Thanks for your response. It was hardly helpful.

That, in a nutshell, is why she is single.

I had to stop for a minute after the first paragraph when I read "will share that in words": "I am not prepared to underplay my achievements. However, I have a very soft edge, very loving, caring, nurturing side and even will share that in words on a first date."

I'm an insufferable cunt, but I will share IN WORDS (because actions take too much effort) how I can sometimes not be (while fingers crossed behind back).

or how about I go on a date with her, disparage her looks and intelligence, close the door in her face, tell her to pay for the bill for both our meals but say I have the side of being a charming, courteous, generous guy. I'm sure me just saying that will impress her and make up for everything.

Just in case there is are any women reading this...let me let you in on a secret.

No man in the history of this world has ever been intimidated by any woman, ever.

It simply does not happen. The lowliest of men, the uneducated street sweeper, short and chubby, with only one good eye and missing teeth, he is not intimidated by the high flying, rich, beautiful, young, educated, successful women that he sees stepping out of limos.

If you really do actually think that men really are 'intimidated' by you, you need to do some self analysis and maybe also some reading. Don't bother with therapy, the results don't warrant the investment (echo chamber, feminist agenda).

Take it from men - we are simply NOT intimidated by you, no matter what you think. It's more probable that we simply don't like you (because you are pompous and delusional) or that we simply don't find you attractive (because you are impotent).

That is all.

The price for being a "strong and independent woman" is to remain a "strong and independent woman" for the rest of your life.

Hmm if a man has a choice between two candies, one that is solid chocolate, and the other with a shell made of rancid bile shits, which do you think he's going to pick?

That's right, the type-A Hypercunt shell is about as appealing as a rancid bile shit. The only thing intimidating about that is the amount of laundry cycles it takes to get the smell and stains out if you accidentally touch it.

How I see things when it comes to the "strong successful women" is that it is not their supposed success that is turning off men, but rather a lack of feminine traits on the woman's part and an abrasiveness that many of these women have when it comes to how they deal with men (i.e. being a bitch with a major ego problem). Men are generally not afraid of such women, but rather they find these women lacking in most of the characteristics they want in a woman.

Can a woman be making a whole lot of money with a successful career and still be feminine? Maybe. But how many women are able to be both of those, truly? Many women who are able to succeed in any sort of career do so because they either abandon their femininity or never had it in the first place. For a woman who wants to actually compete in the career realm, taking on more masculine traits will be a boon to their success in the work world. But in the dating world? This will hinder them greatly, along with the fact that women who make a lot of money are very likely to not accept a man who is making less money than them, which means the pool of men they are selecting for is highly limited. And men in this pool? They do not want/need a woman who makes a ton of money. So many career women price themselves out of the dating market.

If this woman is one of those rare exceptions and is still feminine, she is going to have to accept that stereotypes exist for a reason. And she will have to maybe reconsider her approach in the dating world, mostly not emphasizing her career when she is meeting men, because that only goes to make her appear more like the stereotype. And we are only getting her word about her not being "one of those types of career women." Being a fly on the wall during her encounters with men would be necessary to know how accurate she is (likely not as accurate as she claims).

I've come back to this post a few times to read over it. I'm a big fan of the written word, I love reading and I can admire a well written book perhaps more than any other art form. I am often amazed at how badly women write. I think that the usual reason that they write so incoherently is because they think so incoherently.

Just take this one single sentence from the word salad above, for your consideration:

"I don't think that any man has the answer to my question of how to change the mindset that ALL successful women have the "let's wait and see if the she drops" attitude."

W t actual fuck.

There's no room in her heart or mind, for she is already way too full of herself.

blah blah blah

To quote KS:

"Are you getting the results you want?" "How many men are vetting you RIGHT NOW for marriage?"

all you men... are intimidated and afraid of women who are successful

No, we just find them to be insufferable, solipsistic snobs. You're distasteful and disgusting. You know that feeling you get when you hear "man living in his parents' basement playing video games?" You get this kind of icky feeling inside? Yeah, that's exactly how men feel when they hear "successful woman" or "career woman".

You are anything but successful. My wife just made delicious bagels today from scratch with her own starter, screwed/sucked her husband after spending lots of quality time with him, did errands, made dinner, and canned pickles/jam with our kid. Beat that, career bitch. Seriously. Then tell me how intimidated I am of you. You're just disgusting. No man wants you, your attitude, or your "success".

Of course she looks down her nose at men who make less money than her. Hypergamy.

I have to wonder if maybe there’s a male counterpart, though. Since hypergamy is an innate female trait, it makes sense for there to be a corresponding and complimentary male version of that trait. Let’s call it:

Hypogamy. Just as women are repulsed by men who they believe are below them, are men repulsed by women they think are above them? It’s worth considering. “Successful” women miscategorize men’s hypogamic revulsion as “intimidation.” It’s easy to demonstrate, too. Imagine how this would be perceived:

It takes a feminine, emotionally centered woman to be able to be with, enjoy, romanticize, and have intimacy with weak, soft, emotionally sensitive men who like antiquing and fluffy throw pillows. It’s not fair that successful, independent career women are intimidated by those men.

It’s absurd on its face, yet even though she would instantly recognize the absurdity of it, her complaint is the female version of that.

Nobody would say that a woman is intimidated by a weak man… her hypergamy is above reproach. Yet women who go out of their way to achieve masculine markers of success throw around the word “intimidation” like confetti. It’s not that we’re intimidated… it’s that we have hypogamy and we’re just as repulsed by women who embrace masculine traits as women are by men who embrace feminine ones.

Tl;dr… It’s not that we’re intimidated; you just give us the “ick.”

successful, bright, articulate attractive woman

I don't care. How old are you? How much do you weight? Do you have any bast- oh, nevermind; you're a career woman.

I have a very soft edge, very loving, caring nurturing side

warm, nurturing, loving, kind

And yet:

all you men that post on this blog are intimidated and afraid

"self inflicted emasculation"

Yeah.

Claiming that men would rather metaphorically cut their own balls instead of dating you is not the burn you think it is.

I have read a few 'red flag lists' and I have never seen 'thinks men are intimidate by her' (TMAIBH) listed as a red flag.

After much consideration, I now think that TMAIBH has got to be the number 1 red flag of all time, esp in women over 30. I would consider it a bigger red flag that even multiple tattoos and facial piercings.

Here is why.

A woman that believes TMAIBH is simultaneously bragging that she is amazingly successful (usually meaning that they are not homeless and able to read and write) AND also using this as an excuse as to why no man wants anything to do with her. It simply has to be all of mankind that are at fault, it cannot be her.

There's an old german joke about an old guy going down the Autobahn, and a police alert comes on the radio warning about some crazy guy driving the wrong way on the motorway. The old man thinks to himself "They're warning about one car going the wrong way?? I've seen hundreds of them in the last few minutes!!!"

If I had to choose between a woman that really thinks that men are intimidated by her and a woman that was fat and had tattoos, I would not pick the woman that TMAIBH.

Because TMAIBH is crystal clear evidence of mental illness.

This is a woman who doesn't underplay herself, so we can assume that if she was young, slim and pretty she would say so.

How many times do we read "I am young, slim, pretty, loving, caring and adoring, why can't I find a man to date me?"...... that's right: never.

Since it looks like a screenshot of several posts, it makes sense how much her emotions fluctuate and overall, nothing make sense at all.

Has she got a chance to open her eyes and apply some logic into her hamstring?

She is is now successful and independent, why would she need boring logic, boundaries, rules, man-o-bstacles. She can ride changing emotions, till benefits outweigh downsides.

Corporations are waiting for her at the end of that road to sell her: designer apparel, egg freezing, more feminist lies, men blaming entertainment, state is also waiting for the accommodation that will not be inherited.

"I have a very soft edge, very loving, caring nurturing side"

Great, can we see tha-

"all you men that post on this blog are intimidated and afraid"

Ah. So you're just another blowhard. And not in the way that will win you affection from men.

You have a well paying job. Congratulations, you are an adult and can pay your bills. No man is dazzled or Intimidated by a woman who does the bare minimum as a functioning adult. That being said, men don't really care about your job or career. They aren't 'Intimidated' by you. They just see you as an insufferable cunt with inflated self worth and deep down you know that.

The funniest part here are the three relationships where the men (supposedly, since she's an unreliable narrator) said "...you're actually a very sweet and loving woman."

Oh? So all three decided after saying this to chuck you over their shoulder(s)? Seems your girl boss math isn't checking out. I'm sure its just her trying to make this story seem not as bad as it is.

Everyone here has already come to the logical conclusion that she's going to age out screaming at the sky, because she won't change a single thing about herself.

I consider it a favor to the human race that none of her rotten eggs get fertilized.

Apparently it takes a "Strong emotionally centred male to be able to enjoy, romanticize and have intimacy with a successful strong woman."

Thing is, such a man will value himself. He will need to see something more than just youth and hotness (and one hopes she is still young and hot or she will need to work a lot harder). What does she bring that makes him fulfilled? She says she is kind and that is good but does she have the time to be kind to him, will she be there when he calls? Will she support his hopes and ambitions? Will she be there when times are hard for him?

If the answer is yes, then probably she can get a man but since she has not, one assumes she is missing some attribute. After 3 relationships where men have discovered she was sweet and loving inside, she still has no man. This suggests either the warmth and love faded or they were not there when needed.

Her dedication to success may be the problem, a lack of youth and beauty may be the problem or she may be the problem. Its unlikely its all the men in the world are the problem.

The wailing is getting louder and louder. These sloots are really confused about equality. Becoming the equivalent of man might make her a successful adult by male metrics, but it places her at the bottom of the desirability list. They bring nothing to the relationship that the man has not already provided. Men want a complement in a relationship, not a competitor.

Bitterness will come for this one soon.

Seems to me that she's getting the outcomes that her attitude has earned her.