Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
polishknight
Posted 1y ago in Epiphany Phase - Permalink - Locked - 15.7K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Guys this line of thinking comes from social constructionism. What she wants is a guy to enter her frame, pedestalize her, and develop ONEITIS. She had that with one guy. I agree, that's a very toxic relationship. And she dumped him because of it.
The feminine imperative tells her that she can maximize her sexual strategy by having sex with a guy, getting him pussy-whipped, and then use sex to control him. She doesn't necessarily realize she's doing this because of all the blue pill ideology of "love", "dating", etc. Hat's off to the Chads who know this and maintained frame and just pumped and dumped her.
DextroShade 1y ago
Women will tend to do this: have one serious long-term relationship that ends badly and then ride the cock carousel until their body count is so high that they are broken and unable to have another serious relationship.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Its like a Black Mirror episode, minus all the idiot ideology stuff for "modern audiences".
She's trapped behind an invisible plane, as far as the eye can see. While she was hot, she had the ability to pull these men into her parallel dimension and extract time/resources/money from them.
Now, the siren call grows too weak to tunnel past the barrier.
As time ticks on and her beauty turns into gnarled wrinkles and drooping chin/eyelids/breasts and ass, she sends one final message out into the ether -- what could it be? What did I do wrong?
Oh sweetie, can't you see? You are the monster, and now, your reward lies in the formless void protected by "The Wall".
No-Stress-Cat 1y ago
That was sheer poetry, man.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
For the lips of an adulteress drip honey
And smoother than oil is her speech;
But in the end she is bitter as wormwood,
Sharp as a two-edged sword.
Her feet go down to death,
Her steps take hold of Sheol.
She does not ponder the path of life;
Her ways are unstable, she does not know it.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Frickin' nice, that was.
Curious to the source? If its original, well - damn well done.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Proverbs 5
3,000 year old wisdom written by a guy with a private harem of ~1000 women.
You reminded me of it with this line:
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Ever see "The Banshees Of Inisherin"? There's something about your demeanor that reminds me of Brendan Gleeson's character.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Guess I'll have to now!
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I was visualizing in part the man-trap Scarlett Johansson used in "Under The Skin" (2013), disrobing and leading the guy into the interior of the house, as he sinks below the floor to his doom.
Thanks, man.
ZZoMBiE13 1y ago
This is what happens when all of a woman's friends tell her she's amazing. This lump likely has no personality whatsoever. She may still look good, who knows? Let's assume for this exercise that she does. But if she had any kind of personality then she'd likely be able to make something click somewhere. There are men out there still looking for coupling. They just don't want a brick of wood to spend time with.
She doesn't realize she's been relegated to "Recreational Use Only" status. But you know all of her friends tell her she's amazing and funny and so wonderful. Likely they don't even believe it.
That or she is one of 1000 other bad bitch types who is off putting to be around for too long. This one would almost be sad if it weren't for the fact that in all of this infodump she shared at no point was any personal reflection taken. No revelatory moment of "oh, maybe it's me?" anywhere in there. It's the men's fault for not falling for her you see, it's not incumbent upon her to look into seeing their needs at all. Just show up and fall for me damn it! Who gave those smelly men the right to do what's best for them?
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
What I find remarkable is the inability to engage in self-improvement. Either it's denial, blame, or even acceptance/self-loathing, but when it comes to their romantic relationships with men, the modern idea is that men should improve for women and "man up", but not vice-versa where a man should take her "just as she is."
I labeled this "epiphany phase" because it's the point where someone realizes something is seriously off and they're at a turning point. For me, I was just about the same age and accepted that there were things about women I couldn't change so I had to just adapt to it which I did. Now married with a child. For me, it was an easy pill to swallow, pun intended, in that I had to make a tradeoff but for women, it means burying their childhood dreams of entitlement.
I would guess, and this is conjecture, is the classic case of a woman not understanding that just because a man is willing to have sex with her, doesn't mean he will commit to her. My grandmother back in the 1940's could have told her this. Back then, a woman wouldn't sleep with chad because 1) She knew that didn't equate to commitment from the chad and 2) it would give her a bad reputation.
RedPirate751 1y ago
I listened to an excellent podcast (love the host, he's exceptionally thoughtful and asks great questions of his guests) over the weekend with a "relationship psychologist" type guest. Yes, the psychologist was a woman. Interestingly she actually agreed with most of TRP but it totally lost me at the end because she actually called TRP out as "damaging".
She claimed we are the male equivalent of feminism and that we are doing to men what feminism did to women. Bullshit. TRP is the logical reaction to feminism. It is not mens' job to fix the broken social contract between men and women. We didn't fucking break it.
It never ceases to amaze me how many people can see the problem, see what caused it, even see some of the solutions to it, but then absolutely fail to complete the puzzle.
Like all natural processes, this bullshit will continue...until it can't. Then and only then will it begin to move in the other direction.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I think men were complicit in breaking it. The minute the suffragettes formed a little club and got it into their foolish heads that voting was somehow their right, men should have shut it down. Same with all feminist movements, same with every relationship where women wore the pants over all of history.
Where we went wrong was allowing women any power over us at all. Women were created to be helpers of men, and under their leadership and protection. Women were not meant to lead, control, or dominate.
Anyway I'm not being anti-man here, I'm saying we were equally at fault by allowing hypergamy/feminism to take root, grow, and finally take over society. Because our ancestors were slaves to the V and dared not gainsay her majesty.
Lionsmane8 1y ago
Thank you.
Paradoxically, it is men's fault, once again!
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Imagine the parallel timeline we'd be in if instead of giving women the vote, we merely suggested "Talk to your husband about how he should vote."
Because that is what it was anyway, and the man could ignore her whims and illogical choices.
If I only had a portal to cross into that universe...
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
If instead of giving women the vote without requiring them to sign up for national service, the law allowed them the option to choose whether or not they sign up for national service but if they choose not to, they lose the right to vote as well.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
That was also the popular opinion of women themselves before the amendment was passed. It was the vocal Karen minority that ruined everything.
But don't worry, since we gave women the right to vote, our country has only improved! Right?!?
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I appreciate your sarcasm.
It just kills me knowing that a floating cloud of estrogen that can think differently from hour to hour is making decisions that have permanent consequences. As I'm sure you are aware.
I still maintain some kind of hope, but I don't know for how long...
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
First off, feminism is an extension of chivalrous entitlement rather than an "equality" movement. After all, what does modern feminism espouse that has anything to do with equality? Abortion, free daycare/healthcare? TRP isn't merely a reaction to feminism but also the basis for re-evaluating the failed enlightenment movements of the 1700's that birthed the disastrous French Revolutions and USSR but also the corporatism that has dehumanized western men. Although there are a variety of perspectives in TRP, it has emerged as an ideology in its own right.
What I think feminist apologists would like is to bring things back to the 1950's, but with the goodies of workplace equality of course, and just have men go back to competing to please women who reward us with conditional sex treats and keep us around if we're good. Many men I know don't have a problem with that, but I do. Ironically, the shit tests of modern women to punish nice guys has reminded men of what old fashioned masculinity was like: MEN were in charge and women served us, not the other way around.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
It's more correct to say that each gender "served" the other in specific, traditional ways that complimented each other and made sense. Men provided/protected and steered the family with their decisions, women submitted to their leadership, remained loyal, and kept the home. As each gender kept their side of the social contract, each reaped the rewards.
Also, I'm speaking idealistically, I realize it was never actually this perfect, except maybe before that stupid chick ate that fruit.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I think that's the key. Women rarely do things without the approval of the female pack. Remove the stigma, taboo, and consequences, and there's nothing to hold them back.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
What's funny is men do learn to take (and use) a woman "just as she is". Which means no expectation that she will ever be anything other than what she initially is.
But what this means for most women is they are getting treated as disposable hoes. Concubine class at best. But certainly not wife-tier. Oops!
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago Stickied
Part of 'just as she is" with my wife was that I wanted to see if she was willing to make basic concessions to me during the courtship phase. Even now, 20 years later, we still argue like hell but at least we are engaged in a negotiation instead of "if you don't want it this way, then goodbye."
What modern women don't realize, and I wish someone had told me when I was 20, was that modern dating nowadays is men say whatever women want to hear to get laid. You make funny jokes, you act cool, you pay for dates, and you eat the turd sandwich to get laid because until then, she's fickle as heck. Then after that, you're in power and can negotiate because she can't use sex as a leverage tool anymore and without it, it's like my wife's cat that used to scratch us but after I clipped her nails, she couldn't figure out what to do. :-) (It was funny. She had this perplexed look on her face and finally hissed and walked off in disgust.)
So that's the stage of courtship that women don't get is that they think they have commitment: The guy said all she wants to hear, he paid for some dates, and she knows he's committed because she finally had sex with him, yes? But that's actually when courtship for us men really begins.
My high school coach, RIP, said that the key to success was this one particular runner who said that he really began his "running game" at the last minute or so. He'd wait until then and that's how he defeated the other runners. For a half century, women have conditioned men to only be successful if we have game. Well, now we do.
Lionsmane8 1y ago
Yup, "seduction" is a shared responsibility (it takes two to tango) and "retention" is on them.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Yeah it's funny how women don't like it when men learn to be as fickle as women.
Maybe they should have thought about that before picking the "betrayal" strategy in a society wide Prisoner's Dilemma when the other gender has a much longer reproductive window.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
This line is so great that I am going to repeat it in all caps -> FOR HALF A CENTURY, WOMEN HAVE CONDITIONED MEN TO ONLY BE SUCCESFUL IF WE HAVE GAME. WELL, NOW WE DO.
This is a classic case study of the unintended consequences of misaligned behavioural reward systems. Imagine if you had a dog, and you beat it and starved it. Then one day it bites you, you immediately give it a steak. Next day you beat and starve it. A week late it bites you, and you give it another steak and stop beating it.
We all know what will happen - the opposite of what you want. The dog will bite you and everyone else. This is what women have done. They only sleep with badboyz (TM) and they ignore and laugh at niceguyz. You know what happens? They years roll by and the nice guys figure out the game, and they transition into bad boyz.
Me personally, I started out as a nice guy. It didn't take me long to realise that it gets you zero pussy. So I became a jerk. It was the only winning strategy, the one that would get me access to sex. Treating women with disrespect, getting a reputation as a man slut, being emotionally dishonest and manipulative, ghosting, smashing and dashing....that is what finally unlocked pussy for me.
Now they wonder why men behave the way they do?
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
The counterpart page of this makes fun of "nice guys" where the nice guys go "bad" when he's denied sex showing he wasn't "really" a nice guy. "Shit tests" are considered perfectly acceptable, and natural, to test if he's "weak" or "nice".
Tests are cruel, particularly in a relationship. You used an example of a dog (where at least we'll feel bad about abusing a dog, as compared to a man) but imagine an owner testing a dog's loyalty by starving and beating it and the dog "passes" the test. This is particular egregious when chivalrous thinking puts women on a pedestal as motherly "nurturers".
I, for one, even back in the 1980's considered the chivalrous pedestal to be degrading to men particularly in a society with so-called equal rights. The golden era of feminine entitlement had to have been the 1970's to 1980's: Education, healthcare, and housing were still quite affordable, a large supply of baby boomers with good income for Gen X "traditional feminists", and traditional dating mores were still in place with men asking out women at work.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago Stickied
Whoa, whoa, WHOA! /r/NiceGuys and WAATGM are not sister subs to each other, at all.
@Kevin32 created WAATGM in response to /r/NiceGuys. We are the counter to that misandrist dump in many ways.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Sorry. I changed the wording to "counterpart?"
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
Fucker beat me to it.
@polishknight, unless you mean the sub this OP was taken from, the sister sub of WAATGM is whereallthegoodmenare.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
I changed the wording to "counterpart". No offense meant. If necessary, I'll take the comment offline.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
Just correcting an inaccuracy; you're good.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
If we found that offensive, then your would have been right to have called us the sister sub of nice guys. It's all good.
uguukawaii 1y ago
My uncle is a used car salesman. He would say these type of women are used but still in circulation, lol.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
She picked the Hoe Path and not the Wife Path. (And ladies, don't fool yourselves, if you are indulging in a decade+ of serial monogamy, hookups, and trading up, you are on the Hoe Path) Is surprised that Hoe Path doesn't lead to Wife Status.
Who could have possibly predicted this?
Justanaverageguy 1y ago
Plenty of men loved your old used up ass I bet. But you overlooked them or stopped seeing them over shallow reasons because they didn’t act like Chad acts. Now you’re still chasing Chad and wondering why he don’t love you. Bitch he never loved you but you kept giving away the store for free like a dumbass and now look at you.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
The question you must pose to women who read this is “why didn’t this woman end up married with her first guy?”.
Was she “too young” for it?
You won’t just get back when you once had, simply because you want it. You get what you deserve, though!
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago
Another aspect of this is the saying,
Her predicament is that it's almost impossible to negotiate for more than you deserve, and like most (all?) inspins, she feels that she deserves much more than she's offering. Her experience in the mating market is telling her where she stands, but she doesn't want to hear it. She's upset because she can only negotiate sex from the calibre of man she wants and she doesn't want commitment from the calibre of man she deserves.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
If they don't keep the illusion of value going, the house of cards will collapse. Kind of like the US dollar or any currency. It has value only because people loudly insist that it does. But if you inflate or debase it, eventually people figure it out and the game is up.
What we have is women loudly insisting on their own worth, and if called on it they only double down. The game will be up soon.
Lionsmane8 1y ago
Yeah, artificial pussy inflation is close to reaching its tipping point.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
As always, I think its important to look for what is missing here. What does she omit? Isnt it telling that she says 'no man says they love me' but she never said that she fell in love or said 'I love you' to the men in her life. Very interesting.
She is expecting and demanding something from men that she is not willing or able to provide herself. When I hear women talking about 'serious dating' or 'dating with a purpose' or only having relationships 'which are likely to go somewhere' we all know what they are talking about - they are demanding that relationships lead to marriage. Whenever I hear that kind of talk I know we are dealing with a broken slut - because its the most unromantic way of 'evaluating' a relationship that I can think of. There is no love. There is zero romance in a broken slut with baby rabies looking around to lock down some poor fool before its too late.
It could well be that she is a broken slut and not able to pair bond anymore. She might not be able to fall in love.
reignoferror00 1y ago
Maybe because dating you is work. You're obviously looking to lock someone down and the rare times you can even reach the phase where the NRE (new relationship energy) wears off, he does a cost/benefit analysis. This never ends up in the positive. Can you do the math? Here's a hint - you don't come out as a benefit for him. You are a major long term liability.
Also, why hasn`t your therapist been useful? Are you being honest with her (and yourself)? What has she told you and have you tried to follow any of it? OR on the very low odds you have done the above, why are you still seeing her? Is she just telling you what you want to hear?
As always, what you're not saying says a LOT more than what you are saying I wish I remembered the exact quote and when I read it; something like when you're telling a story and you leave out the parts of it that make you look bad, you just come out sounding like a moron instead.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Its probably the same thing as when a chick says her ex was "abusive". The therapist probably said something like "take responsibility and improve yourself" which is white-hot kryptonite to a delusional slut like this one.
Ball_Cancell 1y ago
I came to conclusion lately that women need therapist from age of 10. More so if from single parent homes. I would say that in most cases it should be male therapist, maybe if single parent is male then therapist should be carefully selected female.
Therapist at later age is only damage control.
I generally don't take these stories seriously, as they have been run trough few woman filters and what her man said was probably a white lie anyway. All this lying to themselves is at the core of not being able to fix themselves and improve.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago
At the risk of bringing religion into the discussion; there are good reasons why Christian clergy are required to be married fathers whose families are in order (1 Timothy chapter 3 and Titus chapter 1 spell that out in detail). A man who's never been married has no experience or credibility when it comes to marriage counseling, and a man with no children (or whose children are wastrels) lacks experience and credibility when it comes to counseling parents. It's arguable that such men must have more than one child (the word used is "children") because a father with only one child lacks experience in parenting siblings.
Although some "Christian" groups practice clerical celibacy, they do so in spite of the requirements rather than because of any. That's not to say that clergymen are any more devout or theologically knowledgeable than laymen. I've been approached with suggestions that I go that route myself, but I always decline because I've never had children so I'm not qualified.
The only legitimate counseling role for women (other than their own children) is for the older women to teach the younger women how to be good wives and mothers. Interestingly, the specific things they're to teach are "how to love their husbands and children" and to be, "chaste keepers at home."
Apparently those don't come naturally to a lot of women, so they need to be taught to do them.
Ball_Cancell 1y ago
I don't mind religion preaching as long as there is consensus that religion today is layers of experience and business overlapping. I have seen wisdom in bible and lack of wisdom. If one would strip 90% bible of gibberish then it could as well be next RP book.
I don't know when priest were disallowed to marry but that had to be business decision. On one side good one, on the other bad. Good - if church would have to share spoils after divorce it would fail financially and it wouldn't be able to spread the teachings and influence. Bad because it have removed itself from reality, as we can see.
sure exp beats inexp, but in current conditions therapist without children is better than no therapist, but latter is worse than therapist with child etc. [assuming other conditions are the same]. And good luck to find enough therapists meeting all criteria to cover the real world requirement.
There is too much variables and stuff to cover anyway, but therapist from young age is a good start to build upon. Probably group therapies would be OK for better coverage and that would evolve into schools for one gender. I should patent this idea it's so innovative.
yeah and having underlying training to tackle some other problems might just help
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago
You have far more faith in secular psychotherapy than I do. The most accurate description of psychology I've ever heard is this: "A shaman in a suit."
As an academic subject, Psychology is like Women's Studies: the more you study the less you understand.
Nobody who had good parents needs a good therapist (if there even is such a thing).
Ball_Cancell 1y ago
and this is why I say therapist might make a difference in early life, instead of dealing with years of neglect and mind that is already set. First target would be single parents home. And when I say therapy, children might not even be therapy in the first place, just prevention so they would not need therapy.
once damage is done, they might have efficiency close to shamanic ritual
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 1y ago
That is shocking.
I am shocked.
This is my shocked face.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
I get the feeling that you are being sarcastic.
Call it a hunch.
No-Stress-Cat 1y ago
Looks like a Pikachu.
No-Stress-Cat 1y ago
DUH. When women refuse to look in the mirror, even when told to do so by other women, no amount of therapy will be useful.
She had a solid relationship up until the age of 25, when she decided to hop on the CC to obviously find something better.
So for 10 years she played the bicycle game, falling for the Chads of whom none decided to commit.
At least 7 longer-than-a-few months "relationships" and "many" one-night stands later, she finally asks the question, "What am I doing wrong?"
Too late, Mary Jane Rottencrotch. The only thing you're good for now is a roll in the hay.
Lionsmane8 1y ago
Maybe, just maybe, she never wanted nor wants a relationship? Maybe she just wants something else entirely?
How about we run an experiment.
How about we implement a universal female subsidy?
All females regardless of age or status will be entitled to a state sponsorshil covering living expenses (plus eyelashes and shit).
I wonder what would happen?
How many women would willingly choose to be in relationships then?
Ow wait, was that done before?
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
We don't know if she had a solid relationship at 25. Something could have gone wrong with it. I think, particularly in the old days 35 years ago when I started dating, many mid-20's women who were single moms or out of their first major relationship were otherwise likable people. They did what they thought was 'right': The guy asked them out, paid for dates, and seemed ok and he was a drunk so she had to move on. That was the exception rather than the rule, back then, though.
The problem is that a 25 year old woman hitting the dating market after a major breakup cannot engage in "traditional dating" like a half century ago. Men are discouraged from asking her out at work, there are fewer social venues to make "natural ask outs" likely (disco clubs are noisy, while dance halls in the 1940's had couples dancing by default), and so on.
Unlike men, they don't have feedback mechanisms as obvious to hint they need to re-evaluate their life. If you're a man and you're slacking, we know it immediately. We'll be ignored if not shunned in public. There is nobody whispering sweet lies in our ears. Women 25 to 35 can get tons of validation, even if it's misguided.
No-Stress-Cat 1y ago
You're right, we don't know. I'm going on the assumption from the context. It was "very serious" enough for her, and we've all heard the stories about "I was young, I was dumb, I didn't understand what I was doing at 18, I was just a child blah blah blah" before they blew up the FOMO powder keg they'd been filling over the years. It's obvious something did go wrong with it, or else she wouldn't have hopped off the "very serious" relationship wagon and onto the CC.
By the way, I read that this chick picked up herpes a few years ago from one of her many adventures, and now she's looking for exclusivity before intimacy. That might have something to do with her having a hard time finding someone to "fall in love" with her.
Seagram7 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Talk about a crash in both SMV and RMV. Even the thirstiest guy is going to think twice about sticking his dick into her. Having herpes is up there with being a single mother except most guys wont hesitate sticking his dick into a single mother, but herpes is a whole other ballpark. I can just imagine the countless "we need to talk" conversations she must of had with her many suitors and watching the reaction on his face and the light fading from his eyes and she knows it's another guy looking for the exit. That is true FAFO all because she had FOMO
Seagram7 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Back in the 80s was probably the first generation of girls that were brought up to believe a woman must have "gained experience" with different men. They believed that all guys slept around - which was always a myth - but they were convinced they had to do the same.
Whatever made women go off the rails (feminism?) that made them think sexual promiscuity is ok, it is the direct cause to the sexual market we all have to navigate today. Women now spend their best, most attractive, fertile years jumping from man to man. Many are now finding out the hard way that Mr. Big isnt waiting for her at the end of her journey of amazing experiences.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks women should be smart, opinionated and ambitious. Someone who values fairness and expects or, even better, wants to do his share in the home. These men exist and, trust me, over time, nothing is sexier.
― Sheryl Sandberg,
Seagram7 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I am growing to hate the term "situationship" Call it for what it really is, you are a: fuckbuddy, a bootycall, promiscuous sex. This is a great example of a woman's cognitive dissonance. She thinks: "I am not a whore or a slut" but she is being used like one, so women have to create terms that are not as brutal because the truth is brutal. Situationship is the term they came up with because it is less harsh that the word slut. They used to use FWB Friends With Benefits but that became synonymous with promiscuity. When situationship becomes synonymous with slut, I am waiting to see what the next word they come up with.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I'm with you on that one -- and many others.
TikTok is a raw firehose of female bullshit 24/7, and even though I just get very small glimpses of it through a satirical youtube channel, its enough to put me off of ever trying to hit online dating or talking to a "modern" slut.
At least it has been educational in what to look for - if I hear any of those terms online trip out of some chick's mouth, I know she's totally lost.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
What did Will Smith's wife call her affair? Entanglement