit: I was wrong. It's actually more like $300,000. https://www.allure.com/story/average-woman-spends-on-makeup
redpillschool Everybody tag him 1y ago
The highschool trapper-keeper comment. oh my god haha
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1y ago
Well she's more "comfortable" now. That's all that really matters.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
She looks about as comfortable as a fakir on his bed of nails.
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 1y ago
Mahana you ugly!