Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
SwarmShawarma 1d ago
Seen this template many times
https://youtu.be/3E4s0RqCBzU
If I wouldn't accidentally came across this vid, I would never guess this is V Beckham and the guy, the face of a hard to estimate number of construction workers deaths in Quatar.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1d ago
What a load of hamstering in that clip!
SwarmShawarma 1d ago
at some point she says 'depends'
It is because sometimes it was RR and sometimes Aston Martin sports, MErcedes Cslass etc.
BTW it looks like to me staged, to heal the guy's image after him being the face of the football's [the superior version of] WC in Quatar.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1d ago
Merry Christmas, gents.
We need a new rating system. My wife cooks delicious homemade food, cleans, and obeys my every whim. She is not 18 nor a porn star, but to me she is attractive because she dresses and acts to please me alone. 10/10 would marry again.
These modern women have no idea what a marriage entails, what a man wants, or how to keep a home - yet thinks she brings joy to a man merely by existing. She thinks she adds value to his life by being able to do her hair, nails, and makeup. She thinks her husband exists to fund her shopping sprees, not understanding that a woman merely being content with her husband's income is such a great blessing to him.
Don't rate a woman by her looks, but by what she brings to the table in terms of marriage and family life. Back in the day, even average-looking women could make themselves desirable wives. They still could, if they tried. Some do, but it's gonna be slow for a while until this takes off again.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
Average at best.
NeoSpartan 2d ago
Rank 5 women think they deserve rank 8 men.
Rank 8 men fuck rank 5 women because it is very easy and sex is fun, especially if it's fast and women are easy to ghost and not have to deal with anymore, especially if they are lower than you.
Rank 5 women cry, yet only seek rank 5 men once they hit 30+.
Our system is broken. Deport feminism. Women are retards.
The 1960's and it's consequences will end up being our civilizations end.
I say this as an 8. It's great for us but not so great in that our civilization is collapsing partly because of it.
Other factors but this is a big one. Women are not long term planners. Neither are most of the people who run the USA.
It's bad. And getting worse.
Everything since 1950 needs to be reversed.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 2d ago Stickied
The mistake was earlier than that.
I agree with all you have said but the mistake was not in the 60's that was just the first time the weeds were seen. The seeds were sown earlier in giving them the vote.
Had women been encouraged to grow and accept responsibility, it might have been possible to give some of them the vote. Not all men should vote either but as it is now women have voted for over a century in most western countries. They have not been responsible. They have just been a target for politicians to promise stuff to, then they have become politicians themselves. How much has actually changed since the "a woman's mind" cartoon was published against female suffrage. The average woman is too selfish and self obsessed to vote and if she votes the people she elects will not ask her to bear most of the consequences for what they do for her, men will bear the load.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
"chivalry", as it's regarded today, was a nobility rationalist ideal describing wealthy and entitled noblemen and "ladies" as better mannered and morally superior to the lowly "serfs" who therefore could be socio-economically marginalized without guilt. A nobleman or lady could trample upon a serf without guilt since the serf didn't know the difference between a soup or tea spoon. "Gentlemen" provided for "ladies" via serfs (slaves) and land provided by her father as a dowry.
Men are told that we can "earn" respect, as human beings, via success but that bar is continually raised. It's no longer sufficient to merely "earn" a good living but also to be handsome and "interesting" while "ladies" can be obese and covered with tattoos. At least ladies of a century ago engaged in a pretense of actually having moral superiority that made sense.
[deleted]
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 2d ago
Genius :)
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 2d ago
Thanks I stole it (:
EmpireCrimson 2d ago
Well-stated.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 2d ago
(:
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2d ago
This really is a good one.
[deleted]
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1d ago Stickied
Please familiarize yourself with WAATGM's rules if you wish to participate here. Specifically, our very first rule:
no shaming men for any reason.
None of us were born perfect, and we aren't here to shit on other men who are still operating within their gynocentric conditioning or blame men for women's behavior and shitty decisions.
I came of age in the late 1990s. It wasn't nearly as awesome as you're saying. Men catered to women, and women were delusional, but it wasn't as ridiculous as it is now.
One of my intros to women's delusions and entitlement came at the hands of a young single mom I encountered using ICQ's random chat feature. She was looking for a husband, and to just skip the dating and getting to know each other thing. I expressed that I wasn't interested in providing for another man's kid, but that if she wanted to hang out and have some fun I'd be down. She said something like, "but I thought a man's whole purpose is to provide? Are you not a man?" I thought she had to be fucking with me, but I told her that I was a freshman at university, and not even ready to provide for myself let alone a family, and that if I ever were to provide for a family, it would be for a family I created and not some other dude's (or dudes') kids. She just couldn't understand why I wasn't eager to jump into the provider role for her, and this was 1998 or 1999.
I wouldn't exactly call myself or any other man I knew at the time "naturally red pilled" at all. I had enough self-respect to avoid that particular single mom, but I and many men I knew made many mistakes thinking that women were somehow nice, kind, loyal, etc.
derdeutscher 18h ago
I agree to disagree, 90s were different by a magnitude. Still, deleting comments sucks man! Whatever.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 12h ago
Well, follow the rules of the forum you're in and it won't happen to you!
You can see them by pressing that half-black, half-white button at the top right of the forum.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 2d ago
I'm not sure how much these men are really inflating their egos tho. They don't even want these men.
I think it's a cushion but I think a worse problem is women thinking all these chads that want to fuck also want to commit and they don't. That's infinitely worse bias for them. I don't think the AFCs lobbing free validation are as influential tbh
Tho it's still a problem
derdeutscher 2d ago
But if average guys stopped simping..would women still try to lock down chads? I find hard to believe that even if guys that are 5 reject her she would proceed to think she can lock down a guy who is 9.
I guess truth is in between, I agree with what you say. This bias is far more damaging
Some men are just not wired to commit..and thats EXACTLY the type they try to lock down.
Einsamer 1d ago
The problem isn't even the average guys. The problem is the state. The state is simping and you can't do anything. Police is taking your tax by force and giving it to women.
Imagine that tax money from men would only go to men and tax money from women would only go to women. That means: no free or cheap health insurance or any social safety for women, no or less help by the police if things go wrong, no support in legal cases, no state programs that support single moms, get women into jobs. And so on.
The world would change faster than you can probably imagine.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 2d ago
Well, simping dries panties so are we asking if average men stopped engaging in below average behavior would women be more interested in men at their level?
I'm not sure. This is a thought experiment that is hard to test large scale. There are plenty of average men getting women. They probably don't lower themselves