Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
polishknight
Posted 1y ago in Leftovers - Permalink - Locked - 8.3K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
cosmicbuffalo 1y ago
The kind of app she’s looking for is OKCupid (if it still exists?). That’s where I met my now-wife. You could put answers to questions as “mandatory”. Very effective in weeding out CC women (depending on age, you still had to do a little research).
But if she did that, she’d find zero “compatible men” because none of the ones left would be Chad-enough to get her motor rolling. If she’d only had that conversation with herself 10-15 years earlier.
nicknack 1y ago
Why don’t men want to talk to me? (Meanwhile, she has by her words thousands of men on the same app that want to talk to her that she’s ignoring)
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 1y ago
Good grief, where to start?
Three days on the app and she counts her likes in quadruple digits. Most men would kill for 1/100th of that kind of attention.
It's not all men. Most men would be thrilled to get a message that's actually showing a response to the effort they've put into constructing their profiles and probably shoot back a prompt reply.
Of course, you're not swiping on "all" men. You're swiping on the same top 10% as every other woman, so they don't have to put in that kind of effort. They can afford to be picky. They can even afford to waste your time and play stupid little games. Speaking of...
Pretty much, yeah. Welcome to dating as a man. Sucks when the shoe's on the other foot, don't it?
Years ago you were young enough to still be on the radar of the Chads you're chasing. Now you've hit The Big Three Oh you've aged out of the game. I suspect no one ever told you a woman's sexual power is all front-loaded and decreases sharply with time - or if they did you screeched curses of soggy knees at them and refused to listen.
Either way, your ticket for the C-suite cock carousel has expired. You'll have to content yourself with the D-suite. Then the F. Then on down the line from there until even the Z-suite carousel guards are forcibly ejecting you from the premises.
See above re: chasing Chad.
You submitted yourself to the sisterhood for validation and they obliged because that's what women do. I wonder how many of those who dissented did so with honest feedback which you simply ignored because they weren't holding up their end of the covert contract you'd drafted in your mind by posting your profile to the internet.
It's pretty much everywhere, though my understanding is NYC is even more of a meat market than other big cities due to sex demographics skewing in favor of men. Correlate that with the lifestyle advertised by the city also attracting and selecting for a greater proportion of high-achieving alpha male types and... welp.
Jumpin' Jehosephat, bury the lede much?
The fact you feel you need to pay extra for a dating app as a woman tells me there's definitely something you're not telling me. Maybe you're fat. Maybe you've a butterface. Maybe you're a "boss babe" who chases men away by bragging about the size of your career penis. Maybe you just come across as an insufferable bitch. And maybe all those rides on the CC in your 20s have caught up with you and you look like 20 miles of bad asphalt rode hard and put away wet.
Whatever the explanation, the answer is the same. The men you want no longer want you. I could list a range of options here in which you might engage going forward but, let's face it, the odds you're going to even attempt anything other than adamantly refusing to accept the reality of the situation and desperately trying to sneak in the back door of the C-suite CC for another ride are slim-to-none, and I don't feel like wasting my time in superfluous composition.
MovinCruisin 1y ago
I think this is a given lol. Imagine you're living all your teens and 20s being highly desired and getting everything you want. Being on top and spoiled is all you know... You wouldn't believe the "haters". Most people in general live as if now will last forever.
NPC070201 1y ago
Sweet Jesus....you eviscerated that hoebag. If I only had one wish today, it would be that she could see your response to her post. Respect.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Good post, and you've got a point (among many) about her paying.
I might have read it here, but the truth is men who get plenty of attention and options aren't on online dating apps unless they need to fill in a time slot, or happen to be in a new city for some reason.
Combine that with her inherent pickyness, oh you poor dear, thousands of likes to wade through, let me play the world's smallest violin, lol.
She has 20-something standards but is running rough like a oil-burning junker. Welcome to the long grey road, sweetheart. Sitting at the bus stop in your finest while the world passes you by. A fitting reward for an idiot that didn't use what she had when she had it.
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 1y ago
It's a truism of online dating that it only works for those who don't need it.
Worst part is there are fair odds she could still stick the landing if she were smart enough to get her priorities straight. 31 isn't 24 but neither is it 40. Even understanding a lot of guys' shotgun approach to OLD, with over a thousand matches I guarantee there are dozens (probably hundreds) of perfectly decent dudes in there who want her and want kids.
Sadly, she seems bent on chasing Chad to the exclusion of all else.
...sadly for her, anyway. Fortunately for the normal dudes whose lives she might otherwise have ruined by "settling for" them.
No-Stress-Cat 1y ago
You have been permanently banned from r/feminism.
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 1y ago
They like me! They really like me!
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1y ago
Let me get this straight: When you chase after the same group of dudes who get all the chicks, those dudes might not go for Ms Dull Dishwater when they're banging lingerie models?
Huh. Gotta chew on that for a while.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1y ago
This is basically most women
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
She seems genuinely confused that she got 2000 likes and then the A-listers ghost her. The thing is she didn't have to "chase" after the A-listers in the past in that she could at least be their plate. She continues to get thousands of likes, so the "sugary frosting", so to speak, of her interactions with men continue, but there's no cake, so to speak, even plate spinning.
The wall for such women isn't sudden, but rather a subtle difference in the attention they get. The catcalls, so to speak, continue so they think they're still hot.
My mother when she was 50 got catcalled along with my sister and she didn't shut about it for a month.
As much as many women gripe about "unwanted attention" from men and "harassment", it's the sugary validation that pumps their egos to record levels.
For her to "come down to earth", she'd need to actually de-value herself and "settle". Accept that she's not all that hot and reject decades of conditioning.
It' would be easier to ask someone to go cold turkey on heroin.
SpiritualEnema Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Translation for those who didn’t want to read that gibbberish:
Wahhhh! I’ve aged out of the prime cock carousel and refuse to settle for the plethora of non-Chad options presented to me.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
I think in her mind, "non-Chads" don't exist such as when she says "men do X". They don't think of non-Chads as men which, if you think about it, is quite dehumanizing. We can refer to a woman as ugly meaning we at least take responsibility for our "standards".
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1y ago
Nope. That's one of the biggest conceptual stumbling blocks.
These chicks can laugh at your jokes, act fascinated by your talents, enjoy cocktails on your dime then complain right to your face that there are no men within 2 miles.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Imagine if men employed chivalry the way women only recognize "real" men: If men only held open doors for pretty "ladies" but ignored all the others, including their mother and grandmothers. If a woman griped, he could say "you look like an old man, not a woman". If she's pretty and you're on the path to sex, then you pay for a "lady" but continue to escalate sexually to test her "ladylike" interest in you.
Many men practice this thinking already without being consciously aware of it. I personally have always been that way with a caveat below:
I never got "friendzoned" although I had been kind to some women just out of the goodness of my heart (I do this for many people, including old folks in my neighborhood) but some of the women then tried to exploit me. I'm reminded of when my wife fed a fox and the fox "rewarded" her by peeing on our door (it smelled awful) and I said "That's her way of marking her territory. That's how she says she loves you". I told her to stop feeding the fox table scraps near the house.
“If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and man.” -- Mark Twain
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
So a friend of mine wanted to get drinks last week and she was complaining about how there are no men in this town, and I look at her "I'm literally a man."
She says "yes, you're a man, but you're not available and there aren't any others". I was reminded how the average man is invisible to women.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago
A former NCO who used to work for me had spent some time as a bartender. He said that these cute girls would come in and leave with some BadBoi plate spinner who would get what they wanted and then dump them when the novelty wore off. The girls would then go back to the bar and cry in their daiquiris and assert that just wanted to find a "NICE GUY" for a change. At that point he would point out all the decent dudes sitting alone within 25 feet of her.
"There's Pete. He's a good guy. And Paul. He's nice. And Brian over there throwing darts is really solid. And Gene in the booth is really funny. Any of them would take you out and treat you well. Why not take your pick from that group? You're surrounded by good guys."
Of course they never felt any spark for any of those guys, but as soon as a guy walked in wearing ripped jeans and a leather jacket while sporting a neck tattoo...
Three weeks later it would be the same play with the same cast.
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
It's the men they choose that determine their outcomes.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
It's something I remind others of in that there are good women and wives in the USA, but they get taken and off the market since we are all aware that smart women strike while the iron is hot.
Then what's leftover are the single mothers (who chose poorly) who are on the market, the hypergamous corporate nuns, the CC riders, and so on.
Perhaps the problem is that we've allowed the narrative to be set that only men have to earn our literal humanity, as men, while all women have to do is continue breathing past the age of "maturity". In the early days of feminism, it was an offense to call a woman a "girl" but now we have a society where the bar is low and emotional immaturity in women is so normalized, they don't mind being called "girls" anymore. They even think it's cool to act like spoiled brats. People are generally confused when I say that I desire a "mature woman" because they think that women literally only "mature" by getting older physically.
Consider how women think they're superheroes for merely doing what young men achieve: Paying their own bills or owning a car but on the other hand, it's normalized for men to be a provider and protector in a society that has stripped him of the very resources to do those things as "privileged".
Further confusing the issue is the term "lady" which is synonymous with entitlement because "ladies" were historically entitled. While "acting like a lady" (or gentlemen) was equated to being mannered rather than someone who was socioeconomically deprived and hence poorly behaved. So now they think that buying an expensive handbag and driving a nice car makes them "ladies" similar to someone buying a trophy at the store makes them a 'star athlete'.
I am educating my daughter as to what "maturity" means: Understanding there are consequences to your decisions including even if you're in the "right", you could have done things better. That if you use people, you'll be surrounded by "yes" men or those who are manipulating you. To take meaningful risks when it's not desirable but nonetheless necessary AND not being reckless just because it's "fun". Nobody owes you a living but you do deserve basic human dignity. And so on.
These are basic concepts of maturity that multiple generations of women have been neglected while the ones with personal drive quietly go off the market and into a form of invisibility themselves.
You should have told the woman in response that there are no available women in town either and watched her go full NOMAD and have a CPU half-and-catch-fire.
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I just enjoy watching her spiral into ruin. It's a marvelous case study in red pill theory
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago
I've written this before, but my wife had just turned 20 when she became aware of my existence and pursued me. She'd been a cheerleader in high school and was one of those near-mythical "debt-free virgins with no tattoos" raised in an intact family. We were married less than five months later. Her IQ tops 140... clever girl.
I think it was Karen Straughn who popularized the idea that women are human beings and men are human doings.
Men are considered failures if we haven't established themselves by independently acquiring a certain lifestyle with enough "surplus" to offer that to a woman, but so many women put things like, "I have my own car and my own job" in their dating profiles. So what? They act as if 1) that's difficult for a woman to do, and 2) men who can already provide those things would view that as being some sort of bonus.
I have occasionally referred to a study done a few years ago about the number of "marriageable" men and women. Oceans of ink have been spilled in articles bemoaning the supposed lack of high-quality single men. The problem is that they always compare the number of "top" single men to the number of all single women. Of course there will be a shortage... not every woman can have one of the "top" 20% of eligible bachelors.
When they applied similar standards of MMV to women a very different story emerged. Considering unemployed men to be un-persons (we're human doings, right?) means that baby-mammas can also be removed from consideration, for example. No matter which way they manipulated the attributes they got the same answer: the real shortage in the mating market is that there are too few wife-grade single women for the number of husband-grade single men. And it's not even close.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
I just saw this joke and thought it might make a neat post on WATGMA: 3 women friends die together and go to heaven. God says there's just one rule: Don't step on the ducks. The women look down and see ducks everywhere. The first woman steps on one almost immediately and God shows up and chains her to an ugly man forever. The next one soon slips up and God immediately comes over and chains her to an ugly man. The third one is super careful and goes a whole "year" without slipping up and God quietly comes over and chains her to the most handsome man she's ever seen. She asks him "What do you think I did to deserve being chained to you?" and the handsome man replies: "I don't know about you, but I just stepped on a duck!"
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
1) Bumble is a dead app AFAIK. Women literally will not make the first move, even to just say “hi” in order for a conversation to start (after which the man proceeds to do the heavy lifting like always). When I was on there, most girls just referred you to instagram on their profile and would let the match fade otherwise.
2) women who constantly install and uninstall dating apps have the mindset of someone who spends a few weeks applying for jobs, receives a few rejections, and says “no one is hiring, I’m going back to collecting unemployment and smoking weed all day”. Yeah, you’re not always going to have a positive experience. That’s how it goes when you’re trying to sell something, whether it’s a product, your labor, or your relationship qualities. Quitting something for no reason besides not liking short term outcomes is a childish reaction. Which makes sense, since a major factor in a woman being single at 31 is that she handles social situations childishly.
3) surprise surprise. Lots of dates at 29. Almost none at 31. Wonder what happened in the interim?
4) yup, welcome to dating as a man. You swipe right on basically everyone that isn’t physically deformed or has some sort of outrageous red flag, and worry about filtering after. While I interpret her “meticulous swiping” as looking for positive attributes in a guy that are specific to her and not just Chad-hunting, I’m sure there’s a lot of men who meet all of her criteria, but didn’t pass on looks. So she’s swiping right on the same men that all women like her are swiping right on. Moreover, men usually aren’t interested in days of chit chat; they want to meet and see if they like you.
5) she pretty much tells on herself via Hinge. She’ll match with a man, they will kick off a convo, but he’ll eventually ghost it. That’s a shitty way to treat people, don’t get me wrong, but it seems like even when she overcomes her challenges in age and competition for the men that she wants, her personality ends up driving them off. I’d love to see snippets of some of the conversations that she has with men. My guess is that she’s completely disengaged and they get sick of trying.
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 1y ago
I made the mistake when I was younger of texting/chatting with a prospective match for extended periods before actually meeting up. Several times, in fact (I am not a clever man). Things seemed to be going really well when we were exchanging messages, lots of playful banter and such, then the face-to-face would happen and I'd realize she's not as attractive as her pictures made her look, she has literally no interests beyond watching Parks & Rec over and over again or she can't hold an engaging conversation to save her life.
Anymore I simply have no patience for that shit. Better to simply meet as soon as possible and immediately establish whether there's actually chemistry between us and something worth pursuing. If she puts up any substantial resistance to meeting right away I take that as the sign She's Just Not That Into Me and move on.
It's possible this approach has cost me some opportunities but I'm confident it's saved me a lot more time and avoided a lot more bullshit than I'd have otherwise dealt with had I opted instead for greater forbearance.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago
Having come of age before the internet, instant messaging, and swipe apps, I am constantly mystified at the idea of being electronic pen-pals with someone who lives within easy driving distance. Why wouldn't you want to meet a prospective mate in person as soon possible to see if you even hit it off?
My wife picked my file out of a stack of folders at a dating service. We lived about an hour apart, and we met in person that weekend after setting up logistics on the phone.
@Lone_Ranger @SpiritualEnema
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
the simple answer is that many young women have 'internet sickness' . They want to have dozens of notifications from simps on their phone. They're addicted to the validation and dopamine of "digital chasing" and don't really have much of an IRL libido.
SpiritualEnema Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
That was the major selling point to my girlfriend. “He only lives 6 minutes away!”
She approached dating like a man would, like she had something valuable (other than her body) that she could offer to others. Her approach was a turn on. She understood that men had wants/needs/desires too. She also actually acts feminine within the confines of our relationship too. No boss babes for me.
Basically what I’m trying to say is that her dating profile wasn’t just one big shit test like the majority of other attractive women’s that you see nowadays. I don’t have one-itis, but I’m pretty sure I found someone who is a relative anomaly.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago
I would argue that she approached dating like an adult would. Unfortunately, our society no longer expects women to be adults. Feminism has won, and as I frequently say, Nothing infantilizes women more than feminism.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
This is the way.
A few points to note:
"If she puts up any substantial resistance to meeting right away" = she is fat, and has used old photos.
"Better to simply meet as soon as possible" x1000. Online, the woman has the advantage. IRL, the man holds the upper ground.
"I made the mistake when I was younger of texting/chatting with a prospective match for extended periods before actually meeting up" This is the classic mistake youngsters make. I see I post about it every few days on this site, and its always the younger dudes. Thinking they can improve their 'texting game'.
SpiritualEnema Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I agree. I’m with a woman now that felt the same way. Wasting time and effort is more exhausting than a modicum of rejection.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Yeah turns out even a trained circus bear will stop dancing if it realizes there will never be any peanuts as a reward.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
There are various twisted psychological experiments that were conducted on animals but they are quite telling. One was where they put a mouse in a cage and taught it a trick with a food reward and then began to punish it with shocks for failure. Then for "fun" they shocked the mouse or set the standards increasingly high setting them up for failure. Eventually, mental pathologies would remain and the mice would continue to exhibit the pathologies even after the system was returned to normal. Repeatedly shocking the mouse whatever it did eventually left it in a catatonic state and just gave up. You can see the application of this analogy to how dating is set up for men.
There was another twisted experiment I just read about where they took mice and put them into a jar of water and waited for them to drown which took, say, about 2 hours. So they switched it up and rescued the mice at about the 1 hour 55 minute mark. Then after the mouse recovered they dropped it in the jar again and didn't rescue it and 8 hours became the norm after that. It makes me shudder how those in the elites could use these observations to manipulate us for their own gain.
So for these women, imagine that they've been toying with men like lab rats for a decade and now they're "ready to settle down" (TM) and yet, the "mice" don't want to chase after the food pellets anymore. Not only has the women's looks faded by then, but the throbbing hormones men suffer under moderate by age 30 or so.
chunky 1y ago
All she needs to do is use the app like a man. Swipe right in everything, and ghost the matches she doesn't like.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
She has no idea why she has so many likes but no dates?
Let me break it down for her (in case there are any ladies reading).
Men press like on almost anything. I've been with my mate when they browsing, and they press like in rapid succession on almost anything. Because we want to smash, and we want to smash lots and lots and lots of chicks before we get married and settle down.
A woman in her age cohort is looking for an LTR. You can tell, because she is on OLD. Women don't need to go on OLD to get a shag, they can just go to the nearest bar and sit there and wait. So, if she's on OLD, ipso facto, she is looking for marriage.
So here we have a market (OLD) that is 'failing to clear', as an economist would describe it. A bunch of women looking for an LTR partner with very high standards, Vs a bunch of guys looking for a pump and dump, with low standards.
Men are creatures that learn and respond to their environment. We have learnt that being honest means you get no shags. So instead we go on OLD, pretend that we are looking for an LTR, and click on hundreds of women in the hope of getting some pump and dump action.
Here's the thing that women need to learn - it means NOTHING if you get 2000 likes or swipes on OLD. That means zero.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
What you said "triggered" an epiphany from when I was younger: " So instead we go on OLD, pretend that we are looking for an LTR"
I thought this as well back 30 years ago and I went to a dating agency thinking those women would welcome someone such as myself looking for a LTR or even marriage. I was mistaken, though, even aging corporate nun spinsters didn't want a date with some "beta" who said he wanted a LTR or marriage (that dried them up more quickly than grapes on a Georgia sidewalk in summer) but rather "fun" men who were "interesting".
They want the "Bad boy" who gets tamed like Beauty and the Beast.
My point being that men who are out for P&D action don't need to lie about it and it wouldn't behoove them if they did. This is the mating paradigm that women have created in the past 40 years.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
she is basically looking for an app which allows women to list their deal breakers. I can see a market for this. Paid for, of course.
Could call it something like 'A Prince for Every Princess'.
$29 per month.
$49 for premium.
nicknack 1y ago
What’s funny is even there on that app it’ll be a prince for all the princesses
wswZtyqNGQ 1y ago
Those are rookie numbers! There's thousands of corporate nun mark-ettes waiting to be played.
Make it $5000 a month and you're guaranteed, say, 2 dates per month. Take $2000 of it and pay some chiseled rent-boys a thousand each to dress up and go on a fake date with the women, even to shag them. Then have them turn all beta afterwards during texts so that the mark-ette will immediately dry up like the Sahara. (You can do the texting yourself if needs be.) Rinse and repeat, and profit like a madman!
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
We could call it 'Only Chads'