Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
Land_of_the_losers
Posted 4mo ago in Complaining about jerks - Permalink - Locked - 3.2K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
user84893093748959 Jr. Hamster Analyst 4mo ago
Never marry or date single moms.
She doesn't want a husband; she doesn't want to be a wife.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 4mo ago
Huh, sounds like she should have chosen a man that doesn't treat her like crap before spreading her legs to have kids then.
But who am I kidding? I'll post my Standard Why You Should Avoid Single Moms Rant:
The men that they spread their legs for and have the children of without requiring investment/commitment are the men that these women truly prefer.
And if you have to jump through hoops to get even leftover scraps of the same, it means you don't match her preference and she does not like you that much, and as such you've already got a preview of the kind of man she's going to cheat on you with or leave you for. And both will often coincidentally happen right after she's got you on the hook financially somehow or has otherwise extracted a significant investment with no need of further maintenance on her part.
Now, if she has had the self discipline to not have that history in place, then you at least know she has a semblance of discipline even if you don't yet know if she truly likes you. But a maybe is a better starting point for relationship vetting than a definite no.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 4mo ago
The princess or independent woman philosophy is that women no longer have to "settle" for less than they want. It's a radical idea in that the majority of adults learn, often from childhood, of the importance of settling. That if they run out of your favorite brand of ice cream at the store, you can't hold you breath and throw a temper tantrum but rather just pick something else that's acceptable and move on.
Even before social media, the standard dating protocol combined with women being told (including my mother who came of age in the 1950's) "you have lots of time, just wait and it will happen when you're not looking". Women aren't "allowed" to ask men out and men prefer to deal with rejection anyway, so a woman needn't subject her "standards" to judgment aside from waiting for "real men" to live up to them.
When men fall in love with a particular woman, it's nonetheless reality that if a prettier woman was available, he'd have preferred her and heck, as women and men age, it would actually be easier for men, biologically, to "monkey branch" than women hence the divorce laws punish men for doing so but "fault" divorce and social stigma prevented women from casually monkey branching (in the past).
As Overkill_Engine points out, though, modern women have zero social or legal stigma in sleeping around without regard for the consequences.
sean_karaya Jr. Hamster Analyst 4mo ago
In Bavaria, Czechia, Moldova, and I am sure we can find similar things in Poland as well, there had been protocols about princesses. Even the Ottoman Harems had similar protocols.
Of course, not all kings followed these protocols. Of course very nasty things and backstabing politics happened in the Harems.
But that was the ideal aim to strive for.
I understand that Ideals can be a polarizing concept.
TANGENT INCOMING:
I recently read in FB an Indian male feminist stating that science and other logical things are never complete and fully error free, so pursuing them is a fools errand, and we should just let things fall, and not strive for the ideals of science . Instead we should serve women instead - may be women will uplift us. After all women invented agriculture and medicine. What else do we need. That's enough science. (paraphrased)
Context: Physics, Astronomy and other hard sciences require some universal validity of their conclusion. Such as the constant of G is, to the best of our knowledge, is a constant. Butt psychology, sociology etc aren't that universal, and hence should not be seen as written in stone.
His answer: We should see those soft sciences as more important, and recognize them as science, because women tend to """contribute""" int hese fields more. Hence this should have equal validity as all hard sciences. After all, hard sciences are also not 100% correct from the beginning, therefore striving for correctness is fools errand, and important things, such as agriculture and medicine are women's contribution ( NB: There are no archaeological evidences that these are women's contribution ) . Many Red pill strong real cave men circles tend to assign these things to women as well, because want to portray themselves as the strong, hunter, real men. In their caricature of "manhood" intellectual pursuits aren't manly things them either, so discovery of medicine? Pottery? Astronomy? : Women did that.... They forget that agriculture also used to require comparable amount of strength as hunting. May be more - may be even more sustained strength.
Their view of a real man ™ is one that has a sole goal of bringing the hunt to the women.
End tangent
The reason for going in this tangent was to show that I am aware that striving for excellence and ideal can be off putting amongst RP and BP circles alike. But that does not give validity to sub -optimal strategies or arguments. So while it is clear that not all princess were raised as dictated by above mentioned protocols, I doubt that the modern "princess" women (and their fathers alike) actually have any idea of the concept of princess. Such bastardization of the idea of princess, in Europe, I have noticed a lot in France, Spain and Italy - especially southern Italy a lot.
chunky 4mo ago
Women invented gardening. They discovered how seeds germinate while gathering as the men hunted. It wasn't "agriculture" until men's labor was harnessed (via property rights and the nuclear family) into the production of planted crops. Men did, however, bring in the suitable prey animals to the farmyard.
As for medicine, yes women did contribute much to early healing, as they has greater access to plant healing agents, as well as the social role of preserving this information in an oral tradition. But everyone gets sick, and everyone can become a healer. Both genders created medicine.
sean_karaya Jr. Hamster Analyst 4mo ago
I am genuinely curious . Do you have archaeological evidence? Or is it a attributed to women, because it "seems so" that women did all these while men hunted?
Also, about this one, I am genuinely curious : Do you have any evidence of this? They watched, sure, but is there any 2+2 = 4 moment?
Same for herbs and oral traditions : Any evidence?
All this looks like the claim that women invented astronomy and calendar to track their cycles. But that is a feminist interpretation because a feminist could not imagine a man being anything but a brute force hunter.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 4mo ago
What's the betting she has not broken up with baby daddy yet?
She is just feeling low, down on the relationship because she has now got so few prospects, so she is on there for an affair, for a monkey branch, for attention to make her feel better, for a chance to play dread game with her current man? She is probably up for all of those and has just about nothing to offer in return but she's a woman and she might give you attention, so go on sir galahad bravest of the betas, saddle up.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 4mo ago
I love how women use their "profile" space not to describe themselves, but to make demands. It's always about what the women claim to want. One of many reasons dating apps are the scourge of humanity.
All women want to be desired, but so few of them are desirable.
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst 4mo ago
Find the man that you gave 4 kids to. That's your husband.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 4mo ago
You patriarchal pig, that's how it used to work. Stop being a misogynist, it's 2024
DextroShade 4mo ago
You are making the generous assumption that she only has one baby daddy.
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst 4mo ago
Am I not merciful?
NON MIHI SUM?